Corpora for theory and practice

International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-37

  Barlow, Michael ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Language Learning; Lexis; Reflexive; Schema

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989367394     PISSN: 13846655     EISSN: 15699811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.1.1.03bar     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aarts, J. 1991. “Intuition-Based and Observation-Based Grammars.” In Aijmer, K. and B. Altenberg (eds.), English Corpus Linguistics. 44-62. London: Longman
2. Azar, B. 1992. Fundamentals of English Grammar. Second Edition. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Regents
3. Barlow, M. 1992a. A Situated Theory of Agreement. (Garland Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics.) New York: Garland
4. Barlow, M. 1992b. “Using Concordance Software in Language Teaching and Research.” In Shinjo, W. et al. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Foreign Language Education and Technology. 365-373. Kasugai, Japan: LLAJ & IALL
5. Barlow, M. 1995. A Guide to ParaConc. Houston: Athelstan
6. Barlow, M. Forthcoming. “Parallel Texts in Linguistic Analysis.” In M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds.) Usage-Based Models of Language
7. Barlow, M. and S. Kemmer. 1994. “A Schema-Based Approach to Grammatical Description.” In R. Corrigan, G. Iverson and S. Lima (eds.), The Reality of Linguistic Rules. 19-42. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins
8. Barwise, J. and J. Perry. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press
9. Bates, E. and B. MacWhinney. 1989. “Functionalism and the Competition Model.” In B. MacWhinney and E. Bates (eds.), The Cross-Linguistic Study of Sentence Processing, 3-73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10. Biber, D. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
11. Biber, D. and E. Finegan. 1991. “On the Exploitation of Computerized Corpora in Variation Studies.” In K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds.), English Corpus Linguistics. 204-220. London: Longman
12. Bybee, J. 1988. “Morphology as Lexical Organization.” In M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds), Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modem Linguistics. 119-141. San Diego: Academic Press
13. Chafe, W., J. DuBois, and S. Thompson. 1991. “Towards a New Corpus of Spoken American English.” In K. Aijmer and B. Altenberg (eds), English Corpus Linguistics. 64-82. London: Longman
14. Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton
15. Chomsky, N. 1981. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 6.) Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press
16. Church, K., W. Gale, P. Hanks and D. Hindle. 1991. “Using Statistics in Lexical Analysis.” In U. Zemik (ed.), Lexical Acquisition. 115-64. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Erlbaum
17. Clear, J. 1993. “From Firth Principles: Computational Tools for the Study of Collocation.” In M. Baker, G. Francis, and E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
18. Cook, V. 1994. “Universal Grammar and the Learning and Teaching of Second Languages.” In T. Odlin (ed.), Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. 25-48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
19. Faltz, L. 1977. Reflexivization: A Study in Universal Syntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. [Reprinted 1985 by Garland Publishing, New York.]
20. Fillmore, C. 1988. “The Mechanisms of Construction Grammar.” Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by S. Axmaker et al., 35-55. Berkeley: BLS
21. Fillmore, C., P. Kay, and M. Catherine O’Connor. 1988. “Regularity and Idiomaticity in the Lexicon: The Case of let alone.” Language 64(3): 501-538
22. Firth, J. R. 1957. “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930-1955.” Studies in Linguistic Analysis. (Special volume of the Philological Society.) Oxford
23. Givon, T. 1984, 1991. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Vols. I and II. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins
24. Harris, Z. 1957. “Co-occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure.” Language 33(3): 283-340
25. Johns, T. 1988. “Whence and Whither Classroom Concordancing?” In T. Bongaerts et al. (eds.), Computer Applications in Language Learning. Dordrecht: Foris
26. Johns, T. 1991a. “Should You Be Persuaded — Two Examples of Data-Driven Learning Materials.” English Language Research Journal 4, 1-16. Birmingham: University of Birmingham
27. Johns, T. 1991b. “From Printout to Handout: Grammar and Vocabulary Learning in the Context of Data-Driven Learning.” English Language Research Journal 4, 27-45. Birmingham: University of Birmingham
