Redeveloping brownfield land The decision-making process

Journal of Property Investment & Finance

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 481-500

  Syms, Paul ^a,b  

^a Paul Syms Associates   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contamination; Environment; Redevelopment; Risk assessment; Valuation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986165699     PISSN: 1463578X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14635789910294903     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Cadman, D. and Topping, R. (1995), Property Development, 4th ed., E. & F.N. Spon, London.
2. Denner, J. and Lowe, M.F. (1995), “UK contaminated land policy developments”, in van den Brink, W.J., Bosman, R. and Arendt, F. (Eds), Contaminated Soil ‘95, Proceedings of the 5th International FZK/TNO Conference on Contaminated Soil, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 75-83.
3. DoE (Department of the Environment) (1994), Framework for Contaminated Land, Outcome of the Government's Review and Conclusions from the consultation paper “Paying for our past”, Department of the Environment and the Welsh Office, London, November.
4. DoE (Department of the Environment) (1996a), Household Growth: Where Shall We Live?, HMSO, London.
5. DoE (Department of the Environment) (1996b), Consultation on Draft Statutory Guidance on Contaminated Land.
6. DETR (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions) (1998), press statement by John Prescott MP, Deputy Prime Minister.
7. Environment Act 1995, HMSO, London.
8. Fields, T. Jr. (1995), Definition statement in a paper by the Deputy Assistant Director, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, United States Environmental Protection Agency, presented at the Environmental Law Institute's workshop “Redeveloping Brownfields”, Washington DC, 28 March.
9. Grimski, D., Doetsch, P. and Rupke, A. (1998), Brownfields versus greenfield sites under economic and long term environmental considerations (contaminated land remediation as basis for the development of free spaces and assessment of development variants), in Contaminated Soil '98, Thomas Telford, London, pp. 651-60.
10. Kennedy, P.J. (1998), “Investment valuation of contaminated land and UK practice: a study with special reference to former gasworks”, unpublished PhD thesis, Nottingham Trent University.
11. Lizieri, C., Palmer, S., Finlay, L. and Charlton, M. (1995), Valuation Methodology and Environmental Legislation: A Research Project for the RICS Education Trust, City University Business School Discussion Paper Series, City University, London.
12. Mundy, B. (1992a), “Stigma and value”, The Appraisal Journal, January, pp. 7-13.
13. Mundy, B. (1992b), “The impact of hazardous materials on property value”, The Appraisal Journal, April, pp. 155-62.
14. Mundy, B. (1992c), “The impact of hazardous and toxic material on property value: revisited”, The Appraisal Journal, October, pp. 463-71.
15. Patchin, P.J. (1988), “Valuation of contaminated properties”, The Appraisal Journal, January, pp. 7-16.
16. Patchin, P.J. (1991a), “Contaminated properties – stigma revisited”, The Appraisal Journal, April, pp. 167-72
17. Patchin, P.J. (1991b), “The valuation of contaminated properties”, Real Estate Issues, Fall/Winter, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 50-4.
18. Patchin, P.J. (1994), “Contaminated properties and the sales comparison approach”, The Appraisal Journal, July, Vol. LXII No. 3, pp. 402-9.
19. Perowne, M. (1998), “Viewpoint”, Estates Gazette, Vol. 9820, 16 May, p. 34.
20. Planning Policy Guidance (1994), Planning and Pollution Control, (PPG 23), HMSO, London.
21. POST (Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology) (1998), A Brown and Pleasant Land: Household Growth and Brownfield Sites, POST, House of Commons, London.
22. Prescott, J. (1998), “The green belt is safe with us”, The Times, 26 January.
23. Richards, T.O. (1995), A Changing Landscape: The Valuation of Contaminated Land and Property, The College of Estate Management, Reading.
24. Richards, T.O. (1997), Is It Worth the Risk? The Impact of Environmental Risk on Property Investment Valuation, College of Estate Management Research Report, Reading.
25. Roberts, P., Joy, V. and Alker, S. (1998), “Towards a brownfield sites taxonomy: issues in the definition and classification of problems and potentials”, paper presented at the Remediation of Brownfield Sites for Housing Conference, Aston University, 28 October.
26. Syms, P.M. (1994), “The funding of developments on derelict and contaminated sites”, in Ball, R. and Pratt, A.C. (Eds), Industrial Property Policy and Economic Development, Routledge, London, pp. 63-82.
27. Syms, P.M. (1997a), Contaminated Land: The Practice and Economics of Redevelopment, Blackwell Science, Oxford, p. 289.
28. Syms, P.M. (1997b), The Redevelopment of Contaminated Land for Housing Use, a research report for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, ISVA, London.
29. Syms, P.M. (1998), Re-using Brownfield Sites: The Problem of Releasing Land for Development, Planning and Property Paper No. PP6, the Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research, Sheffield Hallam University, May.
30. Syms, P.M. (1999), “Brownfield land: whether or not to redeveloped – the decision making process” (revised), paper presented to the RICS “Cutting Edge” conference September 1998, de Montfort University, Leicester.
31. Wilson, A.R. (1994), “The environmental opinion: basis for an impaired value opinion”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. LXII No. 3, pp. 410-23.
32. Wilson, A.R. (1996), “Emerging approaches to impaired property valuation”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. LXIV No. 2, pp. 155-70.
33. Wiltshaw, D.G. (1996), “An economic analysis of contaminated land, remediation and liability”, Journal of Property Research, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 275-86.
34. Wiltshaw, D.G. (1998), “Stigma, perception and the remediation of contaminated land”, Journal of Property Research, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 285-303