Domain Specificity and Intuitive Ontology

The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 96-118

  Boyer, Pascal ^a   Barrett, H Clark ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Domain specific inference systems; Evolutionary psychology; Face recognition system; Human evolved intuitive ontology; Numerical cognition; Ontological distinction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84987816185     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470939376.ch3     Document Type: Chapter

References (137)

1. Adolphs, R., Sears, L., & Piven, J. (2001). Abnormal processing of social information from faces in autism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(2), 232-240.
2. Ahlstrom,V., Blake, R.,&Ahlstrom,U. (1997). Perception of biologicalmotion. Perception, 26, 1539-1548.
3. Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 267-278.
4. Atran, S. A. (1990). Cognitive foundations of natural history towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Atran, S. A. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(4), 547-609.
6. Avis, M., & Harris, P. (1991). Belief-desire reasoning among Baka children: Evidence for a universal conception of mind. Child Development, 62, 460-467.
7. Baillargeon, R., Kotovsky, L., & Needham, A. (1995). The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. James-Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 79-115). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8. Baldwin, D. A., Baird, J. A., Saylor, M. M., & Clark, M. A. (2001). Infants parse dynamic action. Child Development, 72(3), 708-717.
9. Baron-Cohen, S. (1991). Precursors to a theory of mind: Understanding attention in others. In A. Whiten (Ed.), Natural theories of mind. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
10. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"? Cognition, 21, 37-46.
11. Barrett, H. C. (1999). Human cognitive adaptations to predators and prey. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
12. Bellefeuille, A., & Faubert, J. (1998). Independence of contour and biological-motion cues for motion-defined animal shapes. Perception, 27, 225-235.
13. Blakemore, S.-J., Boyer, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2003). Detection of contingency and animacy in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 837-844.
14. Blakemore, S.-J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(8), 561-567.
15. Blakemore, S.-J., Fonlupt, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Darmon, C., Boyer, P., Meltzoff, A. N., et al. (2001). How the brain perceives causality: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 12(17), 3741-3746.
16. Bloom, P. (1996). Intention, history and artifact concepts. Cognition, 60, 1-29.
17. Blythe, P. W., Todd, P. M., & Miller, G. F. (1999). How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions. In G. Gigerenzer & P. Todd (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 257-285). New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Cabeza, R., & Nyberg, L. (2000). Imaging cognition: II. An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 1-47.
19. Campbell, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53(1), 1-44.
20. Caramazza, A. (1998). The interpretation of semantic category-specific deficits: What do they reveal about the organization of conceptual knowledge in the brain? Neurocase: Case Studies in Neuropsychology, Neuropsychiatry, and Behavioural Neurology, 4(4/5), 265-272.
21. Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(1), 1-34.
22. Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63(4), i-vi, 1-143.
23. Crump, T. (1990). The anthropology of numbers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Bíró, S., Koós, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of "pure reason" in infancy. Cognition, 72(3), 237-267.
25. D'Entremont, B., & Muir, D. W. (1997). Five-month-olds' attention and affective responses to stillfaced emotional expressions. Infant Behavior and Development, 20(4), 563-568.
26. Decety, J., & Grezes, J. (1999). Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 172-178.
27. Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science, 284(5416), 970-974.
28. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Devlin, J. T., Russell, R. P., Davis, M. H., Price, C. J., & Moss, K. (2002). Is there an anatomical basis for category-specificity? Semantic memory studies in P.E.T. and fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 40(1), 54-75.
30. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of experimental psychology General, 115(2), 107-117.
31. Duchaine, B. C. (2000). Developmental prosopagnosia with normal configural processing. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 11(1), 79-83.
32. Ekman, P. (1999). Facial expressions. In T. Dalgleish & M. J. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 301-320). New York: Wiley.
33. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Farah, M. (1994). Specialization within visual object recognition: Clues from prosopagnosia and alexia. In G. R. Martha & J. Farah (Eds.), The neuropsychology of high-level vision: Collected tutorial essays. Carnegie Mellon symposia on cognition (pp. 133-146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Farah, M., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H. M., & Tanaka, J. R. (1995). The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Vision Research, 35, 2089-2093.
36. Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(3), 490-495.
37. Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44(1/2), 43-74.
38. Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(6), 568-573.
39. Gauthier, I., Williams, P., Tarr, M. J., & Tanaka, J. (1998). Training "greeble" experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research Special issue: Models of recognition, 38(15/16), 2401-2428.
40. Gelman, R. (1978). Cognitive development. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 297-332.
41. Gelman, R. (1990). First principles organize attention and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Science, 14, 79-106.
42. Gelman, R., & Baillargeon, R. (1983). A revision of some Piagetian concepts. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Cognitive development. New York: Wiley.
43. Gelman, R., Durgin, F., & Kaufman, L. (1995). Distinguishing between animates and inanimates: Not by motion alone. In D. Sperber, D. Premack & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 150-184). New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
44. Gelman, R., & Meck, B. (1992). Early principles aid initial but not later conceptions of number. In J. Bideaud, C. Meljac & R. Gelman (Eds.), Pathways to number: Children's developing numerical abilities (pp. 171-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Gelman, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2000). Young children are sensitive to how an object was created when deciding what to name it. Cognition, 76(2), 91-103.
46. Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essence: Early understandings of the nonobvious. Cognition, 38(3), 213-244.
47. Gentner, D., & Rattermann, M. J. (1991). Language and the career of similarity. In S. A. Gelman, & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 225-277). New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Gerlach, C., Law, I., Gade, A., & Paulson, O. B. (2000). Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition: A PET study. Neuropsychologia, 38(13), 1693-1703.
49. Gobel, S., Walsh, V., & Rushworth, M. F. (2001). The mental number line and the human angular gyrus. NeuroImage, 14(6), 1278-1289.
50. Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. (1994). The theory theory. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain-specificity in cognition and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Grezes, J., Costes, N., & Decety, J. (1998). Top-down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: A PET investigation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 15(6/8), 553-582.
52. Grossman, E. D., & Blake, R. (2001). Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Research, 41(10/11), 1475-1482.
53. Happé, F., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (1999). Acquired "theory of mind" impairments following stroke. Cognition, 70(3), 211-240.
54. Happé, F., Ehlers, S., Fletcher, P., Frith, U., Johansson, M., Gillberg, C., et al. (1996). "Theory of mind" in the brain: Evidence from a PET scan study of Asperger syndrome. Neuroreport: An International Journal for the Rapid Communication of Research in Neuroscience, 8, 197-201.
55. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological psychiatry, 51(1), 59-67.
56. Heptulla-Chatterjee, S., Freyd, J. J., & Shiffrar, M. (1996). Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 916-929.
57. Heslenfeld, D. J., Kenemans, J. L., Kok, A., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1997). Feature processing and attention in the human visual system: An overview. Biological Psychology, 45(1/3), 183-215.
58. Hirschfeld, L. A., & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.). (1994). Mapping the mind: Domain-specificity in culture and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
61. Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14(2), 201-211.
62. Johnson, S., Slaughter, V., & Carey, S. (1998). Whose gaze will infants follow? The elicitation of gaze-following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1(2), 233-238.
63. Kaiser, M. K., Jonides, J., & Alexander, J. (1986). Intuitive reasoning about abstract and familiar physics problems. Memory and Cognition, 14, 308-312.
64. Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(8), 759-763.
65. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302-4311.
66. Keil, F. C. (1986). The acquisition of natural kind and artifact terms. In A. W. D. Marrar (Ed.), Conceptual change (pp. 73-86). Norwaood, NJ: Ablex.
67. Keltner, D., Ekman, P., Gonzaga, G. C., Beer, J., Scherer, K. R., Johnstone, T., et al. (2003). Part IV: Expression of emotion. In R. J. Davidson & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 411-559). London: Oxford University Press, 2003, xvii, 1199.
68. Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1995). Principle-based inferences in young children's categorization: Revisiting the impact of function on the naming of artifacts. Cognitive Development, 10, 347-380.
69. Kesler/West, M. L., Andersen, A. H., Smith, C. D., Avison, M. J., Davis, C. E., Kryscio, R. J., et al. (2001). Neural substrates of facial emotion processing using fMRI. Cognitive Brain Research, 11(2), 213-226.
70. Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 187-208.
71. Lee, K., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). The development of external symbol systems: The child as a notator. In R. Gelman, & T. Kit-Fong Au (Eds.), Perceptual and cognitive development (pp. 185-211). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
72. Leslie, A. M. (1984). Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants. Perception, 13(3), 287-305.
73. Leslie, A. M., & Polizzi, P. (1998). Inhibitory processing in the false belief task: Two conjectures. Developmental Science, 1(2), 247-253.
74. Martin, A., Haxby, J. V., Lalonde, F. J., Wiggs, C. L., Parasuraman, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1994). A distributed cortical network for object knowledge. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 20(1/2), 5.
75. Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of categoryspecific knowledge. Nature (London), 379(6566), 649-652.
76. Meck, W. H. (1997). Application of a mode-control model of temporal integration to counting and timing behaviour. In C. M. Bradshaw& E. Szabadi (Eds.), Time and behaviour: Psychological and neurobehavioural analyses (pp. 133-184). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier Science.
77. Mecklinger, A., Gruenewald, C., Besson, M., Magnie, M.-N., & Von Cramon, Y. (2002). Separable neuronal circuitries for manipulable and non-manipulable objects in working memory. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1115-1123.
78. Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31(5), 838-850.
79. Meltzoff, A. N. (1999). Origins of theory of mind, cognition and communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32(4), 251-269.
80. Michelon, P., & Biederman, I. (2003). Less impairment in face imagery than face perception in early prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 41(4), 421-441.
81. Michotte, A. (1963). The perception of causality. New York: Basic Books.
82. Mithen, S. J. (1990). Thoughtful foragers: A study of prehistoric decision-making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Mithen, S. J. (1996). The prehistory of the mind. London: Thames and Hudson.
84. Moore, C. J., & Price, C. J. (1999). A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain, 122(5), 943-962.
85. Morris, J. S., Friston, K. J. B., Chel, C., Frith, C. D., Young, A. W., Calder, A. J., et al. (1998). A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. Brain; a journal of neurology, 121(Pt. 1), 47-57.
86. Morton, J., & Johnson, M. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant facerecognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164-181.
87. Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). A progressive category-specific semantic deficit for non-living things. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 60-82.
88. Nelson, C. A. (2001). The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant and Child Development Special issue: Face Processing in Infancy and Early Childhood, 10(1/2), 3 -18.
89. Nijokiktjien, C., Verschoor, A., Sonneville, L. D., Huyser, C., Veld, V. O. H., & Toorenaar, N. (2001). Disordered recognition of facial identity and emotions in three Asperger type autists. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 10(1), 79-90.
90. Pascalis, O., de Schonen, S., Morton, J., Deruelle, C., & Campbell, R. (1995). Mother's face recognition by neonates: A replication and an extension. Infant Behavior and Development, 18(1), 79-85.
91. Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Bettinardi, V., Bressi, S., Gorno-Tempini, M., Matarrese, M., et al. (1995). Different neural systems for the recognition of animals and man-made tools. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, 21(1/3), 1498.
92. Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987). Three year olds' difficulty with false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 125-137.
93. Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65, 1228-1238.
94. Phillips, A. T., Wellman, H. M., & Spelke, E. S. (2002). Infants' ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action. Cognition, 85(1), 53-78.
95. Piaget, J. (1930). The child's conception of physical causality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
96. Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707-784.
97. Posner, M. I., & Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of mind. New York: Scientific American Library/Scientific American Books.
98. Povinelli, D. J. (2000). Folk physics for apes: The chimpanzee's theory of how the world works. New York: Oxford University Press.
99. Povinelli, D. J., & Eddy, T. J. (1996a). Chimpanzees: Joint visual attention. Psychological Science, 7(3), 129-135.
100. Povinelli, D. J., & Eddy, T. J. (1996b). What young chimpanzees know about seeing. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(3), v-vi, 1-152.
101. Povinelli, D. J., & Preuss, T. M. (1995). Theory of mind: Evolutionary history of a cognitive specialization. Trends in Neurosciences, 18(9), 418-424.