28. Jordan, G. 1992. Concordances: Research Findings and Learner Processes. Unpub. M.A. Dissertation
29. Kemmer, S. 1992. “Grammatical Prototypes and Competing Motivations in a Theory of Linguistic Change.” In G. Davis and G. K. Iverson (eds.), Explanation in Historical Linguistics, 145-166. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins
30. Kemmer, S. 1993a. “Middle Voice, Transitivity and the Elaboration of Events.” In B. Fox and P. Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and Function, 179-230. (Typological Studies in Language 27.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins
31. Kemmer, S. 1993b. The Middle Voice. (Typological Studies in Language 23.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins
32. Kemmer, S. 1994. “Pattern Crystallization in Syntactic Change.” Paper presented at the Symposium on Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Grammaticalization. Sophienberg Castle, Denmark
33. Kemmer, S. 1995. “Emphatic and Reflexive -self: Expectations, Viewpoint, and Subjectivity.” In S. Wright and D. Stein (eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivization in Language, 55-82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
34. Kemmer, S. and Barlow, M. In press. “Emphatic -self in Discourse.” To appear in Conceptual Structures, Discourse, and Language, ed. by Adele Goldberg. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information
35. Kuno, S. 1979. Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
36. Langacker, R. 1987, 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vols. I and II. Stanford: Stanford University Press
37. Langacker, R. 1988. “A Usage-Based Model.” In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. 127-161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
38. Langacker, R. 1990. “The Rule Controversy: A Cognitive Grammar Approach.” CRL Newsletter (4) 3, 1-3
39. Langacker, R. Forthcoming. “A Dynamic Usage-Based Model.” In M. Barlow and S. Kemmer (eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language
40. Lewis, M. 1993. The Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications
41. Maldonado, R. 1992. Middle Voice: The Case of Spanish se. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego
42. Mandler, J. 1984. Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
43. Nattinger, J. R. and J. S. Decarrico. 1992. Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press
44. Odlin, T. 1994. “The Introspective Hierarchy: A Comparison of the Intuitions of Linguists, Teachers, and Learners.” In T. Odlin (ed), Perspective on Pedagogical Grammar. 271-292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
45. Quirk, R. 1992. “On Corpus Principles and Design.” In Svartvik, J. (ed.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics. 457-469. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
46. Rice, S. 1987. Towards a Cognitive Model of Transitivity. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego
47. Rumelhart, D. E. 1980. “Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition.” In R.J. Spiro, B. Bruce, and W. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education. 33-58. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
48. Rumelhart, D. E. and Ortony, A. 1977. “The Representation of Knowledge in Memory.” In R.C. Anderson, R.J. Spiro, and W.E. Montague (eds.), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
49. Rumelhart, D. E., P. Smolensky, J.L. McClelland, and G.E. Hinton. 1986. “Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP models.” In J.L. McClelland and D.E. Rumelhart (eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and Biological Models. 7-57. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press
50. Sampson, G. 1987. “Evidence Against the ‘Grammatical7‘Ungrammaticar Distinction.” In W. Meijs (ed), Corpus Linguistics and Beyond. 219-226. Amsterdam: Rodopi
51. Sinclair, J. McH. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press
52. Stevens, V. 1991. “Concordance-Based Vocabulary Exercises: A Viable Alternative to Gap-Filling.” English Language Research Journal 4: 47-61. Birmingham: University of Birmingham
53. Stubbs, M. 1995. “Collocations and Semantic Profiles: On the Cause of the Trouble with Quantitative Studies.” Functions of Language 2(1): 23-55
54. Tribble, C. and G. Jones. 1990. Concordances in the Classroom. London: Longman
55. van Hoek, K. 1992. Paths Through Conceptual Structure: Constraints on Pronominal Anaphora. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego
56. White, L. 1989. Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
57. Willis, D. 1990. The Lexical Syllabus. London: Collins
58. Zribi-Hertz, A. 1989. “Anaphor Binding and Narrative Point of View: English Reflexive Pronouns in Sentence and Discourse.” Language 65(4): 695-727