Modeling SI: A cognitive approach

Interpreting

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 235-260

  Moser, Peter ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989376867     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.1.2.04lon     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Altman, J. (1990). What helps effective communication? Some interpreters’ views. The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 3, 23-32
2. Anderson, J.R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
3. Coughlin, J. (1985). Interpreters’ training: Learning to control the bilingual switch mechanism. Babel, 37(1), 20-26
4. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris
5. Dancette, J. (1994). Parcours de Traduction: Etude expérimentale du processus de compréhension. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille
6. Darô, V., & Fabbro, F. (1994). Verbal memory during simultaneous interpretation: Effects of phonological interference. Applied Linguistics, 75(4), 365-381
7. de Groot, A. M. B. (1994). Forward and backward translation by bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 600-629
8. Dillinger, M. (1989). Component processes of simultaneous interpreting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal
9. Gerver, D. (1976). Empirical studies of simultaneous interpretation: A review and a model. In R.W. Brislin (Ed.), Translation: Applications and research (pp. 165-207). New York: Gardner Press
10. Gibson, E. A. F. (1991). A computational theory of human linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown. Technical Report CMU-CMT-91-125, Pittsburgh: CMU
11. Gile, D. (1990a). La traduction et l’interprétation comme révélateurs des mécanismes de production et de compréhension du discours. Meta, 35(1), 20-27
12. Gile, D. (1990b). Scientific research vs. personal theories in the investigation of interpretation. In L.Gran & C. Taylor (Eds.), Aspects of applied and experimental research on conference interpretation (pp. 226-236). Udine: Campanotto Editore
13. Gile, D. (1991). The processing capacity issue in conference interpretation. Babel, 37(l):15-27
14. Gile, D. (1997). Conference interpreting as a cognitive management problem. In J.H. Danks, G.M. Shreve, S.B. Fountain, & M.K. McBeath (Eds.), Cognitive processes in translation and interpretation (pp. 196-214). London: Sage
15. Grosjean, F., & Soares, C. (1986). Processing mixed language. Some preliminary findings. In J. Vaid (Ed.), Language processing in bilinguals: Psycholinguistic and neuropsychological perspectives (pp. 145-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
16. Jackendoff, R.S. (1977). X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
17. Johnson, T. R., & Zhang, J. (1995). A hybrid learning model of abductive reasoning. In The Fifteenth Soar Workshop (pp. 9-21). Pittsburgh: CMU
18. Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension. Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149
19. Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394
20. Lehman, J. F., Lewis, R. L., & Newell, A. (1991). Natural language comprehension in Soar: Spring 1991. Technical Report CMU-CS-91-117. Pittsburgh: CMU
21. Lewis, R. (1993). An architecturally-based theory of human sentence comprehension. Technical Report CMU-CS-93-226. Pittsburgh: CMU
22. McDonald J.L., & Carpenter, P.A. (1981). Simultaneous translation: Idiom interpretation and parsing heuristics. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 20-247
23. Mackintosh, J. (1985). The Kintsch and Van Dijk model of discourse comprehension and production applied to the interpretation process. Meta, 30(1), 37-43
24. Moser, B. (1978). Simultaneous translation: Linguistic, psycholinguistic and human information processing aspects. In D. Gerver & W.H. Sinaiko (Eds.), Language Interpretation and Communication (pp. 353-368). London: Plenum Press
25. Moser-Mercer, B. (1997). Beyond curiosity: Can interpreting research meet the challenge? In J.H. Danks, G.M. Shreve, S.B. Fountain, & M.K. McBeath (Eds.), Cognitive processes in translation and interpretation (pp. 176-195). London: Sage
26. Nelson, G., Lehman, J. F., & John, B. E. (1994). Integrating cognitive capabilities in a real-time task. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 658-663). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
27. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
28. Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
29. Rosenbloom, P., Laird, J., & Newell, A. (1993). The Soar papers: Readings on integrated intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
30. Rubinoff, R., & Lehman, J. F. (1994a). Natural language processing in an IFOR pilot. In Collected papers of the Soar/IFOR project: Spring 1994 (pp. 65-72). Pittsburgh: CMU
31. Rubinoff, R., & Lehman, J. F. (1994b). Real-time natural language generation in NL-Soar. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Natural Language Generation (pp. 199-206). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI
32. Shlesinger, M. (1994). Intonation in the production and perception of simultaneous interpretation. In S.Lambert & B. Moser-Mercer (Eds.), Bridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation (pp. 225-236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
33. Tambe, M., Johnson, W. L., Jones, R. M., Koss, F., Laird, J. E., Rosenbloom, P. S., & Schwamb, K. (1995). Intelligent agents for interactive simulation environments. AI Magazine, 76(1), 15-40