Education and training for social work: A response to Tony Novak

Social Work Education

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 34-39

  Weinstein, Jenny ^a  

^a CCETSW ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84987840171     PISSN: 02615479     EISSN: 14701227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02615479611220231     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. CCETSW. 1989. Rules and Requirements for the Diploma in Social Work, London: CCETSW. Paper 30
2. CCETSW. 1995a. Assuring Quality in the Diploma in Social Work: 1 Rules and Requirements for the DipSW, London: CCETSW.
3. CCETSW. 1995b. Assuring Quality in the Diploma in Social Work: 2 Approval Review and Inspection of DipSW Programmes, London: CCETSW.
4. Higher Education for Capability. 1996. Professional Capability: Requirements and Accreditation, London: Regent's College. Conference 12 January 1996 HEC 20, Queen Square, Leeds LS2 8AF.
5. Jones, C., 1996. “ Anti-intellectualism and the peculiarities of British social work ”. In Social Theory, Social Change and Social Work, Edited by: Parton, N., London: Routledge. in
6. Larson, M.S., 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis, Berkley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
7. Novak, T., 1995. Thinking about a new social work curriculum. Social Work Education, 14 (4): 4–10.
8. Pierce, R., 1995. Review of the Diploma in Social Work 1994/5: An Account by Rachel Pierce, London: CCETSW.
9. Schon, D., 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.