Listening to a second language through the ears of a first

Interpreting

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-23

  Cutler, Anne ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Language processing; Phonology; Reception

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989373189     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.5.1.02cut     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Abrams, R.M., Gerhardt, K.J., Huang, X., Peters, A.J.M., &Langford, R.G. (2000). Musical experiences of the unborn baby. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 231, 253-258.
2. Armitage, S.E., Baldwin, B.A., &Vince, M.A. (1980). The fetal sound environment of sheep. Science, 208, 1173-1174.
3. Aslin, R.N., Saffran, J.R., &Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month old infants. Psychological Science, 9, 321-324.
4. Aslin, R.N., Pisoni, D.B., Hennessy, B.L., &Perey, A.J. (1981). Discrimination ofvoice onset time by human infants: New findings and implications for the effects of early experience. Child Development, 52, 1135-1145.
5. Best, C.T., McRoberts, G.W., &Sithole, N.M. (1988). Examination ofperceptual reorganization for non-native speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception &Performance, 14, 345-360.
6. Bradley, D.C., Sanchez-Casas, R.M., &Garda-Albea, J.E. (1993). The status ofthe syllable in the perception of Spanish and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 197-233.
7. Christophe, A., &Morton, J. (1998). Is Dutch native English? Linguistic analysis by 2-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1, 215-219.
8. Content, A., Kearns, R. K., &Frauenfelder, U. H. (2001). Boundaries versus onsets in syllabic segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 177-199.
9. Content, A., Meunier, C., Kearns, R.K., &Frauenfelder, U.H. (2001). Sequence detection in pseudowords in French: Where is the syllable effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 609-636.
10. Cutler, A. (1990). Exploiting prosodic probabilities in speech segmentation. In G. Altmann (Ed.) Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives (pp. 105-121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Cutler, A. (1997). The syllable’s role in the segmentation of stress languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 839-845.
12. Cutler, A., &Butterfield, S. (1992). Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperception. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 218-236.
13. Cutler, A., &Carter, D.M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech &Language, 2, 133-142.
14. Cutler, A., Demuth, K., &McQueen, J.M. (2002). Universality versus language- specificity in listening to continuous speech. Psychological Science, 13, 258-262.
15. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D.G., &Segui, J. (1986). The syllable’s differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385-400.
16. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., &Segui, J. (1989). Limits on bilingualism. Nature, 340, 229-230.
17. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., &Segui, J. (1992). The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 381-410.
18. Cutler, A., &Norris, D.G. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 113-121.
19. Cutler, A., &Otake, T. (1994). Mora or phoneme? Further evidence for language-specific listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 824-844.
20. Cutler, A., &Otake, T. (2002). Rhythmic categories in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 296-322.
21. Demany, L., McKenzie, B., &Vurpillot, E. (1977). Rhythm perception in early infancy. Nature, 266, 718-719.
22. Eimas, P.D., Siqueland, E.R., Jusczyk, P.W., &Vigorito, J. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303-306.
23. Frauenfelder, U.H., &Floccia, C. (1998). The recognition of spoken words. In A.D. Friederici (ed.) Language comprehension: A biological perspective (pp. 1-40). Berlin: Springer.
24. Houston, D.M., Jusczyk, P.W., Kuijpers, C., Coolen, R., &Cutler, A. (2000). Cross-language word segmentation by 9-month-olds. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 504-509.
25. Jusczyk, P. W. (1997). The discovery of spoken language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Jusczyk, P.W., &Aslin, R.N. (1995). Infants’ detection of sound patterns ofwords in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1-23.
27. Jusczyk, P.W., Houston, D., &Newsome, M. (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 159-207.
28. Kearns, R.K. (1994). Prelexical speech processing in mono- &bilinguals. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
29. Kolinsky, R., Morais, J., &Cluytens, M. (1995). Intermediate representations in spoken word recognition: Evidence from word illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 19-40.
30. Lively, S.E., Pisoni, D.B., Yamada, R.A., Tohkura, Y., &Yamada, T. (1994). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 2076-2087.
31. Lugt, A. H. van der (2001). The use of sequential probabilities in the segmentation of speech. Perception &Psychophysics, 63, 811-823.
32. Mack, M. (1988). Sentence processing by non-native speakers of English: Evidence from the perception of natural and computer-generated anomalous L2 sentences. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 3, 293-316.
