Repetitive magnetic stimulation induces plasticity of inhibitory synapses

Nature Communications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Lenz, Maximilian ^a   Galanis, Christos ^a   Müller Dahlhaus, Florian ^b   Opitz, Alexander ^c,d   Wierenga, Corette J ^e   Szabó, Gábor ^f   Ziemann, Ulf ^b   Deller, Thomas ^a   Funke, Klaus ^g   Vlachos, Andreas ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^d CHILD MIND INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

^g RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCINEURIN; CALCIUM; CYCLOSPORIN A; GEPHYRIN; [1 [(1 FORMYL 2 PHENYLETHYL)CARBAMOYL] 2 METHYLPROPYL]CARBAMIC ACID BENZYL ESTER; 4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; 4 AMINOBUTYRIC ACID RECEPTOR; CARRIER PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

BRAIN; INHIBITOR; MAGNETIC FIELD; NEUROLOGY; PROTEIN; RODENT;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENTORHINAL CORTEX; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; HIPPOCAMPAL CA1 REGION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; MALE; MOUSE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PYRAMIDAL NERVE CELL; QUANTITATIVE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPETITIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION; SLICE CULTURE; STRATUM PYRAMIDALE; STRATUM RADIATUM; SYNAPTIC INHIBITION; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; VENTRAL HIPPOCAMPUS; WESTERN BLOTTING; ANIMAL; CELL BODY; DENDRITE; MAGNETIC FIELD; METABOLISM; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PATCH CLAMP TECHNIQUE; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

MUS;

ANIMALS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CA1 REGION, HIPPOCAMPAL; CALCIUM; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL BODY; DENDRITES; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; GABAERGIC NEURONS; GAMMA-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MICE; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PATCH-CLAMP TECHNIQUES; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION;

