Rethinking the industrial relations tradition from a gender perspective: An invitation to integration

Employee Relations

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 190-210

  Hansen, Lise Lotte ^a  

^a ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Gender; Industrial relations; Integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986178235     PISSN: 01425455     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/01425450210420910     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Adams, R.J. (1988), “Desperately seeking industrial relations theory”, The International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 1-10.
2. Aunbirk, A. (1994), “Lønmodtagerorganisationernes forældrepolitik i 90’erne” (“The unions’ parents policy in the 1990s”), Social Kritik, Vol. 30.
3. Bain, G.S. and Clegg, H.A. (1974), “A strategy for industrial relations research in Great Britain”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 12, pp. 91-113.
4. Billing, Y.D. and Eriksen, K.E. (1995), Kvinder og mond i køn forening (Women and Men in a Gendered Union), PMF.
5. Bray, M. and Wailes, N. (1997), “Institutionalism and industrial relations” in Bramble et al. (Eds), Current Research in Industrial Relations: Proceedings of the 11th AIRAANZ Conference, AIRAANZ, Brisbane
6. Briskin, L. (1999), “Autonomy, diversity, and integration: union women's separate organization in North America and Western Europe in the context of restructuring and globalization”, Women's Studies International Forum, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 543-54.
7. Briskin, L. and McDermott, P. (Eds) (1993), Women Challenging Unions: Feminism, Democracy, and Militancy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
8. Cappelli, P. (1985), “Theory construction in IR and some implications for research”, Industrial Relations, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 90-112.
9. CASA (1999), Ta’ lige stilling. LO's reprosentationsundersøgelse (Take a Position on Gender Equality. The LO Report about Representation), Underbejdet til LO Kongres 99, LO.
10. Colgan, F. and Ledwith, S. (2000), “Diversity, identities and strategies of women trade union activists” Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 242-57.
11. Dahl, H.M. (2000a), “A perceptive and reflective state?”, The European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 7, pp. 475-94.
12. Dahl, H.M. (2000b), “Fra kitler til eget tøj – Diskurser om professionalisme, omsorg og køn” (“From white coat to own clothes – Discourses about professionalism, case and gender”), Politicas ph.d. serie, Institut for Statskundskab, Aarhus Universitet.
13. Dahlerup, P. (1991), Dekonstruktion. 90’ernes litteraturteori (Deconstruction. The Literary Theory of the 1990s), Gyldendal.
14. Dickens, L. (1997), Introduction: Some Limitations of Industrial Relations Research, IRRU Workshop: Industrial Relations, Equality and Exclusion, University of Warwick, Warwick.
15. Dickens, L. (1998), “What HRM means for gender equality”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 23-40.
16. Dunlop, J. (1958), Industrial Relations Systems, Holt & Co, New York, NY.
17. Dunn, S. (1990), “Root metaphor in the old and the new industrial relations”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 28, pp. 1-31.
18. Edwards, P. (Ed.) (1995), Industrial Relations. Theory and Practice in Britain, Blackwell, Oxford.
19. Ferner, A. and Hyman, R. (Eds) (1998), Changing Industrial Relations in Europe, Blackwell, Oxford.
20. FOA (2001a), “Lønforskelle fag kvinder og mænd” (“Differences in pay between women and men”), available at: www.foa.dk/siab.asp?o_id=8699&frame=dow
21. FOA (2001b), “Lønudvikling for mænd og kvinder” (“Development in pay for men and women”), available at: www.foa.dk/siab.asp?o_id=8553&frame=dow
22. Forrest, A. (1993), “A view from outside the whale: the treatment of women and unions in industrial relations” in Briskin and McDermott (Eds), Women Challenging Unions: Feminism, Democracy, and Militancy, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp. 325-41.
23. Green, A.-M. (forthcoming), “ Industrial relations and women”, in Ackers, P. and Wilkinson, A. (Eds), Reworking Industrial Relations: New Perspectives on Employment and Society.
24. Hill, S. and Thurley, K. (1974), “Sociology and industrial relations”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 12, pp. 147-70.
25. Hyman, R. (1975), Industrial Relations. A Marxist Introduction, Macmillan Press, Basingstoke.
