-
1
-
-
84876917800
-
Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias
-
Brito JP, Tsapas A, Griebeler ML, et al. Systematic reviews supporting practice guideline recommendations lack protection against bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66 (6): 633-638.
-
(2013)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.66
, Issue.6
, pp. 633-638
-
-
Brito, J.P.1
Tsapas, A.2
Griebeler, M.L.3
-
2
-
-
84890174570
-
Not all systematic reviews are systematic: a meta-review of the quality of systematic reviews for non-invasive remote monitoring in heart failure
-
Conway A, Inglis SC, Chang AM, Horton-breshears M, Cleland JG, Clark RA,. Not all systematic reviews are systematic: a meta-review of the quality of systematic reviews for non-invasive remote monitoring in heart failure. J Telemed Telecare. 2013; 19 (6): 326-337.
-
(2013)
J Telemed Telecare
, vol.19
, Issue.6
, pp. 326-337
-
-
Conway, A.1
Inglis, S.C.2
Chang, A.M.3
Horton-Breshears, M.4
Cleland, J.G.5
Clark, R.A.6
-
3
-
-
84883537098
-
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature
-
Gagnier JJ, Kellam PJ,. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95 (11): e771-e777.
-
(2013)
J Bone Joint Surg Am
, vol.95
, Issue.11
, pp. e771-e777
-
-
Gagnier, J.J.1
Kellam, P.J.2
-
4
-
-
68049137869
-
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
-
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009; 6 (7): e1000100.
-
(2009)
PLoS Med
, vol.6
, Issue.7
-
-
Liberati, A.1
Altman, D.G.2
Tetzlaff, J.3
-
5
-
-
0033610734
-
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses
-
Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF,. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999; 354 (9193): 1896-1900.
-
(1999)
Lancet
, vol.354
, Issue.9193
, pp. 1896-1900
-
-
Moher, D.1
Cook, D.J.2
Eastwood, S.3
Olkin, I.4
Rennie, D.5
Stroup, D.F.6
-
6
-
-
84878088936
-
The quality of systematic reviews in hand surgery: an analysis using AMSTAR
-
Momeni A, Lee GK, Talley JR,. The quality of systematic reviews in hand surgery: an analysis using AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131 (4): 831-837.
-
(2013)
Plast Reconstr Surg
, vol.131
, Issue.4
, pp. 831-837
-
-
Momeni, A.1
Lee, G.K.2
Talley, J.R.3
-
7
-
-
0028128360
-
Rationale for systematic reviews
-
Mulrow CD,. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994; 309 (6954): 597-599.
-
(1994)
BMJ
, vol.309
, Issue.6954
, pp. 597-599
-
-
Mulrow, C.D.1
-
9
-
-
84895890428
-
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination
-
Remschmidt C, Wichmann O, Harder T,. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination. Vaccine. 2014; 32 (15): 1678-1684.
-
(2014)
Vaccine
, vol.32
, Issue.15
, pp. 1678-1684
-
-
Remschmidt, C.1
Wichmann, O.2
Harder, T.3
-
10
-
-
33847606952
-
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews
-
Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007; 7: 10.
-
(2007)
BMC Med Res Methodol
, vol.7
, pp. 10
-
-
Shea, B.J.1
Grimshaw, J.M.2
Wells, G.A.3
-
11
-
-
33846826565
-
How to write a systematic review
-
Wright RW, Brand RA, Dunn W, Spindler KP,. How to write a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 455: 23-29.
-
(2007)
Clin Orthop Relat Res
, vol.455
, pp. 23-29
-
-
Wright, R.W.1
Brand, R.A.2
Dunn, W.3
Spindler, K.P.4
|