EID: 84988624613     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10020     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Lefaucheur, J. P. et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin. Neurophysiol. 125, 2150-2206 (2014).
2. Rothwell, J. C. Clinical applications of noninvasive electrical stimulation: problems and potential. Clin. EEG Neurosci. 43, 209-214 (2012).
3. Dayan, E., Censor, N., Buch, E. R., Sandrini, M. & Cohen, L. G. Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 838-844 (2013).
4. Muller-Dahlhaus, F. & Vlachos, A. Unraveling the cellular and molecular mechanisms of repetitive magnetic stimulation. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 6, 50 (2013).
5. Vlachos, A. et al. Repetitive magnetic stimulation induces functional and structural plasticity of excitatory postsynapses in mouse organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. J. Neurosci. 32, 17514-17523 (2012).
6. Lenz, M. et al. Repetitive magnetic stimulation induces plasticity of excitatory postsynapses on proximal dendrites of cultured mouse CA1 pyramidal neurons. Brain Struct. Funct. 220, 3323-3337 (2015).
7. Letzkus, J. J. et al. A disinhibitory microcircuit for associative fear learning in the auditory cortex. Nature 480, 331-335 (2011).
8. Pecka, M., Han, Y., Sader, E. & Mrsic-Flogel, T. D. Experience-dependent specialization of receptive field surround for selective coding of natural scenes. Neuron 84, 457-469 (2014).
9. Lovett-Barron, M. et al. Dendritic inhibition in the hippocampus supports fear learning. Science 343, 857-863 (2014).
10. Rubenstein, J. L. & Merzenich, M. M. Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems. Genes Brain Behav. 2, 255-267 (2003).
11. Yizhar, O. et al. Neocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction. Nature 477, 171-178 (2011).
12. Rowland, L. M. et al. GABA predicts inhibition of frequency-specific oscillations in schizophrenia. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 25, 83-87 (2013).
13. Rojas, D. C., Singel, D., Steinmetz, S., Hepburn, S. & Brown, M. S. Decreased left perisylvian GABA concentration in children with autism and unaffected siblings. NeuroImage 86, 28-34 (2014).
14. Kneussel, M. & Betz, H. Receptors, gephyrin and gephyrin-associated proteins: novel insights into the assembly of inhibitory postsynaptic membrane specializations. J. Physiol. 525(Pt 1): 1-9 (2000).
15. Papadopoulos, T. & Soykan, T. The role of collybistin in gephyrin clustering at inhibitory synapses: facts and open questions. Front. Cell Neurosci. 5, 11 (2011).
16. Tyagarajan, S. K. & Fritschy, J. M. Gephyrin: a master regulator of neuronal function? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 141-156 (2014).
17. Vlachos, A., Reddy-Alla, S., Papadopoulos, T., Deller, T. & Betz, H. Homeostatic regulation of gephyrin scaffolds and synaptic strength at mature hippocampal GABAergic postsynapses. Cereb. Cortex 23, 2700-2711 (2013).
18. Tyagarajan, S. K. et al. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase and glycogen synthase kinase 3beta regulate gephyrin postsynaptic aggregation and GABAergic synaptic function in a calpain-dependent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 9634-9647 (2013).
19. Bannai, H. et al. Activity-dependent tuning of inhibitory neurotransmission based on GABAAR diffusion dynamics. Neuron 62, 670-682 (2009).
20. Loebrich, S., Bahring, R., Katsuno, T., Tsukita, S. & Kneussel, M. Activated radixin is essential for GABAA receptor alpha5 subunit anchoring at the actin cytoskeleton. EMBO J. 25, 987-999 (2006).
21. Hausrat, T. J. et al. Radixin regulates synaptic GABAA receptor density and is essential for reversal learning and short-term memory. Nat. Commun. 6, 6872 (2015).
22. Wierenga, C. J. et al. Molecular and electrophysiological characterization of GFP-expressing CA1 interneurons in GAD65-GFP mice. PLoS ONE 5, e15915 (2010).
23. Tretter, V. et al. The clustering of GABA(A) receptor subtypes at inhibitory synapses is facilitated via the direct binding of receptor alpha 2 subunits to gephyrin. J. Neurosci. 28, 1356-1365 (2008).
24. Lopez-Bendito, G. et al. Preferential origin and layer destination of GAD65-GFP cortical interneurons. Cereb. Cortex 14, 1122-1133 (2004).
25. Pashut, T. et al. Patch-clamp recordings of rat neurons from acute brain slices of the somatosensory cortex during magnetic stimulation. Front. Cell Neurosci. 8, 145 (2014).
26. Donato, F., Rompani, S. B. & Caroni, P. Parvalbumin-expressing basket-cell network plasticity induced by experience regulates adult learning. Nature 504, 272-276 (2013).
27. Ruediger, S. et al. Learning-related feedforward inhibitory connectivity growth required for memory precision. Nature 473, 514-518 (2011).
28. Gibson, J. R., Huber, K. M. & Sudhof, T. C. Neuroligin-2 deletion selectively decreases inhibitory synaptic transmission originating from fast-spiking but not from somatostatin-positive interneurons. J. Neurosci. 29, 13883-13897 (2009).
29. Becker, D. et al. Functional and structural properties of dentate granule cells with hilar basal dendrites in mouse entorhino-hippocampal slice cultures. PLoS ONE 7, e48500 (2012).
30. Gersner, R., Kravetz, E., Feil, J., Pell, G. & Zangen, A. Long-term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on markers for neuroplasticity: differential outcomes in anesthetized and awake animals. J. Neurosci. 31, 7521-7526 (2011).
31. Marder, E. & Goaillard, J. M. Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 563-574 (2006).
32. Nelson, S. B. & Turrigiano, G. G. Strength through diversity. Neuron 60, 477-482 (2008).
33. Hulme, S. R., Jones, O. D. & Abraham, W. C. Emerging roles of metaplasticity in behaviour and disease. Trends Neurosci. 36, 353-362 (2013).
34. Long, Z. et al. Decreased GABA levels in anterior cingulate cortex/medial prefrontal cortex in panic disorder. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 44, 131-135 (2013).
35. Ziemann, U., Ilic, T. V. & Jung, P. Long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity and learning in human motor cortex - investigations with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Suppl. Clin. Neurophysiol. 59, 19-25 (2006).
