Views of building surveyors and building services engineers on priority setting of fire safety attributes for building maintenance

Facilities

Volumn 18, Issue , 2000, Pages 513-523

  Lo, S M ^a   Lam, K C ^a   Yuen, Richard K k ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Fire safety; Maintenance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986180550     PISSN: 02632772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02632770010328153     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Expert Choice (1998), Expert Choice Computer Software, Expert Choice, Pittsburgh, PA.
2. Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. (1993), Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Linstone, H.A. and Turoff, M. (Eds) (1975), The Dephi Method – Techniques and Applications, Addison-Welsey, Reading, MA.
4. Lo, S.M. (1999), “A fire safety assessment system for existing buildings”, Fire Technology, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 131-52.
5. Saaty, T.L. (1982), The Analytical Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
6. Schoemaker, P.J. and Waid, C.C. (1982), “An experimental comparison of different approaches to determining weights in additive utility models”, Management Science, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 182-96.
7. Shen, Q.P. and Lo, K.K. (1997), “A prioritisation method for planned maintenance works of public buildings in Hong Kong”, paper presented in Building Surveyors’ Conference 97, The Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors.
8. Watts, J.M. (1997), “Fire risk assessment using multiattribute evaluation”, Fire Safety Science: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium, pp. 679-90.