Tools developed and disseminated by guideline producers to promote the uptake of their guidelines

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Flodgren, Gerd ^a   Eccles, Martin P ^b   Grimshaw, Jeremy ^c   Leng, Gillian C ^d   Shepperd, Sasha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^d LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 84988381074     PISSN: 14651858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010669     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. American College of Cardiology. Cardiosource. http://www.cardio.source.org/2010 (accessed March 2012).
2. Brouwers M, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2010;E839-842:18-23.
3. Akl EA, Sackett KM, Pretorius R, Bhoopathi PSS, Mustafa R, Schünemann H, et al. Educational games for health professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006411.pub2]
4. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub2]
5. Egger M, Davey Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by simple graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-34.
6. eGuidelines.co.uk. Handbook of United Kingdom and European clinical guidelines for primary and shared care. http://www.eguidelines.co.uk/new_guidelines.php (accessed October 2011).
7. EPOC. Risk of bias tool. http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-resources 2009.
8. Field MJ, Lohr KN (editors). Clinical Practice Guidelines - directions for a new programme. Institute of Medicine. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1990.
9. Flodgren G, Parmelli E, Doumit G, Gattellari M, O'Brien MA, Grimshaw J, et al. Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 8. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub4]
10. Flodgren G, Conterno LO, Mayhew A, Omar O, Pereira CR, Shepperd S. Interventions to improve professional adherence to guidelines for prevention of device-related infections. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006559.pub2]
11. Forsetlund L, Bjørndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O'Brien MA, Wolf F, et al. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub2]
12. Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshap JM. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implementation Science 2011;6(26):1-11.
13. Giguère A, Légaré F, Grimshaw J, Turcotte S, Fiander M, Grudniewicz A, et al. Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 10. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004398.pub3]
14. Gkeredakis E, Swan J, Powell J, Nicolini D, Scarbrough H, Roginski C, et al. Mind the gap: Understanding utilisation of evidence and policy in health care management practice. Journal of Health Organization and Management 2011;25(3):298-314.
15. Brozek J, Oxman A, Schünemann H. GRADEprofiler. 3.2 for Windows. GRADE Working Group, 2008.
16. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Macfarlane F, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations. A systematic literature review. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.
17. Grilli R, Ramsay C, Minozzi S. Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000389]
18. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. NHS R&D HTA programme 2004.
19. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003;362(9391):1225-30.
20. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl E, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(4):383-94.
21. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
22. Horbar JD, Carpenter JH, Buzas J, Soll RF, Suresh G, Bracken MB, et al. Collaborative quality improvement to promote evidence based surfactant for preterm infants: a cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2004;329:1-7.
23. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub2]
24. Kanter M, Martinez O, Lindsay G, Andrews K, Denver C. Proactive office encounter: A systematic approach to preventive and chronic care at every patient encounter. Permanente Journal 2010;14:38-43.
25. Mehta RH, Montoye CK, Gallogly M, Baker P, Blount A, Faul J, et al. GAP Steering Committee of the American College of Cardiology. Improving quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: The Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Initiative. JAMA 2002;287(10):1269-76.
26. National Health Service (NHS). NHS Evidence. https://www.evidence.nhs.uk/accreditation# (accessed 30 March 2013).
27. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). Commissioning guides - supporting clinical service redesign. http://www.nice.org.uk/usingguidance/commissioningguides/bytopic.jsp (accessed 30 March 2012).
28. National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Online educational tools. http://www.nice.org.uk/usingguidance/education/educational_tools.jsp (accessed 30 March 2012).
29. O'Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, Oxman AD, Odgaard-Jensen J, Kristoffersen DT, et al. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000409.pub2]
30. Peleg M, Garber JR. Extending the GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA) instrument to identify problems in control flow. AMIA 2010 Symposium Proceedings. 2010:627-31.
31. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
32. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovation. 5th Edition. New York: Free Press. A division of Simon & Schuster, 1995.
33. Schuster MA, McGlynn EA, Brook RH. How good is the quality of health care in the United States?. Milbank Quarterly 1998;76(4):517-63, 509.
34. Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Campbell SM, Roland MO. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Quality in Health Care 2001;10:152-8.
35. Shea S, Du Mouchel W, Bahamonde L. A metaanalysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventative care in the ambulatory setting. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1996;3(6):399-409.
36. Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, Essaihi A, Hsiao A, Michel G, et al. The GuideLine Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guideline implementation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2005;5:23.
37. Shojania KG, Jennings A, Mayhew A, Ramsay CR, Eccles MP, Grimshaw J. The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001096.pub2]
38. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). SIGN implementation support. http://www.sign.ac.uk/implementation/index.html (assessed 30 March 2012).
39. Titler M, Everett LQ. Translating research into practice. Considerations for critical care investigators. Critical Care Nursing Clinics North America 2001;13(4):587-604.
40. Titler MG, Herr K, Brooks JM, Xie X-J, Ardery G, Schilling ML, et al. Translating research into practice intervention improves management of acute pain in older hip fracture patients. Health Research and Educational Trust 2009;44(1):264-87.
41. Wang D, Peleg M, Tu SW, Boxwala AA, Greenes RA, Patel VL, et al. Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2002;68:59-70.
42. Wensing M, Oxman A, Baker R, Godycki-Cwirko M, Flottorp S, Szecsenyi J, et al. Tailored Implementation For Chronic Diseases (TICD): a project protocol. Implementation Science 2011;6(103):1-8.