36. Benali, A. et al. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation alters cortical inhibition. J. Neurosci. 31, 1193-1203 (2011).
37. Murakami, T., Muller-Dahlhaus, F., Lu, M. K. & Ziemann, U. Homeostatic metaplasticity of corticospinal excitatory and intracortical inhibitory neural circuits in human motor cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 590, 5765-5781 (2012).
38. Hamada, M., Murase, N., Hasan, A., Balaratnam, M. & Rothwell, J. C. The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cereb. Cortex 23, 1593-1605 (2013).
39. Flores, C. E. et al. Activity-dependent inhibitory synapse remodeling through gephyrin phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E65-E72 (2014).
40. Sola, M. et al. Structural basis of dynamic glycine receptor clustering by gephyrin. EMBO J 23, 2510-2519 (2004).
41. Saiyed, T. et al. Molecular basis of gephyrin clustering at inhibitory synapses: role of G-and E-domain interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 5625-5632 (2007).
42. Herweg, J. & Schwarz, G. Splice-specific glycine receptor binding, folding, and phosphorylation of the scaffolding protein gephyrin. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 12645-12656 (2012).
43. Meyer, G., Kirsch, J., Betz, H. & Langosch, D. Identification of a gephyrin binding motif on the glycine receptor beta subunit. Neuron 15, 563-572 (1995).
44. Tretter, V. et al. Molecular basis of the gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor alpha3 subunit interaction with the clustering protein gephyrin. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 37702-37711 (2011).
45. Meier, J., Vannier, C., Serge, A., Triller, A. & Choquet, D. Fast and reversible trapping of surface glycine receptors by gephyrin. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 253-260 (2001).
46. Jacob, T. C. et al. Gephyrin regulates the cell surface dynamics of synaptic GABAA receptors. J. Neurosci. 25, 10469-10478 (2005).
47. Levi, S. et al. Homeostatic regulation of synaptic GlyR numbers driven by lateral diffusion. Neuron 59, 261-273 (2008).
48. Wu, X. et al. gamma-Aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor alpha subunits play a direct role in synaptic versus extrasynaptic targeting. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 27417-27430 (2012).
49. Maric, H. M. et al. Molecular basis of the alternative recruitment of GABAA versus glycine receptors through gephyrin. Nat. Commun. 5, 5767 (2014).
50. Calamai, M. et al. Gephyrin oligomerization controls GlyR mobility and synaptic clustering. J. Neurosci. 29, 7639-7648 (2009).
51. Tyagarajan, S. K., Ghosh, H., Harvey, K. & Fritschy, J. M. Collybistin splice variants differentially interact with gephyrin and Cdc42 to regulate gephyrin clustering at GABAergic synapses. J. Cell Sci. 124, 2786-2796 (2011).
52. Maas, C. et al. Synaptic activation modifies microtubules underlying transport of postsynaptic cargo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8731-8736 (2009).
53. Marsden, K. C., Shemesh, A., Bayer, K. U. & Carroll, R. C. Selective translocation of Ca2+/calmodulin protein kinase IIalpha (CaMKIIalpha) to inhibitory synapses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20559-20564 (2010).
54. Kirsch, J. & Betz, H. Glycine-receptor activation is required for receptor clustering in spinal neurons. Nature 392, 717-720 (1998).
55. Dejanovic, B. et al. Exonic microdeletions of the gephyrin gene impair GABAergic synaptic inhibition in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Neurobiol. Dis. 67, 88-96 (2014).
56. Colonnier, M. in The Organization of the Cerebral Cortex (eds Schmitt, F. O., Worden, F. G., Adelman, G. & Dennis, S. G.) 125-152 (MIT Press, 1981).
57. Nguyen, R. et al. Parvalbumin and GAD65 interneuron inhibition in the ventral hippocampus induces distinct behavioral deficits relevant to schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 34, 14948-14960 (2014).
58. Donato, F., Chowdhury, A., Lahr, M. & Caroni, P. Early-and late-born parvalbumin basket cell subpopulations exhibiting distinct regulation and roles in learning. Neuron 85, 770-786 (2015).
59. Caroni, P., Chowdhury, A. & Lahr, M. Synapse rearrangements upon learning: from divergent-sparse connectivity to dedicated sub-circuits. Trends Neurosci. 37, 604-614 (2014).
60. Pell, G. S., Roth, Y. & Zangen, A. Modulation of cortical excitability induced by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: influence of timing and geometrical parameters and underlying mechanisms. Prog. Neurobiol. 93, 59-98 (2011).
61. Lopez-Alonso, V., Cheeran, B., Rio-Rodriguez, D. & Fernandez-Del-Olmo, M. Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 7, 372-380 (2014).
62. Thielscher, A. & Kammer, T. Electric field properties of two commercial figure-8 coils in TMS: calculation of focality and efficiency. Clin. Neurophysiol. 115, 1697-1708 (2004).
63. Gabriel, C., Gabriel, S. & Corthout, E. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. Phys. Med. Biol. 41, 2231-2249 (1996).
64. Opitz, A., Windhoff, M., Heidemann, R. M., Turner, R. & Thielscher, A. How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. NeuroImage 58, 849-859 (2011).
65. Thielscher, A., Opitz, A. & Windhoff, M. Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. NeuroImage 54, 234-243 (2011).
66. Plonsey, R. & Heppner, D. B. Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. Bull. Math Biophys. 29, 657-664 (1967).
67. Windhoff, M., Opitz, A. & Thielscher, A. Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: an optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34, 923-935 (2013).
68. Radman, T., Ramos, R. L., Brumberg, J. C. & Bikson, M. Role of cortical cell type and morphology in subthreshold and suprathreshold uniform electric field stimulation in vitro. Brain Stimul. 2, 215-228, e1-3 (2009).
69. Vlachos, A. et al. Synaptopodin regulates denervation-induced homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8242-8247 (2013).
70. Nusser, Z. & Mody, I. Selective modulation of tonic and phasic inhibitions in dentate gyrus granule cells. J. Neurophysiol. 87, 2624-2628 (2002).
71. Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45 (2001).