Comparative advertising in India: Need to strengthen regulations

Vikalpa

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 67-75

  Pathak, Akhileshwar ^a,b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Comparative advertisement; Globalization; Liberalization; MRTP act; Unfair trade practices

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986205840     PISSN: 02560909     EISSN: 23953799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0256090920050106     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd., judgement of the MRTP Commission, 18/11/1998. Citation: 1999(2) CPJ 7.
2. Chidambaram, P (2003). “Law and Commerce: And the Twain shall Meet,” The Sunday Express, Ahmedabad, October 26.
3. M Balasundaram vs Jyothi Laboratories Ltd., judgement of the MRTP Commission, 10/10/1994. Citation: 1995 (82) CC 830.
4. Lakhanpal National Ltd. vs MRTP Commission, judgement of the Supreme Court, 02/05/1989. Citation: 1989 AIR (SC) 1692.
5. Palmolive (India) Ltd. vs Vicco Laboratories, judgement of the MRTP Commission, 20/03/1997. Citation: 1997 (5) CTJ 488.
6. Reviewed in Reckitt and Coleman India Ltd. vs Jyothi Laboratories Ltd., judgement of the MRTP Commission, 18/11/1998. Citation: 1999(34) CLA 46.
7. Chambers English Dictionary published by Allied Publishers Ltd. in its 1992 reprint, p 409.
8. In the New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary published by Clarindon Press, Oxford, 1993, p 696.
9. Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd., judgement of the MRTP Commission, 18/11/1998. Citation: 1999(2) CPJ 7.
10. In New Webster’s Dictionary of the English language, p 667.
11. In Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th edition, p 1097.
12. Godrej Soaps Ltd. vs Hygienic Research Institute, judgement of the MRTP Commission, 30/05/2001. Citation: 2001(43) CLA 300.
13. Tata Press Ltd. vs Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd., judgement of the Supreme Court, 03/08/1995. Citation: 1995 AIR(SC) 2438.
14. Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf) Lal Kuan vs Union of India, a judgement of the Supreme Court, Citation: SCR 1960(2) 671.
15. Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs Mudra Communications Ltd., decision of the MRTPC, 28/08/2001, Citation: 2002 (50) CLA 1.
16. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. vs Hindustan Lever Ltd., judgement of the MRTP Commission, 06/11/1997, Citation: 1998(92) CC 54.
17. Hindustan Lever Ltd. vs Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd., judgement of the Supreme Court delivered on December 17, 1997. Citation: AIR 1998 SC 526.
18. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. vs Hindustan Lever Ltd., a judgement of the MRTP Commission, 18/11/1998, Citation: 1999(2) CPJ 19.
19. Report of the High Level Committee on Competition Policy and Law, May 2000, available at www.nic.in/ dca/comp.