Perception of 3D scenes from pictures

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 3299, Issue , 1998, Pages 410-423

  Pizlo, Zygmunt ^a   Scheessele, Michael R ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Perception; Perspectivity; Pictures; Projectivity; Psychophysics; Shape constancy

Indexed keywords

BINOCULAR VISION; SENSORY PERCEPTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

PERSPECTIVITY; PICTURES; PROJECTIVITY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SHAPE CONSTANCY;

STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 84988400059     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: 1996756X     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.320131     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. J. Hochberg and V. Brooks, Pictorial recognition as an unlearned ability: a study of one child's performance11, Am. J. Psychol 75, pp. 624-628, 1962.
2. A. Slater and V. Morison, Shape constancy and slant perception at birth, Perception 14, pp. 337-344, 1985.
3. M. Kemp, The science of art, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1990.
4. M. Kubovy, The psychology of perspective and renaissance art, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986.
5. C. Wheatstone, Contributions to the physiology of vision -part I, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. (London) 128, pp. 371-394, 1838.
6. M. H. Pirenne, Optics, painting and photography, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1970.
7. R. M. Haralick and L. G. Shapiro, Computer and robot vision, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1993.
8. J. E. Cutting, Rigidity in cinema seen from the front row, side aisle, J. Exp. Psych. : Human Perc. Perform. 13, pp. 323-334, 1987.
9. E. B. Goldstein, Spatial layout, orientation relative to the observer, and perceived projection in pictures viewed at an angle, J. Exp. Psych. : Human Perc. Perform. 13, pp. 256-266, 1987.
10. J. E. Cutting, Affine distortions of pictorial space: some predictions for Goldstein (1987) that La Gournerie (1859) might have made, J. Exp. Psychol: Human Perc. Perform. 14, pp. 305-311, 1988.
11. Z. Pizlo, A theory of shape constancy based on perspective invariants, Vision. Res. 34, pp. 1637-1658, 1994.
12. Z. Pizlo, A. Rosenfeld, and I. Weiss, The geometry of visual space: about the incompatibility between science and mathematics, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 65, pp. 425-433, 1997.
13. Z. Pizlo, A. Rosenfeld, and I. Weiss, Visual space: mathematics, engineering and Science, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 65, pp. 450-454, 1997.
14. K-I. Kanatani, Constraints on length and angle, Computer Vis. Graph. Image Proc. 41, pp. 28-42, 1988.
15. O. Faugeras, Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993.
16. Z. Pizlo and M. Salach-Golyska, 3D shape perception, Percept. Psychophys. 57, pp. 692-714, 1995.
17. D. N. Perkins, Visual discrimination between rectangular and nonrectangular parallelopipeds, Percept. Psychophys. 12, pp. 396-400, 1972.
18. J. Hochberg and V. Brooks, The psychophysics of form: reversible-perspective drawings of spatial objects, Am. J. Psychol. 73, pp. 337-354, 1960.
19. F. Attneave and R. Frost, The determination of perceived tridimensional orientation by minimum criteria, Percept Psychophys. 6, pp. 391-396, 1969.
20. Y. G. Leclerc and M. A. Fischler, An optimization-based approach to the interpretation of single line drawings as 3D wire frames, Internat. J. Computer Vis. 9, pp. 113-136, 1992.
21. Z. Pizlo and M. Salach-Golyska, Monocular, binocular and multiview perception, Invest. Ophthalm. Vis. Sci. 35, p. 1916, 1994 (Abstract).
22. A. N. Tikhonov and A. V. Goncharsky, Ill-posed problems in the natural sciences, MIR Publishers, Moscow, 1987.
23. T. Poggio, V. Torre, and C. Koch, Computational vision and regularization theory, Nature 317, pp. 314-319, 1985.