The EU-project United4Health: User-centred design of an information system for a Norwegian telemedicine service

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 422-429

  Smaradottir, Berglind ^a   Gerdes, Martin ^a   Martinez, Santiago ^a   Fensli, Rune ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Health information systems; human computer interaction; telemedicine; usability; user centred design

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER INTERFACE; EDUCATION; EUROPEAN UNION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NORWAY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOFTWARE DESIGN; TELEMEDICINE;

EDUCATION; EUROPEAN UNION; HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NORWAY; PULMONARY DISEASE, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TELEMEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84988420973     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: 17581109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1357633X15615048     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. The Coordination Reform – Proper treatment – at the right place and right time. Report No. 47 to the Storting (2008–2009), 19 June 2009. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Government Security and Service Organisation
2. United4Health. Transforming the patient experience with telehealth in Europe. European Commission – ICT Policy Support Programme and Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme, http://www.united4health.eu/ (2015, accessed 8 September 2015)
3. Smaradottir B, Gerdes M, Fensli R, et al. User interface development of a COPD remote monitoring application–a user-centred design process. Proceedings: The Eighth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI 2015, IARIA), Lisbon, Portugal, 22–27 February 2015, pp.57–62. http://www.thinkmind.org/index.php?view=article&articleid=achi_2015_3_40_20235 (accessed 21 October 2015). ISSN: 2308-4138, ISBN: 978-1-61208-382-7
4. Norwegian Health Network. Nork helsenett, https://www.nhn.no/english/Pages/default.aspx (2015, accessed 8 September 2015)
5. Gerdes M and Fensli R. End-to-end security and privacy protection for co-operative access to health and care data in a telehealth trial system for remote supervision of COPD-Patients. Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings: 13th Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics, (SHI2015), 15–17 June, Tromsø, Norway, pp. 25–32. Available at: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_article/index.en.aspx?issue=115;article=005 (accessed 21 October 2015). ISBN: 978-91-7685-985-8, ISSN (print): 1650-3686, ISSN (online): 1650-3740
6. De Vito Dabbs A, Myers BA, Mc Curry KR. User-centered design and interactive health technologies for patients. Comput Inform Nurs 2009; 27: 175–183.
7. Das A, Svanæs D. Human-centred methods in the design of an e-health solution for patients undergoing weight loss treatment. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82: 1075–1091.
8. Årsand E, Tufano JT, Ralston JD. Designing mobile dietary management support technologies for people with diabetes. J Telemed Telecare 2008; 14: 329–332.
9. Lazar J, Feng JH, Hochheiser H. Research methods in human-computer interaction, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 2010. ISBN 978-0-470-72337-1.
10. Smaradottir B, Holen-Rabbersvik E, Thygesen E, et al. User-centred design of the user interface of a collaborative information system for inter-municipal dementia team. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Health Informatics (HealthInf2015, BIOSTEC), Lisbon, Portugal, 12–15 Jan 2015, pp. 446–453, Scitepress Digital Library. http://www.scitepress.org/Portal/PublicationsDetail.aspx?ID=lGxIYunzMvY=&t=1 (accessed 21 October 2015). DOI: 10.5220/0005222704460453. ISBN 978-989-758-068-0
11. Bastien JM. Usability testing: A review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method. Int J Med Inform 2010; 79: e18–e23.
12. Kushniruk AW, Patel VL. Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. J Biomed Inform 2004; 37: 56–76.
13. Jaspers MW. A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: Methodological aspects and empirical evidence. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78: 340–353.
14. Horsky J, McColgan K, Pang JE. Complementary methods of system usability evaluation: Surveys and observations during software design and development cycles. J Biomed Inform 2010; 43: 782–790.
15. Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev 1980; 87: 215–251.
16. Gerdes M, Smaradottir B and Fensli R. End-to-end infrastructure for usability evaluation of ehealth applications and services. Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings: 12th Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics (SHI2014), Grimstad, Norway, 21–22 August 2014, pp. 53–59. Available at: http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp_article/index.en.aspx?issue=102;article=008 (accessed 21 October 2015). ISBN: 978-91-7519-241-3, ISSN(print): 1650-3686, ISSN(online): 1650-3740
17. Svanæs D, Alsos OA, Dahl Y. Usability testing of mobile ICT for clinical settings: Methodological and practical challenges. Int J Med Inform 2010; 79: e24–e34.
18. Brooke J. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, London: Taylor and Francis, 1996, pp. 189–194.
19. Smaradottir B, Gerdes M, Martinez S. Usability evaluation of a COPD remote monitoring application. Stud Health Technol Inform 2015; 210: 845–849.
20. Anthonisen NR, Manfreda J, Warren CP. Antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 196–204.
21. Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Studies 2009; 4: 114–123.
22. MacLellan S, Muddimer A, Peres SC. The effect of experience on system usability scale ratings. J Usability Studies 2012; 7: 56–67.
23. Teixeira L, Ferreira C, Santos BS. User-centered requirements engineering in health information systems: A study in the hemophilia field. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2012; 106: 160–174.
24. Thoirs K, Giles E, Barber W. Use of simulated learning environments in radiation science curricula, Adelaide: University of South Australia, 2010.
25. Beaubien JM, Baker DP. The use of simulation for training teamwork skills in health care: How low can you go? Qual Saf Health Care 2004; 13: i51–i56.
26. Venot A, Burgun A, Quantin C. Medical Informatics, e-Health: Fundamentals and Applications, Paris, France: Springer Science and Business Media, 2013. ISBN 979-2-8178-0477-4. DOI 10.1007/978-2-8178-0478-1.
27. Gray WD. Simulated task environments: The role of high-fidelity simulations, scaled worlds, synthetic environments, and laboratory tasks in basic and applied cognitive research. Cogn Sci Q 2002; 2: 205–227.
28. Shaikh A. The impact of SOA on a system design for a telemedicine healthcare system. Netw Model Anal Health Inform and Bioinforma 2015; 4: 1–16.
29. Craft RL. Toward technical interoperability in telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2005; 11: 384–404.