Antecedents of co-ordination in academic international project research

Journal of Managerial Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue , 1998, Pages 188-198

  Turati, Carlo ^a   Usai, Alessandro ^a   Ravagnani, Roberto ^a  

^a BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Co ordination; Methodology; Network analysis; Projects; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986180719     PISSN: 02683946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02683949810214995     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arias, M.E. and Guillen, M. (1998), “The transfer of organizational techniques across borders: combining neo-institutional and comparative perspectives”, in Alvarez, J.L. (Ed.), The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge, Macmillan Press, London, pp. 110-37.
2. Boland, R.J. and Tenkasi, R.V. (1995), “Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing”, Organization Science, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 350-72.
3. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991), “Organizational learning and communities of practice. Toward a unified theory of working, learning and innovation”, Organization Science, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 40-57
4. Cummings, L.L. and Staw, B.M. (1984 (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.
5. Daft, R. and Lengel, R. (1984), “Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design”, in Cummings, L.L. and Staw, B.M. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 6, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 191-223.
6. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1988), The New-Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
7. Engwall, L. (1995), “Management research: a fragmented adhocracy?”, Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 11 No 3.
8. Engwall, L. (1998), “Mercury and Minerva: modern multinational academic business studies on a global scale”, in Alvarez, J.L. (Ed.), The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge, Macmillan Press, London, pp. 81-109.
9. Fleck, L. (1979), in Trenn, T.J. and Merton, R.K. (Eds), Genesis and Development of Scientific Facts, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
10. Furusten, S. and Kinch, N. (1992), “Swedish managerial thinking: a shadow of America”, in Lunden, R. and Asard, E. (Eds), Networks of Americanization - Aspects of the American Influence in Sweden, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala.
11. Galbraith, J.R. (1973), Designing Complex Organizations, Addison-Wesley.
12. Goodman, P.S. (1985), “Critical issues in doing research that contributes to theory and practice”, in Lawler, E., Cummings, L., Mormhan, T.G., Mormhan, A.M., Ledford, G.E. and Associates (Eds), Doing Desearch That Is Useful for Theory and Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 275-305.
13. Grandori, A. (1995), L’organizzazione delle attività economiche, Mulino, Bologna, IL.
14. Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. XIC.
15. Hassard, J. (1991), “Multiple paradigms and organizational analysis: a case study”, Organization Studies, Vol. 12, pp. 275-99.
16. Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1995), “Knowledge and the speed of transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test”, Organization Science, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 76-92.
17. Lammers, C.J. and Hickson, D.J. (1979), Organisations Alike and Unlike, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
18. Lawler, E., Cummings, L., Mormhan, T.G., Mormhan, A.M., Ledford, G.E. and Associates (1995 (Eds), Doing Research That Is Useful for Theory and Practice, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
19. Lawrence, P.R. and Lorsch, J.W. (1967), Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Cambridge University Press, UK.
20. Malone, T.W. and Crowston, K. (1993), “The interdisciplinary study of coordination”, CCS working paper, Vol. 157, November, pp. 3630-93.
21. Martin, J. (1991), “Deconstructing organizational taboos: the suppression of gender conflicts in organizations”, Organization Science, Vol. 1, pp. 339-59.
22. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 340-63.
23. Mintzberg, H. (1983), Structure in Five: Designing Effective Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
24. Nohria, N. and Eccles, G.B. (1998), “What does management knowledge come from?”, in Alvarez, J.L. (Ed.), The Diffusion and Consumption of Business Knowledge, Macmillan Press, London, pp. 278-304.
25. Nonaka, I. (1994), “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation”, in Organization Science, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 14-37.
26. Ramponi, F. (1996), “Comparing the continents: an overview of paradigmatic uncommensurability”, Doctoral Thesis, Università L. Bocconi, Milan, Italy
27. Reed, M. (1985), Redirections in Organizational Analysis, Tavistock, London.
28. Teagarden, M.B. et al. (1995), “Toward a theory of comparative management research: an idiographic case study of the best international human resources management projects”, in Academy of Managament Journal, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 1261-87.
29. Thompson, J.D. (1968), Organizations in Action, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
30. Wilmott, H. (1993), “Breaking the paradigm mentality”, Organization Studies, Vol. 14, pp. 681-721.