Translating the untranslatable: The translator’s aesthetic, ideological and political responsibility

Target

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 43-68

  Lane Mercier, Gillian ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989366445     PISSN: 09241884     EISSN: 15699986     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/target.9.1.04lan     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arrojo, Rosemary. 1994. “Fidelity and the Gendered Translation”. TTR 7:2. 147-163.
2. Barthes, Roland. 1984. Le bruissement du langage. Paris: Seuil.
3. Berman, Antoine. 1984. L’épreuve de Tétranger. Paris: Gallimard.
4. Berman, Antoine. 1985a. “La traduction comme épreuve de l’étranger”. Texte 4. 67-81.
5. Berman, Antoine. 1985b. “La traduction et la lettre ou Tauberge du lointain”. Antoine Berman et al., eds. les tours de babel. Paris: Editions Trans-Euro Repress, 1985. 31-150.
6. Berman, Antoine. 1990. “Préface”. Brisset 1990: 9-19.
7. Berman, Antoine. 1995. Pour une critique des traductions: John Donne. Paris: Gallimard.
8. Brisset, Annie. 1990. Pour une sociocritique de la traduction: Théâtre et altérité au Québec (1968-1988). Longueuil, Québec: Les Editions du Préambule.
9. Even-Zohar, Itamar. 1978. Papers in Historical Poetics. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics.
10. Even-Zohar, Itamar. 1979. “Polysystem Theory”. Poetics Today 1:1-2. 287-310.
11. Folkart, Barbara. 1991. Le conflit des énonciations: Traduction et discours rapporté. Candiac, Québec: Les Editions Balzac.
12. Foucault, Michel. 1976. Histoire de la sexualité I. La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
13. Kadish, Doris. 1994. “Translation in Context”. Kadish and Massardier-Kenney 1994: 2661.
14. Kadish, Doris and Fran£oise Massardier-Kenney, eds. 1994. Translating Slavery, Gender and Race in French Women’s Writing, 1793-1823. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.
15. Koskinen, Kaisa. 1994. “(Mis)translating the Untranslatable — The Impact of Deconstruc-tion and Post-Structuralism on Translation Theory”. Meta 39:3. 446-452.
16. Lane-Mercier, Gillian. 1995a. “La traduction des discours directs romanesques comme stratégie d’orientation des effets de lecture”. Palimpsestes 9. 75-91.
17. Lane-Mercier, Gillian. 1995b. “Towards a Rhetorical Practice of Mimesis: Writing/Read-ing/(Re)Translating Fictional Sociolects”. Recherches sémiotiques/Semiotic Inquiry 15:3. 105-128.
18. Lefevere, André. 1992. Translation, Rewriting, and the Manipulation of Literary Farne. London and New York: Routledge.
19. Massardier-Kenney, Franchise. 1994. “Translation Theory and Practice”. Kadish and Massardier-Kenney 1994: 11-25.
20. Schogt, Henry. 1988. Linguistics, Literary Analysis, and Literary Translation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
21. Simon, Sherry. 1992. “The Language of Cultural Difference: Figures of Alterity in Canadian Translation”. Venuti 1992: 159-176.
22. Toury, Gideon. 1980. “The Nature and Role of Norms in Literary Translation”. In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, 1980. 51-62.
23. Toury, Gideon. 1981. “Translated Literature: System, Norm, Performance. Toward a TT-Oriented Approach to Literary Translation”. Poetics Today 2:4. 9-27.[also: Toury 1980: 35-50.]
24. Toury, Gideon, 1982. “A Rationale for Descriptive Translation Studies”. Dispositio 7: 1921. 23-39.
25. Toury, Gideon. 1995. Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
26. Venuti, Lawrence. 1986. “The Translator’s Invisibility”. Criticism XXVIIL2. 179-212.
27. Venuti, Lawrence, ed. 1992. Rethinking Translation: Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology. London and New York: Routledge.
28. Venuti, Lawrence. 1992a. “Introduction”. Venuti 1992: 1-17.
29. Venuti, Lawrence. 1995. The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London and New York: Routledge.