Shifting from enrollment- to performance-based funding in higher education: What can we learn from Washington’s experience?

Education Finance and Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 482-498

  Kaikkonen, Darby ^a  

^a Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84988592647     PISSN: 15573060     EISSN: 15573079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/EDFP_a_00190     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Belfield, Clive. 2012. Washington State Student Achievement Initiative: Achievement point analysis for academic years 2007–2011. Available http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/student-achievement-initiative-points-analysis.html. Accessed 13 September 2012.
2. Burke, Joseph C., and Shahpar Modarresi. 2000. To keep or not to keep performance funding: Signals from stakeholders. Journal of Higher Education 71(4):432-453. doi:10.2307/2649147.
3. Dougherty, Kevin J., and Rebecca S. Natow. 2009. The demise of higher education performance funding systems in three states. New York: CCRC, Columbia University.
4. Friedel, Janice N., Zöe Mercedes Thornton, Mark D’Amico, and Stephen G. Katsinas. 2013. Performance-based funding: The national landscape. Available www.uaedpolicy.ua.edu/uploads/2/1/3/2/21326282/pbf_9-19_web.pdf. Accessed 19 September 2013.
5. Harnisch, Thomas. 2011. Performance-based funding: A re-emerging strategy in public higher education financing. A Higher Education Policy Brief. Washington, DC: AASCU Policy Matters.
6. Hillman, Nicholas, David Tandberg, and Alisa Fryar. 2015. Evaluating the impacts of “new” performance funding in higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 37(4):501-519. doi:10.3102/0162373714560224.
7. Jenkins, Davis, Todd Ellwein, and Katherine Boswell. 2009. Formative evaluation of the Student Achievement Initiative “learning year.” Available http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/student-achievement-initiative-learning-year.html. Accessed 30 August 2013.
8. Jones, Dennis. 2012. Performance funding: From idea to action. Available http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED536832.pdf. Accessed 16 February 2016.
9. McPhail, Christine Johnson. 2011. The completion agenda:A call to action. Available www.aacc.nche.edu/Publications/Reports/Documents/CompletionAgenda_report.pdf. Accessed 2 December 2013.
10. Miao, Kysie. 2012. Performance-based funding of higher education: A detailed look at best practices in 6 states. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
11. Salomon-Fernandez, Yves. 2014. The Massachusetts community college performance-based funding formula: A new model for New England? The New England Journal of Higher Education. Available www.nebhe.org/thejournal/the-massachusetts-community-college-performance-based-funding-formula-a-new-model-for-new-england/. Accessed 15 February 2015.
12. Schulock, Nancy, and Davis Jenkins. 2011. Performance incentives to improve community college completion: Learning from Washington State’s Student Achievement Initiative. Available http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/performance-incentives-college-completion.html. Accessed 11 July 2012.
13. State Board for Community and Technical Colleges (SBCTC). 2006. System direction: Creating opportunities for Washington’s future. Available http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED496226. Accessed 16 February 2016.
14. State Board for Community and Technical Colleges (SBCTC). 2014. Washington Association of Community and Technical Colleges: Business meeting minutes. Available www.sbctc.edu/resources/documents/colleges-staff/commissions-councils/wactc/7_18_14_Business_Meeting_Minutes_with_Attachments.pdf. Accessed 16 February 2016.