Pathways to Program Success: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) of Communities Putting Prevention to Work Case Study Programs

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 104-111

  Kane, Heather ^a   Hinnant, Laurie ^a   Day, Kristine ^b   Council, Mary ^a   Tzeng, Janice ^a   Soler, Robin ^b   Chambard, Megan ^a   Roussel, Amy ^a   Heirendt, Wendy ^b  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

capacity; case study; public health; QCA

Indexed keywords

AWARDS AND PRIZES; COMMUNITY CARE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STANDARDS;

AWARDS AND PRIZES; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 84986206019     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: 15505022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000449     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bunnell R, O'Neil D, Soler R, Fifty Communities Putting Prevention to Work: accelerating chronic disease prevention through policy, systems and environmental change. J Commun Health. 2012; 37 (5): 1081-1090.
2. Soler R, Orenstein D, Honeycutt A, Community-based interventions to decrease obesity and tobacco exposure and reduce health care costs: outcome estimates from Communities Putting Prevention to Work for 2010-2020. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016; 13: 150272.
3. Horton D, Alexaki A, Bennett-Lartey S, Evaluating capacity development: experiences from research and development organizations around the world. Chapter 2. http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-31556-201-1-DO-TOPIC.html. Published 2003. Accessed November 4, 2010.
4. Goodman RM,. A construct for building the capacity of community-based initiatives in racial and ethnic communities: a qualitative cross-case analysis. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008; 14 (suppl): S18-S25.
5. Montemurro GR, Raine KD, Nykiforouk CIJ, Mayan M,. Exploring the process of capacity-building among community-based health promotion workers in Alberta, Canada [published online ahead of print February 27, 2013.]. Health Promot Int. doi:10.1093/heapro/dat008.
6. Foster-Fishman PG, Berkowitz SL, Lounsbury DW, Jacobson S, Allen NA,. Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: a review and integrative framework. Am J Community Psychol. 2001; 29 (2): 241-261.
7. Freudenberg N,. Community capacity for environmental health promotion: determinants and implications for practice. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31 (4): 472-490.
8. Giamartino G, Wandersman A,. Organizational climate correlates of viable urban block organizations. Am J Community Psychol. 1983; 11 (5): 529-541.
9. Gottlieb NH, Brink SG, Gingiss PL,. Correlates of coalition effectiveness: the Smoke Free Class of 2000 Program. Health Educ Res. 1993; 8 (3): 375-384.
10. Hays CE, Hays SP, DeVille JO, Mulhall PF,. Capacity for effectiveness: the relationship between coalition structure and community impact. Eval Program Plann. 2000; 23 (3): 373-379.
11. Kegler MC, Steckler A, McLeroy K, Malek SH,. Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: a study of 10 project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. Health Educ Behav. 1998; 25 (3): 338-353.
12. Minkler M, Vasquez VB, Tajik M, Petersen D,. Promoting environmental justice through community-based participatory research: the role of community and partnership capacity. Health Educ Behav. 2008; 35 (1): 119-137.
13. Raynor J, York P, Sim S,. What Makes an Effective Advocacy Organization? A Framework for Determining Advocacy Capacity. Los Angeles, CA: The California Endowment; 2009.
14. Reisman J, Gienapp A, Stachowiak S,. A Guide to Measuring Advocacy and Policy. Baltimore, MD: Annie E Casey Foundation; 2007.
15. Rogers T, Howard-Pitney B, Feighery EC, Characteristics and participant perceptions of tobacco control coalitions in California. Health Educ Res. 1993; 8 (3): 345-357.
16. Longest KC, Thoits PA,. Gender, the stress process, and health: a configurational approach. Soc Ment Health. 2012; 2 (3): 187-206.
17. Ragin C,. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2000.
18. Kane H, Lewis MA, Williams PA, Kahwati LC,. Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand and quantify translation and implementation. Transl Behav Med. 2014; 4 (2): 201-208.
19. Rihoux B, Ragin CC,. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
20. Dusa A, Thiem A,. Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Vol 2015. R Package; 2014. http://cran.r-project.org/package=QCA. Accessed April 4, 2016.
21. Quaranta M,. SetMethods: A Package Companion to Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences. R Package; 2013. http://cran.r-project.org/package=SetMethods. Accessed April 4, 2016.
22. Schneider CQ, Wagemann C,. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2012.