102. Richards, D. D., Goldfarb, J., Richards, A. L., & Hassen, P. (1989). The role of the functionality rule in the categorization of well-defined concepts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 97-115.
103. Rochat, P., Morgan, R., & Carpenter, M. (1997). Young infants' sensitivity to movement information specifying social causality. Cognitive Development, 12(4), 441-465.
104. Sacchett, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: A category specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 73-86.
105. Sartori, G., Coltheart, M., Miozzo, M., & Job, R. (1994). Category specificity and informational specificity in neuropsychological impairment of semantic memory. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 537-550). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
106. Sartori, G., Job, R., Miozzo, M., & Zago, S. (1993). Category-specific form-knowledge deficit in a patient with herpes simplex virus encephalitis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15(2), 280-299.
107. Schlottman, A., & Anderson, N. H. (1993). An information integration approach to phenomenal causality. Memory and Cognition, 21(6), 785-801.
108. Schlottmann, A., & Surian, L. (1999). Do 9-month-olds perceive causation-at-a-distance? Perception, 28(9), 1105-1113.
109. Scholl, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art. Cognition, 80(1/2), 1-46.
110. Sheridan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). A verbal-semantic category-specific recognition impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10(2), 143-184.
111. Slater, A., & Quinn, P. C. (2001). Face recognition in the newborn infant. Infant and Child Development Special issue: Face Processing in Infancy and Early Childhood, 10(1/2), 21-24.
112. Spelke, E. S. (1988). The origins of physical knowledge. In L. Weizkrantz (Ed.), Thought without language.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
113. Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14, 29-56.
114. Spelke, E. S. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions. Cognition, 50, 431-445.
115. Spelke, E. S. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1233-1243.
116. Sperber, D. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain-specificity in cognition and culture.New York: Cambridge University Press.
117. Spitzer, M., Kischka, U., Gueckel, F., Bellemann, M. E., Kammer, T., Seyyedi, S., et al. (1998). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of category-specific cortical activation: Evidence for semantic maps. Cognitive Brain Research, 6(4), 309-319.
118. Spitzer, M., Kwong, K. K., Kennedy, W., & Rosen, B. R. (1995). Category-specific brain activation in fMRI during picture naming. Neuroreport: An International Journal for the Rapid Communication of Research in Neuroscience, 6(16), 2109-2112.
119. Tager-Flusberg, H., & Sullivan, K. (2000). A componential view of theory of mind: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognition, 76(1), 59-89.
120. Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25(5), 583-592.
121. Tarr, M. J., & Gauthier, I. (2000). FFA: A flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nature Neuroscience, 3(8), 764-769.
122. Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 495-510.
123. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker's paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. In W. G. Runciman & J. Maynard Smith (Eds.), Evolution of social behaviour patterns in primates and man (pp. 119-143). Oxford, England, England Oxford University Press.
124. Tremoulet, P. D., & Feldman, J. (2000). Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception, 29, 943-951.
125. Uller, C., & Nichols, S. (2000). Goal attribution in chimpanzees. Cognition, 76(2), B27-B34.
126. van Schaik, C. P., & Van Hooff, J. A. (1983). On the ultimate causes of primate social systems. Behaviour, 85(1/2), 91-117.
127. Want, S. C., & Harris, P. L. (2001). Learning from other people's mistakes: Causal understanding in learning to use a tool. Child Development, 72(2), 431-443.
128. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1983). Category-specific access dysphasia. Brain, 106, 859-878.
129. Warrington, E. K., & McCarthy, R. (1987). Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain, 110, 1273-1296.
130. Whiten, A. (Ed.). (1991). Natural theories of mind: The evolution, development and simulation of everyday mind-reading. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
131. Williams, E. M. (2000). Causal reasoning by children and adults about the trajectory, context, and animacy of a moving object. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
132. Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358(6389), 749-750.
133. Wynn, K. (2002). Do infants have numerical expectations or just perceptual preferences?: Comment. Developmental Science, 5(2), 207-209.
134. Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants' metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30(2), 111-153.
135. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16(6), 747-759.
136. Zacks, J. M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., et al. (2001). Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nature neuroscience, 4(6), 651-655.
137. Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., & Umilta, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417(6885), 138-139.