Proving causation in environmental litigation

Virtual Mentor

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 456-460

  Schleiter, Kristin E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989201786     PISSN: 19377010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.6.hlaw1-0906     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. King v Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, WL 484965 (Neb 2009).
2. Jackson v Nutmeg Technologies, 842 NYS2d 588 (App Div 2007).
3. Powell BH. Cause for concern: an overview of approaches to the causation problem in toxic tort litigation. J Env L Prac. 1999;9:227-258.
4. Faigman DL, Kaye DH, Saks MJ, Sanders J. Specific and general causation. M Sci Evid. 2005;3(21).
5. Harris OF. Toxic tort litigation and the causation element: is there any hope of reconciliation? Southwestern L J. 1986;40:909-964.
6. Fraser v 301-52 Townhouse Corp., 870 NYS2d 266 (App Div 2008).