33. Massaro, D.W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Massaro, D.W., Cohen, M.M., Gesi, A., &Heredia, R. (1993). Bimodal speech perception: An examination across languages. Journal of Phonetics, 21, 445-478.
35. Massaro, D.W., Cohen, M.M., &Smeele, P.M.T. (1995). Cross-linguistic comparisons in the integration of visual and auditory speech. Memory and Cognition, 23, 113-131.
36. McQueen, J.M. (1998). Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 21-46.
37. McQueen, J.M., &Cutler, A. (1998). Morphology in word recognition. In A.M. Zwicky &A. Spencer (eds.) The Handbook of Morphology (pp. 406-427). Oxford: Blackwell.
38. McQueen, J.M., Otake, T., &Cutler, A. (2001). Rhythmic cues and possible-word constraints in Japanese speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 103-132.
39. Mehler, J., Dommergues, J.-Y., Frauenfelder, U., &Segui, J. (1981). The syllable’s role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning &Verbal Behavior, 20, 298-305.
40. Moon, C., Panneton-Cooper, R., &Fifer, W. P. (1993). Two-day-olds prefer their native language. Infant Behavior and Development, 16, 495-500.
41. Nazzi, T., Bertoncini, J., &Mehler, J. (1998). Language discrimination by newborns: Toward an understanding of the role of rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perceptional Performance, 4, 756-766.
42. Nazzi, T., Jusczyk, P.W., &Johnson, E.K. (2000). Language discrimination by English-learning 5-month-olds: Effects of rhythm and familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 1-19.
43. Norris, D.G. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
44. Norris, D.G., McQueen, J.M., Cutler, A., &Butterfield, S. (1997). The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 191-243.
45. Norris, D.G., McQueen, J.M., Cutler, A., Butterfield, S., &Kearns, R.K. (2001). Language-universal constraints on speech segmentation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 469-490.
46. Otake, T., Hatano, G., Cutler, A., &Mehler, J. (1993). Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 258-278.
47. Otake, T., Hatano, G., &Yoneyama, K. (1996). Speech segmentation by Japanese listeners. In T. Otake &A. Cutler (Eds.) Phonological Structure and Language Processing: Cross-Linguistic Studies (pp. 183-201). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
48. Pallier, C., Sebastian-Galles, N., Felguera, T., Christophe, A., &Mehler, J. (1993). Attentional allocation within the syllabic structure of spoken words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 373-389.
49. Peretz, I., Lussier, I., &Beland, R. (1996). The roles of phonological and orthographic code in word stem completion. In T. Otake, &A. Cutler (Eds.), Phonological Structure and Language Processing: Cross-Linguistic Studies (pp.217-226). Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.
50. Schreuder, R., &Baayen, R.H. (1994). Prefix stripping re-revisited. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 357-375.
51. Sebastian-Galles, N., Dupoux, E., Segui, J., &Mehler, J. (1992). Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 18-32.
52. Suomi, K., McQueen, J.M., &Cutler, A. (1997). Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 422-444.
53. Takano, Y. &Noda, A. (1993). A temporary decline of thinking ability during foreign language processing. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 445-462.
54. Trehub, S.E. (1976). The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults. Child Development, 47, 466-472.
55. Tsushima, T., Takizawa, O., Sasaki, M., Siraki, S., Nishi, K., Kohno, M., Menyuk, P., &Best, C. (1994). Discrimination of English /r-l/and /w-y/by Japanese infants at 6-12 months: Language specific developmental changes in speech perception abilities. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 1695-1698). Yokohama, Japan.
56. Van de Weijer, J. (1999). Language input for word discovery. PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
57. Van Zon, M.D.C.M. (1997). Speech processing in Dutch: A cross-linguistic approach. PhD thesis, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
58. Vroomen, J., &de Gelder, B. (1995). Metrical segmentation and lexical inhibition in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 98-108.
59. Vroomen, J., van Zon, M., &De Gelder, B. (1996). Cues to speech segmentation: Evidence from juncture misperceptions and word spotting. Memory and Cognition, 24, 744-755.
60. Weber, A. (2000). The role of phonotactics in the segmentation of native and non-native continuous speech. In Proceedings of SWAP (Workshop on Spoken Word Access Processes) (pp. 143-146). Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
61. Werker, J.F., Gilbert, J.H., Humphrey, K., &Tees, R.C. (1981). Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. Child Development, 52, 349-355.
62. Werker, J.F., &Lalonde, C.E. (1988). Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology, 24, 672-683.
63. Werker, J. F., &Tees, R.C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence forperceptu-al reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior &Development, 7, 49-63.
64. Yip, M.C.W. (2000). Recognition of spoken words in continuous speech: Effects of transitional probability. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Spoken LanguageProcessing, (pp.758-761). Beijing, China.