Evaluation of nutritive value and in vitro rumen fermentation gas accumulation of de-oiled algal residues

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Han, Kun Jun ^a   McCormick, Michael E ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Louisiana State Univ Agricultural Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Crude protein; De oiled algal residue; Feed supplement; In vitro rumen fermentation gas; Macromineral; Micro mineral

Indexed keywords

EID: 84988841206     PISSN: 16749782     EISSN: 20491891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2049-1891-5-31     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Han KJ, McCormick ME, Walz R: Forage Quality Results from Louisiana and Mississippi producer's Forage Samples, 1999-2006. In Southeast Research Station Field Day Summaries, 2007. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center; 2007:35-37
2. Piorreck M, Baasch K, Pohl P: Biomass production, total protein, chlorophylls, lipids and fatty acids of freshwater green and blue-green algae under different nitrogen regimes. Phytochemistry 1984, 23:207-216
3. Beley A, Kato T, Ota Y, Spirulina (Arthropira): Potential application as an animal feed supplement. J Appl Phycol 1996, 8:303-311
4. Wijffels RH, Barbosa MJ: An outlook on microalgal biofuels. Science 2010, 329:796-799
5. Leveille GA, Sauberich HE, Shockley JW: Protein value and the amino acid deficiencies of various algae for growth of rats and chicks. J Nutr 1962, 76:423-428
6. Domozych DS, Stewart KD, Mattox KR: The comparative aspects of cell wall chemistry in the green algae (cholorphyta). J Mol Evol 1980, 15:1-12
7. Becker EW: Micro-algae as a source of protein. Biotechol Adv 2007, 25:207-210
8. Panjaitan T: Strategies to Enhance Efficiency of Microbial Protein Production in Cattle Consuming Tropical Forages. In Ph.D. Thesis. Brisbane, Australia: Schools of Animal Studies and Veterinary Science, University of Queensland; 2010
9. Lum KK, Kim J, Lei XG: Dual potential of s as a sustainable biofuel feedstock and animal feed. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2013, 4:1-7
10. AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edition. Arlington, VA: Assoc Offic Anal Chem; 1990
11. Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ: The Detergent System of Analysis and its Application to Human Foods. In The Analysis of Dietary Fiber. Edited by James WPT, Theander O. New York: Marcell Dekker; 1981:123-158
12. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ: Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and Some Applications), Agricultural Handbook no. 379. Washington, D.C: ARS-USDA; 1970
13. Schofield P, Pitt RE, Pell AN: Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. J Anim Sci 1994, 72:2980-2991
14. SAS Institute: SAS/STAT 9.2 User's Guide. 2nd edition. Cary, NC: SAS Inst; 2009
15. Clark JH, Murphy MR, Crooker BA: Supplying the protein needs of dairy cattle from by-product feeds. J Dairy Sci 1987, 70:1092-1109
16. McCormick ME, French DD, Brown TF, Cuomo GJ, Chapa AM, Fernandez JM, Beatty JF, Blouin DC: Crude protein and rumen undegradable protein effects on reproduction and lactation performance of Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 1999, 82:2697-2708
17. National Research Council: Nutrient Requirement of Dairy Cattle. 7th edition. Washington, D.C: Nat. Acad. Sci; 2001
18. Gupta UC, Gupta SC: Trace element toxicity relationships to crop production and livestock and human health. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 1998, 29:1491-1522
19. National Research Council: Mineral Tolerance of Domestic Animals. Washington, D.C: Nat Acad Sci; 1980
20. Getachew G, Robinson PH, DePeteers EJ, Taylor SJ: Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation, and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2004, 111:57-71