Implementing NAGPRA: the effective management of legislated change in museums

Management Decision

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 35-49

  Abraham, Morris ^a   Sullivan, Tim ^b   Griffin, Des ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Sovereign Hill Museums Association   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Leadership; Museums; Organizational change

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986173629     PISSN: 00251747     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00251740210413343     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ames, M.M. (2000), Are Changing Representations of First Peoples in Canadian Museums and Galleries Challenging the Curatorial Prerogative? The Changing Presentation of the American Indian, National Museum of the American Indian, Smithsonian Institution, in association with University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA, pp. 73-89.
2. Beckhard, R. and Harris, R.T. (1987), Organizational Transitions: Managing Complex Change, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
3. Bernstein, B. (1991), “Repatriation and collaboration: the museum of New Mexico”, Museum Anthropology, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 19-21.
4. Boyd, T.H. and Haas, J. (1993), The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: Prospects for New Partnerships between Museums and Native American Groups, American Association of Museums Technical Information Service’s Forum, Native American Collections and Repatriation, June, pp. 83-111.
5. Boyd, W.L. (1999), “Museums as centres of controversy”, Daedalus, Vol. 128 No. 3, pp. 185-229.
6. Bray, T.L. (1996), “Repatriation, power relations and the politics of the past”, Antiquity, Vol. 70 No. 268, pp. 440-4.
7. Burke, W.W. and Litwin, G.H. (1992), “A causal model of organization performance and change”, Journal of Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 523-45.
8. Duck, J.D. (1993), “Managing change: the art of balancing”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71 No. 6, pp. 109-18.
9. Dunphy, D. and Stace, D. (1990), Under New Management: Australian Organisations in Transition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
10. Echo-Hawk, W. (1996), Preface to Mending the Circle: A Native American Repatriation Guide, American Indian Ritual Object Repatriation Foundation, New York, NY, pp. 1-2.
11. Edwards, R. and Stewart, J. (1980), Preserving Indigenous Cultures: A New Role for Museums, UNESCO Regional Seminar 1978, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra. pp. 1-43.
12. Goldstein, L. and Kintigh, K. (1990), “Ethics and the reburial controversy”, American Antiquity, Vol. 55 No. 3, pp. 585-91.
13. Griffin, D.J.G. (1996), “Previous possessions, new obligations: a commitment by Australian museums”, Curator, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 45-62.
14. Griffin, D.J.G. (1998), “The return of indigenous cultural property”, Museum National, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 7-9.
15. Griffin, D.J.G., Abraham, M. and Crawford, J. (1999), “Effective management of museums in the 1990s”, Curator, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 37-53.
16. Haas, J. (1991), “Policy in practice”, Museum News, January/February, pp. 46-8.
17. Haas, J. (1996), “Power, objects, and a voice for anthropology”, Current Anthropology, Vol. 37, Supplement, pp. S1-S22.
18. Isaac, B. (1995), “An Epimethean view of the Peabody museum”, Federal Archaeology, Fall/Winter, pp. 20-2.
19. Kanter, R.M. (1992), “The challenges of execution: roles and tasks in the change process”, The Challenge of Organizational Change, Free Press, New York, NY, Ch. 10, pp. 369-94.
20. Killion, T. and Molloy, P. (1999), “Working together: repatriation’s silver lining”, Journal of the Society for American Archaeology, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 21-3.
21. Kotter, J.P. (1995), “Leading change: why transformational efforts fail”, Harvard Business Review, March-April.
22. Kurtzman, J. (1998), “The art of taking charge”, Heidrick and Struggles Leadership Journal, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1-12.
23. McKeown, C.T. (1997a), “The meaning of consultation”, Common Ground, Summer/Fall, pp. 16-19.
24. McKeown, C.T. (1997b), “The principles of consultation”, Common Ground, Summer/Fall, pp. 26-7.
25. McKeown, C.T. (1997c), “Good faith”, Common Ground, Summer/Fall, p. 46.
26. Mintzberg H. (1991), “The effective organization: forces and forms”, Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp. 54-67.
27. Morris, K.F. and Raben, C.S. (1995), “The fundamentals of change management”, in Nadler, D.A., Shaw, R.B., Walton, A.E. and Associates (Eds), Discontinuous Change: Leading Organizational Transformation, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 47-65.
28. Nadler, D.A. (1981), “Managing organizational change: an integrating perspective”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 17 No. 2.
29. Nadler, D.A. (1989), “Organizational frame bending: principles for managing reorientation”, The Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 3 No. 3, 194-204.
30. Nadler, D.A. (1998), Champions of Change: How CEO’s and Their Companies Are Mastering the Skills of Radical Change, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
31. Powell, S., Garza, C.G. and Hendricks, A. (1993), “Ethics and ownership of the past: the reburial and repatriation controversy”, Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 5, pp. 1-42.
32. Rose, J.C., Green, T.J. and Green, V.D. (1996), “NAGPRA is forever: osteology and the repatriation of skeletons”, Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 25, pp. 81-103.
33. Rosoff, N.B. (1998), “Integrating native views into museum procedures: hope and practice at the National Museum of the American Indian”, Museum Anthropology, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 33-42.
34. Ruppert, D. (1997), “New language for a new partnership”, Common Ground, Summer/Fall, pp. 37-8.
35. Sathe, V. (1985), Culture and Related Corporate Realities, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
36. Shown Harjo, S. (1995), “Introduction”, Mending the Circle: A Native American Repatriation Guide, American Indian Ritual Object Repatriation Foundation, New York, NY, pp. 3-7.
37. Stace, D. and Dunphy, D. (1994), Beyond the Boundaries: Leading and Recreating the Successful Enterprise, McGraw Hill Book Company, Maidenhead.
38. Thompson, R.H. (1991), “Dealing with the past, and looking to the future: now that repatriation is law, the focus of relations between Native Americans and museums is perhaps shifting to the issue of control over one’s heritage”, Museum News, January/February, pp. 37-40.
39. Trope, J. (1996), “The Native American Graves Protection Act”, Mending the Circle: A Native American Repatriation Guide, American Indian Ritual Object Repatriation Foundation, New York, NY, pp. 9-19.
40. Ulrich, D. and Lake, D. (1991), “Organizational capability: creating competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 5 No 1.
41. Vaill, P.B. (1993), “Visionary leadership”, in Cohen, A.R., The Portable MBA in Management, John Wiley, New York, NY, Ch. 2.
42. Waterman, R.H., Peters, T.J. and Phillips, J.R. (1980), “Structure is not organization”, Business Horizons, June, pp. 14-26.
43. Zaleznik, A. (1992), “Managers and leaders: are they different?”, Harvard Business Review, March-April, pp. 126-35.
44. Zimmerman, L.J. (1986), “Tell them about the suicide: a review of recent materials on the reburial of prehistoric North American skeletons”, Journal of American Indian Studies, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 333-43.
45. Zimmerman, L. (1992), “Archaeology, reburial, and the tactics of a discipline’s self-delusion”, American Indian Culture and Research Journal, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 37-56.
46. Zimmerman, L.J. (1996), “A new and different archaeology?”, American Indian Quarterly, Vol. 20 No. 2, Spring, pp. 297-307.
47. Zimmerman, L.J. (1997), “Anthropology and responses to the reburial issue”, in Biolsi, T. and Zimmerman, L. (Eds), Indians and Anthropologists: Vine Deloria Jr and the Critique of Anthropology, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, pp. 92-109.