Communication and antithesis in corporate annual reports: A research note

Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 594-608

  Davison, Jane ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communications; Company reports; Discipline; Narratives; Visual aids

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986172638     PISSN: 09513574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09513570210441431     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Barker, R. (2000), “FRS3 and analysts’ use of earnings”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 95-109.
2. Barthes, R. (1953, 1972), “La Rochefoucauld: ‘Réflexions ou Sentences et Maximes”, Le degré zéro de l’écriture, Le Seuil, Paris, pp. 69-88.
3. Barthes, R. (1970), “L'Antithèse I: le supplément”, S/Z, Le Seuil, Paris, pp. 33-5.
4. Bartlett, S.A. and Chandler, R.A. (1997), “The corporate report and the private shareholder: Lee and Tweedie twenty years on”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 29, pp. 245-61.
5. Dickens, C. (1859), A Tale of Two Cities.
6. Hopwood, A. (1996), “Making visible and the construction of visibilities: shifting agendas in the design of the corporate report: introduction”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 55-6.
7. Walters-York, L.M. (1996), “Metaphor in accounting discourse”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 45-70.
8. Barthes, R. (1982), “Rhétorique de l'image”, L'obvie et l'obtus, Le Seuil, Paris, pp. 25-42.
9. Barthes, R. (1985), “L'Ancienne Rhétorique”, L'aventure sémiologique, Le Seuil, Paris, pp. 85-165.
10. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1986), “Rational choice and the framing of decisions”, Journal of Business, Vol. 59 No. 4, pp. 251-78.