A practice facilitation and academic detailing intervention can improve cancer screening rates in primary care safety net clinics

Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 533-542

  Mader, Emily M ^a   Fox, Chester H ^b   Epling, John W ^a,c   Noronha, Gary J ^d   Swanger, Carlos M ^d   Wisniewski, Angela M ^b   Vitale, Karen ^d   Norton, Amanda L ^a   Morley, Christopher P ^a,c,e  

^a SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

^e State University of New York Upstate Medical University: College of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Analysis of Variance; Breast Cancer; Cancer Prevention Control; Cervical Cancer; Colorectal Cancer; Early Detection of Cancer; Focus Groups; Improvement; Primary Health Care; Quality; Reminder Systems; Surveys Questionnaires; Workflow

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL AUDIT; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PROGRAM FEASIBILITY; REVIEW; SAFETY NET HOSPITAL; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; WORKFLOW; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SAFETY-NET PROVIDERS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84987664733     PISSN: 15572625     EISSN: 15587118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.05.160109     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Gonzalez P, Castaneda SF, Mills PJ, Talavera GA, Elder JP, Gallo LC. Determinants of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening adherence in Mexican American women. J Community Health 2012; 37:421-33.
2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Published recommendations. July 2016. Available from: Http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/BrowseRec/Index. Accessed July 13, 2016.
3. NCI Staff. Screening rates for several cancers miss their targets. Cancer Currents blog. May 26, 2015. Available from: Http://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2015/screening-targets. Accessed January 21, 2016.
4. Gupta S, Sussman DA, Doubeni CA, et al. Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:dju032.
5. Tammana VS, Laiyemo AO. Colorectal cancer disparities: Issues, controversies and solutions. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:869-76.
6. Wernli KJ, Hubbard RA, Johnson E, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in newly eligible men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23:1230-7.
7. Aboagye JK, Kaiser HE, Hayanga AJ. Rural-urban differences in access to specialist providers of colorectal cancer care in the United States: A physician workforce issue. JAMA Surg 2014;149:537-43.
8. Miranda-Diaz C, Betancourt E, Ruiz-Candelaria Y, Hunter-Mellado R. Barriers for compliance with breast, colorectal, and cervical screening cancer tests among Hispanic patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015;13:E21.
9. Singh G, Williams S, Siahpush M, Mulhollen A. Socioeconomic, rural-urban, and racial inequalities in US cancer mortality: Part I - all cancers and lung cancer and part II - colorectal, prostate, breast and cervical cancers. J Cancer Epidemiol 2011;2011:107497.
10. Klabunde C, Vernon S, Nadel M, Breen N, Seeff L, Brown M. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: A comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care 2005;43:939-44.
11. Anderson BL, Pearlman M, Griffin J, Schulkin J. Conflicting and changing breast cancer screening recommendations: Survey study of a national sample of ob-gyns after the release of the 2009 USPSTF guidelines. J Healthc Qual 2013;35:25-35.
12. Zitzelsberger L, Grunfeld E, Graham ID. Family physicians' perspectives on practice guidelines related to cancer control. BMC Fam Pract 2004;5:25.
13. Zhao Y, Goist M. Knowledge of cervical cancer screening guidelines among residents at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123(Suppl):94S.
14. Mold JW, Fox C, Wisniewski A, et al. Implementing asthma guidelines using practice facilitation and local learning collaboratives: A randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:233-40.
15. Meropol SB, Schiltz NK, Sattar A, et al. Practicetailored facilitation to improve pediatric preventive care delivery: A randomized trial. Pediatrics 2014; 133:e1664-75.
16. Baskerville N, Liddy C, Hogg W. Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings. Ann Fam Med 2012; 10:63-74.
17. Duckett A, Cuoco T, Pride P, et al. Academic detailing to teach aging and geriatrics. Gerontol Geriatr Educ 2015;36:331-42.
18. O'Brien M, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, et al. Educational outreach visits: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD000409.
19. Academic detailing: Frequently asked questions. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. Available from: Http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/quit-smoking/cessation/pdfs/academic-detailingfaq508. pdf. Accessed July 13, 2016.
20. Mold JW, Aspy CA, Nagykaldi Z. Implementation of evidence-based preventive services delivery processes in primary care: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/ Research Network (OKPRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:334-44.
21. Community Preventive Services Task Force. Updated recommendations for client- and provideroriented interventions to increase breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 2012;43:760-4.
22. National survey of primary care physicians' recommendations and practice for breast, cervical, colorectal & lung cancer screening. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences. Updated March 2, 2015. Available from: Http://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/screening-rp/. Accessed July 13, 2016.
23. National surveys of colorectal cancer screening policies & practices. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute. Updated December 8, 2015. Available from: Http://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/crc-surveys/. Accessed July 13, 2016.
24. Houser SH, Colquitt S, Clements K, Hart-Hester S. The impact of electronic health record usage on cancer registry systems in Alabama. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2012;9:1f.
25. Quality improvement & performance management survey. Okemos, MI; Michigan Department of Community Health, Public Health Administration; 2012. Available from: Http://www.astho.org/Quality-Improvement/Toolkit/Michigan-Department-of-Community-Health-Quality-Improvement-and-Performance-Management-Survey/. Accessed July 13, 2016.
26. Fox C, Vest B, Kahn L, et al. Improving evidencebased primary care for chronic kidney disease: Study protocol for a cluster randomized control trial for translating evidence into practice (TRANSLATE CKD). Implement Sci 2013;8:88.
27. Peterson K, Radosevich D, O'Connor P, et al. Improving diabetes care in practice: Findings from the TRANSLATE trial. Diabetes Care 2008;31: 2238- 43.
28. State cancer profiles. Quick profiles: New York. Washington, DC: National Cancer Institute; 2016. Available from: Https://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov/quick-profiles/index.php?statename-newyork#t-1. Accessed July 13, 2016.
29. Summary report: Use of electronic medical records to facilitate colorectal cancer screening in community health centers. Prepared for: National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable, American Cancer Society, Inc., National Association of Community Health Centers. Deerfield, IL; Aeffect Inc.; 2013. Available from: Http://nccrt.org/about/disparities/report-on-use-ofelectronic-medical-records-to-facilitate-colorectalcancer-screening-in-community-health-centers/. Accessed July 13, 2016.