Exploring the value of drawing in learning and assessment

Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS

Volumn 2, Issue , 2016, Pages 1082-1089

  Ainsworth, Shaaron ^a   Stieff, Mike ^b   Desutter, Dane ^b   Tytler, Russell ^c   Prain, Vaughan ^d   Panagiotopoulos, Dimitrios ^a   Wigmore, Peter ^a   Van Joolingen, Wouter ^e   Heijnes, Dewi ^e   Leenaars, Frank ^e   Puntambekar, Sadhana ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SCIENCE; PROCESS DATA; REPRESENTATIONAL PRACTICES; SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84987968772     PISSN: 18149316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. American Chemical Society [ACS]. (2001). General Chemistry Exam (Conceptual). Ames, IA: ACS Exams Institute.
2. Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to Learn in Science. Science, 333, 1096-1097.
3. Bollen, L., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2013). SimSketch: multiagent simulations based on learner-created sketches for early science education. IEEE transactions on learning technologies (3), 208-216.
4. Cooper, M. M., Williams, L. C., & Underwood, S. M. (2015). Student Understanding of Intermolecular Forces: A Multimodal Study. Journal of Chemical Education. 92(8), 1288-1298
5. Gooding, D. C. (2004). Cognition, construction and culture: Visual theories in the sciences. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4(3), 551-593.
6. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and instruction, 17(4), 379-432.
7. Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105-143.
8. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371-388). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9. Lemke, J. (2004). The literacies of science. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 33-47). Newark, DE: International Reading Association and National Science Teachers Association.
10. Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2011). Modeling-based learning in science education: cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions. Educational Review, 64, 1-22.
11. Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of research in education, 31(1), 1-44.
12. Nersessian, N. (2008). Model-based reasoning in scientific practice. In R. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry (pp. 57-79). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
13. Mulder, Y. G., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2014). Using heuristic worked examples to promote inquiry-based learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 56-64.
14. Older, J. (2004). Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation. The Surgeon, 2(2), 79-90.
15. Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International journal of science education, 34(17), 2751-2773.
16. Stieff, M. (2011). Improving representational competence using molecular simulations embedded in inquiry activities. Journal of research in science teaching, 48(10), 1137-1158.
17. Van Meter, P., & Firetto, C. M. (2013). Cognitive model of drawing construction: learning through the construction of drawings. In G. Schraw, M. McCrudden, & D. Robinson (Eds.), Learning through visual displays (pp. 247-280). Scottsdale, AZ: Information Age Publishing.
18. Waldrip, B. G., & Prain, V. (2012). Learning from and through representations in science. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (2nd ed., pp. 145-155). Dordrecht: Springer.
19. Zhang, Z. H., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Can ge nerating represe nt ations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1177-1198.
20. Zhang, Z. H., & Linn, M. C. (2013). Learning from chemical visualizations: Comparing generation and selection. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2174-2197.