Trust evaluation: an AHP and multi-objective programming approach

Management Decision

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 587-595

  Radcliffe, Larry L ^a   Schniederjans, Marc J ^b  

^a U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytical hierarchy process; Evaluation; Goals; Programming; Project management; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986135412     PISSN: 00251747     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00251740310484867     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Badri, M.A. (1999), “Combining the analytical hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 62 No. 2, pp. 237-248.
2. Bryson, N. (1996), “Group decision making and the analytic hierarchy process: exploring the consensus-relevant information content”, Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 23, pp. 27-35.
3. Decision Support Software (2002), Expert Choice, Decision Support Software, McLean, VA.
4. Duarte, D.L. and Tennant-Snyder, N. (1999), Mastering Virtual Teams: Strategies, Tools, and Techniques That Succeed, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
5. Glanz, J. (2001), “Particle physicists plan the next big thing”, New York Times, 10 July, p. 2B.
6. Hardt, P.O. and Brynteson, R. (1998), “Swift virtual trust”, Ibiz Magazine, December, available at: www.ibiz.net/dec98/table.htm.
7. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Shaw, T. (1998), “Global virtual teams: integrating models of trust”, Proceedings of the Volnet-Workshop, Institute of Information Systems, Department of Information Management, University of Bern, 27-28 April, available at: http://virtual-organization.net/news/workshop98_abstract.pdf.
8. Kim, P.O., Lee, K.J. and Lee, B.W. (1999), “Selection of an optimal nuclear fuel cycle scenario by goal programming and the analytical hierarchy process”, Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 26, pp. 449-460.
9. Kristof, A.L., Brown, K.G., Sims, H.P. Jr and Smith, K.A. (1995), “The virtual team: a case study and inductive model”, in Ed. Beyerlein, M.M., Ed. Johnson, D.A. and Ed. Beyerlein, S.T. (Eds), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams: Knowledge Work in Teams, Vol. 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 229-253.
10. Lee, S.M. (1996), AB:QM Systems Software, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
11. Meyerson, D., Weick, K.E. and Kramer, R.M. (1996), “Swift trust and temporary groups”, in Ed. Kramer, R.M. and Ed. Tyler, T.R. (Eds), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 166-195.
12. Render, B. and Stair, R.M. (2000), Quantitative Analysis for Management, 7th ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
13. Romero, C. (1991), Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
14. Saaty, T.L. and Vargas, L.G. (2001), Models, Methods, Concepts and Applications of the Analytical Hierarchy Process, Kluwer Academic Press, Norwall, MA.
15. Schniederjans, M.J. and Garvin, T. (1997), “Using the analytical hierarchy process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costing”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 100, pp. 72-80.