Psychometric Testing of the Self-care of Hypertension Inventory: Conceptual Challenges to Collaborative Care

Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 431-438

  Dickson, Victoria Vaughan ^a   Lee, Christopher ^b   Yehle, Karen S ^c,d   Abel, Willie M ^e   Riegel, Barbara ^f  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

adherence; blood pressure; decision making; hypertension; instrument development; measurement; self care; self management

Indexed keywords

AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; STANDARDS; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84987898722     PISSN: 08894655     EISSN: 15505049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000364     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014; 311(5):507-520.
2. World Health Organization. Burden: mortality, morbidity and risk factors. In: Alwan A, ed. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010: Description of the global burden of NCDs, their risk factors and determinants. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2011.
3. Nwankwo T, Yoon SS, Burt V, Gu Q. Hypertension among adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2012. NCHS data brief. 2013; (133):1-8.
4. Riegel B, Jaarsma T, Stromberg A. A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. ANS. Adv Nurs Sci. 2012;35(3): 194-204.
5. Go AS, Bauman MA, Coleman King SM, et al. An effective approach to high blood pressure control: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hypertension. 2014;63(4):878-885.
6. Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 suppl 2):S76-S99.
7. Bosworth HB, Olsen MK, Neary A, et al. Take Control of Your Blood Pressure (TCYB) study: a multifactorial tailored behavioral and educational intervention for achieving blood pressure control. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(3):338-347.
8. Uhlig K, Patel K, Ip S, Kitsios GD, Balk EM. Self-measured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(3):185-194.
9. Dickson V, Nocella J, Yoon H-W, et al. Cardiovascular disease self-care interventions. Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013 Article no. 407608.
10. Han HR, Song HJ, Nguyen T, Kim MT. Measuring self-care in patients with hypertension: a systematic review of literature. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014;29(1):55-67.
11. Han HR, Lee H, Commodore-Mensah Y, Kim M. Development and validation of the Hypertension Self-care Profile: a practical tool to measure hypertension self-care. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014;29(3):E11-E20.
12. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what"s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-497.
13. Lynn M. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-385.
14. Polit D, Beck C, Owen S. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-467.
15. Waltz C, Bausell R. Nursing Research: Design, Statistics and Computer Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 1981.
16. Kravitz R, Hays R, Sherbourne C, et al. Recall of recommendations and adherence to advice among patients with chronic medical conditions. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(16): 1869-1878.
17. Miller D, Byrnes J. Adolescents" decision making in social situations: a self-regulation perspective. Appl Dev Psychol. 2001;22:237-256.
18. Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
19. Dickson V, Lee C, Yehle K, Faulkner K, Mola A, Riegel B. Psychometric testing of the Self-Care of Chronic Angina Index (SCCAI) [abstract]. Circulation. 2015;132(suppl 3): A13707.
20. Ben Gal T, Jaarsma T. Self-care and communication issues at the end of life of recipients of a left-ventricular assist device as destination therapy. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013;7(1):29-35.
21. Flora D, Curran P. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods. 2004;9:466-491.
22. Schnermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Muller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online. 2003;8(2):23-74.
23. Hu L, Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Model. 1999;6(1):1-55.
24. Yu C. Evaluating Cutoff Criteria of Model Fit Indices for Latent Variable Models With Binary and Continuous Outcome [dissertation]. Los Angeles, CA: University of California; 2002.
25. Garrido L, Abad F, Ponsoda V. Are fit indices really fit to estimate the number of factors with categorical variables? Some cautionary findings via Monte Carlo simulation. Psychol Methods. 2015;21(1):93-111.
26. Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2013.
27. Brown T. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: multiple factors or method effects? Behav Res Ther. 2003;41:1411-1426.
28. Barbaranelli C, Lee C, Vellone E, Riegel B. Dimensionality and reliability the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index scales: further evidence from confirmatory factor analysis. Res Nurs Health. 2014;37(6):524-537.
29. Harsha DW, Bray GA. Weight loss and blood pressure control (Pro). Hypertension. 2008;51(6):1420-1425.
30. Neter JE, Stam BE, Kok FJ, Grobbee DE, Geleijnse JM. Influence of weight reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Hypertension. 2003;42(5):878-884.
31. Riegel B, Dickson VV, Topaz M. Qualitative analysis of naturalistic decision making in adults with chronic heart failure. Nurs Res. 2013;62(2):91-98.
32. Riegel B, Lee C, Dickson V, Carlson B. An update on the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009; 24(6):485-497.
33. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1986.
34. Schoenthaler A, Lancaster K, Midberry S, et al. The FAITH Trial: baseline characteristics of a church-based trial to improve blood pressure control in blacks. Ethnicity Dis. 2015; 25(3):337-344.
35. Fernandez S, Tobin JN, Cassells A, Diaz-Gloster M, Kalida C, Ogedegbe G. The counseling African Americans to Control Hypertension (CAATCH) Trial: baseline demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and behavioral characteristics. Implement Sci. 2011;6:100.
36. Knafl GJ, Schoenthaler A, Ogedegbe G. Secondary analysis of electronically monitored medication adherence data for a cohort of hypertensive African-Americans. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:207-219.