An Assessment of Internet of Things Protocols for Resource-Constrained Applications

Proceedings - International Computer Software and Applications Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2016, Pages 555-560

  Mun, Dae Hyeok ^a   Le Dinh, Minh ^a   Kwon, Young Woo ^a  

^a Utah State University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; energy efficiency; internet of things; performance; protocols; resources

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; INTERNET; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SOFTWARE DESIGN; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL;

ASSESSMENT; DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS; EFFICIENT COMMUNICATIONS; INFORMED DECISION; INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT); PERFORMANCE; RESOURCE CONSTRAINT; RESOURCES;

INTERNET OF THINGS;

EID: 84987971212     PISSN: 07303157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/COMPSAC.2016.51     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Gartner, Inc., "Gartner Says the Internet of Things Installed Base Will Grow to 26 Billion Units By 2020," Dec. 2013.
2. ABB Research, "30 Billion Devices Will Wirelessly Connect to the Internet of Everything in 2020," May 2013.
3. G. D. Abowd, A. K. Dey, P. J. Brown, N. Davies, M. Smith, and P. Steggles, "Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness," in Handheld and ubiquitous computing, 1999.
4. Z. Shelby, K. Hartke, and C. Bormann, "The constrained application protocol (CoAP)," 2014.
5. OASIS, MQTT Version 3.1.1, Std., 2014.
6. A. Stanford-Clark and H. L. Truong, "Mqtt for sensor networks (MQTT-SN) protocol specification version 1.2," 2013.
7. I. Fette and A. Melnikov, "The Websocket Protocol," 2011.
8. patric-r/jvmtop. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/patric-r/jvmtop
9. Y.-W. Kwon and E. Tilevich, "The impact of distributed programming abstractions on application energy consumption," Information and Software Technology, 2013.
10. A. Bhattacharyya and S. Bandyopadhyay, "Lightweight internet protocols for web enablement of sensors using constrained gateway devices," in Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), 2013.
11. N. De Caro, W. Colitti, K. Steenhaut, G. Mangino, and G. Reali, "Comparison of two lightweight protocols for smartphonebased sensing," in 2013 IEEE 20th Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology in the Benelux (SCVT), 2013.
12. M. Collina, M. Bartolucci, A. Vanelli-Coralli, and G. Corazza, "Internet of things application layer protocol analysis over error and delay prone links," in 2014 7th Advanced Satellite Multimedia Systems Conference and the 13th Signal Processing for Space Communications Workshop (ASMS/SPSC), 2014.
13. L. Durkop, B. Czybik, and J. Jasperneite, "Performance evaluation of m2m protocols over cellular networks in a lab environment," in 2015 18th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks (ICIN), 2015.
14. D. Thangavel, X. Ma, A. Valera, H.-X. Tan, and C.-Y. Tan, "Performance evaluation of mqtt and coap via a common middleware," in 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), 2014.
15. Y.-W. Kwon, E. Tilevich, and W. R. Cook, "Which middleware platform should you choose for your next remote service?" Service Oriented Computing and Applications, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 61-70, 2011.