The importance of being hybrid for spatial epidemic models: A multi-scale approach

Systems

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 309-329

  Banos, Arnaud ^a   Corson, Nathalie ^b   Gaudou, Benoit ^c   Laperrière, Vincent ^d   Coyrehourcq, Sébastien Rey ^e  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU HAVRE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOULOUSE CAPITOLE   (France)

^d University of Nice UMR 6012 ESPACE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

Author keywords

Agent based modeling; City systems; Disease spread; Metapopulation; Mobility; Model coupling; Network; ODE

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989273929     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20798954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/systems3040309     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hanski, I.; Gilpin, M.E. MetaPopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution; Academic Press: Waltham, MA, USA, 1997.
2. Levins, R. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1969, 15, 237–240.
3. Arino, J.; van den Driessche, P. A multi-city epidemic model. Math. Popul. Stud. 2003, 10, 175–193.
4. Colizza, V.; Vespignani, A. Epidemic in MetaPopulation modeling systems with heterogeneous coupling pattern: Theory and simulations. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 251, 450–467.
5. Meloni, S.; Perra, N.; Arenas, A.; Gomez, S.; Moreno, Y.; Vespignani, A. Modeling human mobility responses to the wide-scale spreading of infectious diseases. Sci. Rep. 2011, 1, 1–7.
6. Durrett, R.; Levin, S. The importance of being discrete (and spatial). Theor. Popul. Biol. 1994, 46, 363–394.
7. Fahse, L.; Wissel, C.; Grimm, V. Reconciling classical and IB Approaches in theoretical population ecology: A protocol for extracting population parameters from IBM. Am. Nat. 1998, 152, 838–852.
8. Frontier, S.; Pichod-Viale, D. Ecosystèmes, Structure, Fonctionnement, Evolution; Masson: Paris, France, 1990.
9. Ajelli, M.; GonCalves, B.; Balcan, D.; Colizza, V.; Hu, H.; Ramasco, J.J.; Merler, S.; Vespignani, A. Comparing wide-scale computational modeling Approaches to epidemic: Agent-based versus structured MetaPopulation models. BMC Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 350–352.
10. Nguyen, N.D. Coupling Equation-based and Individual-based Models in the Study of Complex Systems—A Case Study in Theoretical Population Ecology. Ph.D. Thesis, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France, 2010.
11. Kermack, W.O.; McKendrick, A.G. Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics. J. Hyg. 1939, 39, 271–288.
12. Brauer F.; van den Driessche P.; Wu J. Mathematical Epidemiology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2008.
13. Banos, A.; Corson, N.; Gaudou, B.; Laperrière, V.; Rey Coyrehourcq, S. Coupling micro and macro dynamics models on networks: Application to disease spread. In LNCS Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015.
14. Bureau of transportation Statistics. Available online: http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/data_and_statistics/index.html (accessed on 12 December 2014).
15. Gillespie, D.T. A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J. Comput. Phys. 1976, 22, 403–434.
16. Gillespie, D.T. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 2340–2361.
17. Keeling M.J. The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1999, 266, 859–867.
18. Pastor-Satorras, R.; Castellano, C.; van Mieghem, P.; Vespignani, A. Epidemic processes in complex networks. Eprint Arxiv 2014, 363, 120–131.
19. Watts, D.J.; Strogatz, S.H. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 1998, 393, 440–442.
20. Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Alofi, A.; AL-Mazrooei, A.; Elaiw, A. Revisiting node-based {SIR} models in complex networks with degree correlations. Phys. A 2015, 437, 75–88.