26. Hyman, R. (1989), The Political Economy of Industrial Relations, Macmillan Press, Basingstoke.
27. Hyman, R. (1994), “Theory and industrial relations”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 165-80.
28. Hyman, R. (1997), “The future of employee representation”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 35, p. 3.
29. Jensen, C.S., Navrbjerg, S.E., Lubanski, N., Due, J. and Madsen, J.S. (1998), Tillidsrepræsentanten i tal. En spørgeskemaundersøgelse af tillidsrepræsentantens arbejdsvilkår og holdninger (The Shop Steward in Numbers. A Survey about the Shop Stewards’ Working Conditions and Attitudes), TR-undersøgelsen, LO.
30. Jensen, S.F. (1994), Samarbejdsaftalens historiske og politiske baggrund. Set i et kønsperspektiv (The Historical and Political Background of the Co-operation Agreement Between Employers and the Labour Movement. Analysed from a Gender Perspective), FIU-centret.
31. Kähler, M. (1992, Faste Forhold ønskes (Permanent Relationships Wanted), Sikon, Copenhagen.
32. Keenoy, T. (1991), “The roots of metaphor in the old and the new industrial relations”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 29, pp. 313-28.
33. Kelly, J. (1998), Rethinking Industrial Relations – Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves, Routledge, London.
34. Kristensen, C.J. (1997), “Gensidig integration – ansatser til en teoretisk tilgang til differentieret social integration” (“Mutual integration – ideas for a theoretical approach to differentiated social integration”) i Hegland et al. (Eds), Sammenbrud eller sammenhold? Nogle udviklingstendenser for velfærdssamfundet, Akademisk Forlag, pp. 29-37.
35. McBride, A. (2000), “Promoting representation of women within UNISON”, in Terry (Ed), Redefining Public Sector Unionism. UNISON and the Future of Trade Unions, Routledge, London, pp. 100-18.
36. McBride, A. (2001), Gender Democracy in Trade Unions, Ashgate, Aldershot.
37. Marsden, R. (1982), “Industrial relations: a critique of empiricism”, Sociology, Vol. 16, pp. 232-50.
38. Navrbjerg, S.E., Lubanski, N. and Jensen, C.S. (1998), “Tillidsrepræsentanten mellem arbejdsplads, fagforening og familie. Et kvalitativt studie af tillidsrepræsentanternes arbejdsvilkår” (“The shop steward between work, union and family. A qualitative study of the shop stewards’ working conditions”), TR-undersøgelsen 1998, LO.
39. Olsen, B.M. (1997), “Orlov til børnepasning – en familiepolitisk revolution?” (“Child care leave – a family political revolution?”), Kvinder, Køn og Forskning 6. Årg., No. 2, pp. 40-55.
40. Parker, J. (2000), “Women's equality in British unions: the roles and impacts of women's group organisation”, PhD thesis, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Warwick.
41. Phillips, A. (Ed.) (1998), Feminism & Politics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
42. Pocock, B. (2000), “Analysing work: arguments for closer link between the study of labour relations and gender”, Journal of Interdisciplinary Gender Studies, Special Issue, Gender and Workplace Relations, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 10-26.
43. Rubery, J. and Fagan, C. (1995), “Comparative industrial relations research: towards reversing the gender bias”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 209-36.
44. Salamon, M. (1987), Industrial Relations. Theory and Practice, Prentice-Hall International, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
45. Søndergaard, D.M. (1996), “Tegnet på kroppen. Køn: koder og konstruktioner blandt unge voksne i akademia” (“The sign at the body. Gender: codes and constructions among young grown-ups in academia”), Museum Tusculanums Forlag, Københavns Universitet.
46. Søndergaard, D.M. (1999), “Destabilising discourse analysis – approaches to poststructuralist empirical research”, Køn i den akademiske organisation, arbejdspapir no. 7.
47. Wajcman, J. (2000), “Feminism facing industrial relations in Britain”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 183-201.
48. Whitfield, K. and Strauss, G. (2000), “Methods matter: changes in industrial relations research and their implications”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 141-51.
49. Wood, S. (2000), “Editorial statement. The BJIR and industrial relations in the new millennium”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 1-5.
50. Young, I.M. (1995), “Gender as seriality: thinking about women as a social collective”, in Nicholson and Seidman (Eds), Social Postmodernism. Beyond Identity Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 187-215.