Mechanisms of action of an implementation intervention in stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative interview study

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-10

  Connell, Louise A ^a   McMahon, Naoimh E ^a   Tyson, Sarah F ^b   Watkins, Caroline L ^a   Eng, Janice J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behaviour change; Implementation; Mechanisms of action; Qualitative design; Stroke

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; GENERAL HOSPITAL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTION; PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REINFORCEMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STROKE REHABILITATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HOSPITALS, GENERAL; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTION; PROFESSIONAL ROLE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); RESEARCH DESIGN; STROKE REHABILITATION; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84989177830     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1793-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, Perrier L, Rath D, Ryan D, et al. The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. BMJ. 2003;327:33-5.
2. Walker MF, Fisher RJ, Korner-Bitensky N, McCluskey A, Carey LM. From what we know to what we do: translating stroke rehabilitation research into practice. Int J Stroke. 2013;8:11-7.
3. Lang C, MacDonald J, Gnip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:3-10.
4. Lang C, MacDonald J, Reisman D, Boyd L, Kimberley T, Schindler-Ivens S, et al. Observation of Amounts of Movement Practice Provided During Stroke Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1692-8.
5. Connell L, McMahon N, Harris J, Watkins C, Eng J. A formative evaluation of the implementation of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation intervention in clinical practice: a qualitative interview study. Implement Sci. 2014;9:90.
6. Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, Dawson AS. A Self-Administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) Improves Arm Function During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation A Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2009;40:2123-8.
7. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.
8. Connell LA, McMahon NE, Redfern J, Watkins CL, Eng JJ. Development of a behaviour change intervention to increase upper limb exercise in stroke rehabilitation. Implement Sci. 2015;10:34.
9. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81-95.
10. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.
11. Lacouture A, Breton E, Guichard A, Ridde V. The concept of mechanism from a realist approach: a scoping review to facilitate its operationalization in public health program evaluation. Implement Sci. 2015;10:153.
12. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.
13. UCL Centre for Behaviour Change. Research. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/behaviour-change/applied-research. Accessed 30 November 2015.
14. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277-88.
15. May C, Finch T. Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociol. 2009;43:535-54.
16. Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.
17. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
18. Cadogan CA, Ryan C, Francis JJ, Gormley GJ, Passmore P, Kerse N, et al. Improving appropriate polypharmacy for older people in primary care: selecting components of an evidence-based intervention to target prescribing and dispensing. Implement Sci. 2015;10:161.
19. Bain E, Bubner T, Ashwood P, Van Ryswyk E, Simmonds L, Reid S, et al. Barriers and enablers to implementing antenatal magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection guidelines: a study using the theoretical domains framework. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:176.
20. French SD, Green SE, O'Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2012;7:38.
21. Tavender EJ, Bosch M, Gruen RL, Green SE, Michie S, Brennan SE, et al. Developing a targeted, theory-informed implementation intervention using two theoretical frameworks to address health professional and organisational factors: A case study to improve the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department. Implement Sci. 2015;10:74.
22. Porcheret M, Main C, Croft P, McKinley R, Hassell A, Dziedzic K. Development of a behaviour change intervention: a case study on the practical application of theory. Implement Sci. 2014;9:42.
23. Steinmo S, Fuller C, Stone SP, Michie S. Characterising an implementation intervention in terms of behaviour change techniques and theory: The 'Sepsis Six' clinical care bundle. Implement Sci. 2015;10:111.
24. McCullough AR, Ryan C, O'Neill B, Bradley JM, Elborn JS, Hughes CM. Defining the content and delivery of an intervention to Change AdhereNce to treatment in BonchiEctasis (CAN-BE): a qualitative approach incorporating the Theoretical Domains Framework, behavioural change techniques and stakeholder expert panels. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:342.
25. Little EA, Presseau J, Eccles MP. Understanding effects in reviews of implementation interventions using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implement Sci. 2015;10:90.
26. Kolehmainen N, Francis JJ. Specifying content and mechanisms of change in interventions to change professionals' practice: an illustration from the Good Goals study in occupational therapy. Implement Sci. 2012;7:100.
27. Adams AS, Soumerai SB, Lomas J, Ross-Degnan D. Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care. 1999;11:187-92.