Is iconoclasm a virtue? Or the importance of stock editing

Library Review

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 54-57

  Alcock, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Academic libraries; Collection management; Library materials

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986170656     PISSN: 00242535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00242539610125686     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Follett, B., Joint Funding Councils’ Library Review Group: Report, Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristol, 1993.
2. Reed, L. and Erickson, R., “Weeding: a quantitative and qualitative approach”, Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, Vol. 17 No. 2, 1993, pp. 175-81.
3. Dolphin, P., “Student-driven route taken at Thames Valley”, Library Association Record, Vol. 96 No. 4, 1994, pp. 204-5.
4. Campbell, P.N., “Very little reading in libraries’ dusty tomes”, (letter), imes Higher Education Supplement, 17 December 1993.
5. Bond, R., “Subjective view of libraries”, (letter), imes Higher Education Supplement, 24 December 1993.
6. Arfield, J., “Pruning, weeding and grafting: strategies for the effective management of library stock”, Library Management, Vol. 14 No. 3, 1993, pp. 9-15.
7. Crawford, J., Thom, L.C. and Powles, J.A., “A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain”, Journal of Librarianship & Information Science, Vol. 25 No. 2, 1993, pp. 85-93.
8. Scottish Higher Education Funding Council, Reports of a Quality Assessment in Teacher Education, SHEFC, Edinburgh, 1995, p. 59.