Soil Humic and Fulvic Acids from Different Land-Use Systems Evaluated By E4/E6 Ratios

Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Volumn 47, Issue 13-14, 2016, Pages 1675-1679

  Zalba, Pablo ^a   Amiotti, Nilda M ^a   Galantini, Juan A ^b   Pistola, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

^b Centro Científico y Tecnológico Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Fulvic acid; humic acid; pinus afforestation

Indexed keywords

AFFORESTATION; AGE STRUCTURE; AGRICULTURAL SOIL; CLAY MINERAL; CONIFEROUS FOREST; DENSITY; FULVIC ACID; HUMIC ACID; HUMIFICATION; LAND USE CHANGE; PH; SOIL CARBON; SOIL ORGANIC MATTER; TOPSOIL; VALUATION; WOODLAND;

ARGENTINA; BUENOS AIRES [ARGENTINA];

EID: 84986224312     PISSN: 00103624     EISSN: 15322416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2016.1206558     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. N.M.Amiotti, P.Zalba, L.F.Sanchez, and N.Peinemann. 2000. The impact of single trees on properties of loess-derived grassland soils in Argentina. Ecology 81:3283–90. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3283:TIOSTO]2.0.CO;2.
2. S.Bidart, 1996. Estudio sedimentológico y mineralógico de los materiales parentales de los suelos no aluviales de la cuenca del Río Sauce Grande, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Dissertation Vol. I and II. Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
3. Y.Chen, N.Senesi, and M.Schnitzer. 1977. Information provided on humic substances by E4/E6 ratios. Soil Science Society of America journal 41:352–58. doi:10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100020037x.
4. T.Chirenje, C.Rivero, and L.Q.Ma. 2002. Leachability of Cu and Ni in wood ash-amended soil as impacted by humic and fulvic acid. Geoderma 108:31–47. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(02)00120-9.
5. J.A.Galantini, M.E.Duval, J.O.Iglesias, and H.Kruger. 2014. Continuous wheat in semiarid regions:Long-term effects on stock and quality of soil organic carbon. Soil Science 179:284–92. doi:10.1097/SS.0000000000000072.
6. M.H.B.Hayes, 1997. Emerging concept of the composition and structures of humic substances. In Humic substances, peats and sludges, eds H.M.B.Hayes and W.S.Wilson, 3–30. Cambridge, UK:Royal Society of Chemistry.
7. J.Kukkonen, and A.Oikari. 1991. Bioavailability of organic pollutants in boreal waters with varying levels of dissolved organic material. Water Research 25:455–63. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(91)90082-2.
8. E.H.Novotny, W.E.H.Blum, M.H.Gerzabek, and A.S.Mangrich. 1999. Soil management system effects on size fractionated humic substances. Geoderma 92:87–109. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00022-1.
9. D.C.Olk, 2006. A chemical fractionation for structure-function relations of soil organic matter in nutrient cycling. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:1013–22. doi:10.2136/sssaj2005.0108.
10. S.Reddy, 2014. Elemental analysis, E4/E6 ratio and total acidity of soil humic and fulvic acids from different land use systems. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 16:89–92.
11. C.Rivero, T.Chirenje, L.Q.Ma, and G.Martinez. 2004. Influence of compost on soil organic matter quality under tropical conditions. Geoderma 123:355–61. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.002.
12. R.Sharanbhoopal, M.S.Nagaraja, T.S.Punith Raj, A.S.Police Patil, and P.Dhumgond. 2014. Elemental analysis, E4/E6 ratio and total acidity of soil humic and fulvic acids from different land use systems. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 16:89–92.
13. A.Slepetiene, and J.Slepetys. 2005. Status of humus in soil under various long-term tillage systems. Geoderma 127:207–15. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.001.
14. F.J.Stevenson, 1994. Humus chemistry. genesis, composition, reactions. 2nd Edition. New York:Wiley.
15. R.S.Swift, 1996. Organic matter characterization. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 – Chemical methods, ed. D.L.Sparks, 1011–69. SSSA book Serie Nº 5, Madison, WI, USA:SSSA and ASA.