Relationship between social determinants of health and processes and outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes: Validation of a conceptual framework

BMC Endocrine Disorders

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Walker, Rebekah J ^a,b   Gebregziabher, Mulugeta ^a,c   Martin Harris, Bonnie ^b,c   Egede, Leonard E ^a,b,c  

^a RALPH H JOHNSON VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual framework; Diabetes; Glycemic control; Psychological; Social determinants; Socioeconomic

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DISTRESS SYNDROME; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; FATALISM; FEMALE; GENDER; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH LITERACY; HUMAN; INCOME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PERCEIVED STRESS; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RACE; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMICS; STRESS; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH EDUCATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THEORETICAL MODEL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; DEPRESSION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH LITERACY; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INCOME; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES;

EID: 84988838005     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726823     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-82     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. International Diabetes Federation: IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th edition. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2013.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National diabetes statistics report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
3. American Diabetes Association: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2014 Diabetes Care 2014, 37(Supplement 1):S14-S80.
4. Selvin E, Parrinello CM, Sacks DB, Coresh J: Trends in Prevalence and Control of Diabetes in the United State, 1988-1994 and 1999-2010. Ann Intern Med 2014, 160:517-525.
5. Walker RJ, Small BL, Campbell JA, Strom Williams JL, Egede LE: Impact of social determinants of health on outcomes for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Endocrine 2014. Feb 15. [Epub ahead of print].
6. Whiting D, Unwin V, Roglic G: Diabetes: equity and social determinants. Equity, social determinants and public health programs. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010:77-94.
7. Maddigan SL, Feeny DH, Majumdar SR, Farris KB, Johnson JA: Understanding the determinants of health for people with type 2 diabetes. Am J Public Health 2006, 96(9):1649-1655.
8. Liburd LC, Jack L, Williams S, Tucker P: Intervening on the social determinants of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Am J Prev Med 2005, 29:18-24.
9. Bonnefoy J, Morgan A, Kelly MP, Butt J, Bergman V: Constructing the evidence base on the social determinants of health: a guide. Geneva, Switzerland: The Measurement and Evidence Knowledge Network (MEKM) of the WHO commission on Social Determinants of Health; 2007.
10. Marmot M, Wilkinson R (Eds): Social Determinants of Health. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
11. Solar O, Irwin A: A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2 (Policy and Practice). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
12. Braveman P, Egerter S, Williams DR: The social determinants of health: coming of age. Annu Rev Public Health 2011, 32:381-398.
13. Marmot M: Fair society, healthy lives (the Marmot review). London: Department of Health; 2010.
14. Bierman AS, Dunn JR: Swimming upstream: access, health outcomes, and the social determinants of health. J Gen Internal Med 2006, 2(1):99-100.
15. Brown AF, Ettner SL, Piette J, Weinberger M, Gregg E, Shapiro MF, Karter AJ, Safford M, Waitzfelder B, Prata PA, Beckles GL: Socioeconomic position and health among persons with diabetes mellitus: a conceptual framework and review of the literature. Epidemiol Rev 2004, 26:63-77.
16. Agardh E, Allebeck P, Hallqvist J, Moradi T, Sidorchuk A: Type 2 diabetes incidence and socio-economic position: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Epidemiol 2011, 40(3):804e18.
17. Strom JL, Egede LE: The impact of social support on outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Curr Diab Rep 2012, 12(6):769-781.
18. Gao J, Wang J, Zheng P, Haardorfer R, Kegler MC, Zhu Y, Fu H: Effects of self-care, self-efficacy, social support on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract 2013, 14:66.
19. Fisher L, Gonzalez JS, Polonsky WH: The confusing tale of depression and distress in patients with diabetes: a call for greater clarity and precision. Diabet Med 2014. Mar 8 [e-pub ahead of print].
20. National Center for Health Statistics: Survey Questionnaire, National Health Interview Survey, 2002. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics; 2004. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_ related_1997_forward.htm.
21. Egede LE, Ellis C: Development and psychometric properties of the 12-item diabetes fatalism scale. J Gen Intern Med 2010, 25:61-66.
22. Wallston K, Rothman R, Cherrington A: Psychometric Properties of the Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS). J Behav Med 2007, 30:395-401.
23. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB: The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001, 16:606-613.
24. Gilbody S, Richards D, Brealey S, Hewitt C: Screening for depression in medical settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): a diagnostic meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2007, 22:1596-1602.
25. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Mullan JT, Skaff MM, Polonsky WH: Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. Annuls Fam Med 2008, 6(3):246-252.
26. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SLT, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM: Short screening scales to monitor population prevalence and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Med 2002, 32:959-976.
27. Sherbourne CD, The SAL, MOS: Social Support Survey. Soc Sci Med 1991, 32:705-714.
28. Cohen S, Williamson G: Perceived Stress in a Probability Sample of the United States. Spacapan, S. and Oskamp, S. (Eds.) The Social Psychology of Health. Sage: Newbury Park, CA; 1988.
29. Andreou E, Alexopoulos EC, Lionis C, Varvogli L, Gnardellis C, Chrousos GP, Darviri C: Percieved stress scale: reliability and validity study in Greece. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011, 8:3287-3298.
30. Garcia AA, Villagomez ET, Brown SA, Kouzekanani K, Hannis CL: The Starr County Diabetes Education Study: development of the Spanish-language diabetes knowledge questionnaire. Diabetes Care 2001, 24:16-21.
31. Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM: Concurrent and predictive validity of a self reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care 1986, 24:67-74.
32. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE: The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000, 23:943-950.
33. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: Questionnaire, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/survey_comp/survey_questionnaires.jsp.
34. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Survey Questionnaire, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2010. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/data_ documentation/index.htm.
35. Byrne B: Factor analytic models: viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. J Pers Assess 2005, 85(1):17-32.
36. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG: A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling: Third Edition. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group; 2010.
37. Costello AB, Osborne JW: Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assessment Res Eval 2005, 10(7):1-8.
38. Schreiber JB: Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Res Soc Adm Pharm 2008, 4:83-97.
39. Sanchez BN, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Ryan LM, Hu H: Structural equation models: a review with applications to environmental epidemiology. J Am Stat Assoc 2005, 100:1443-1455.
40. Kline RB: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 2011.
41. Hooper D, Caughlan J, Mullen MR: Structural equation modeling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Meth 2008, 6(1):53-60.
42. Ismail K, Winkley K, Rabe-Hesketh S: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2004, 363:1589-1597.
43. Alam R, Sturt J, Lall R, Winkley K: An updated meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of psychological specialists and generalist clinicians on glycaemic control and on psychological status. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 75:25-36.
44. Tahmasebi R, Noroozi A, Sadat Tavafian S: Determinants of self-management among diabetic patients: a path analysis. Asia-Pacific J Public Health 2014, [E-pub ahead of print].
45. Cosansu G, Erdogan S: Influence of psychosocial factor on self-care behaviors and glycemic control in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Transcultural Nursing 2014, 25(1):51-59.