Stigma assessment: The case of a remediated contaminated site

Journal of Property Investment & Finance

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 188-212

  Bond, Sandy ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Contamination; Legal remedies; Modelling; Property management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986132954     PISSN: 1463578X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14635780110383721     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abelson, P.W. (1979), “Property prices and amenity values”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 6, pp. 11-28.
2. Bond, S.G. (1998), “The appraisal of contaminated land in New Zealand practice”, 14th American Real Estate Society Conference, in conjunction with the International Real Estate Society, 15-18 April, Monterey, CA.
3. Bond, S.G. and Kennedy, P.J. (2000), “The valuation of contaminated land: methods adopted in the United Kingdom and New Zealand”, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 254-71.
4. Bond, S.G., Kinnard, W.N., Worzala, E.M. and Kapplin, S.D. (1998), “Market participants’ reactions towards contaminated property In New Zealand and America”, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 251-72.
5. Chalmers, J.A. and Roehr, S. (1993), “Issues in the valuation of contaminated property”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 61 No. 1, pp. 28-41.
6. Colwell, P.F. (1990), “Power lines and land values”, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 117-27.
7. Dale, L., Murdoch, J.C., Thayer, M.A. and Waddell, P.A. (1999), “Do property values rebound from environmental stigmas? Evidence from Dallas”, Land Economics, Vol. 75 No. 2, May, pp. 311-26.
8. Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) (1996), letter to Dr John Rodgers to address his concerns regarding the different clean up criteria used for the SEW site and the Minim Cove development, December.
9. Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) (1997), amendments to the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (see Web page).
10. Dixon et al. (1988), Economic Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of Development Projects, Earthscan Publications in association with The Asian Development Bank, London.
11. Dixon, T.J. (1995), “Lessons from America: appraisal and lender liability issues in contaminated real estate”, research study sponsored by the Jones Lang Wootton Education Trust, College of Estate Management, Reading.
12. Dotzour, M. (1997), “Groundwater contamination and residential property values”, The Appraisal Journal, July, pp. 279-84.
13. Fraser, R. and Spencer, G. (1998), “The value of an ocean view: an example of hedonic property amenity valuation”, Journal of the Institute of Australian Geographers, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 94-8.
14. Freeman, A.M. III (1979), The Benefits of Environmental Improvement, John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.
15. Halpern, Glick, Maunsell Pty Ltd (1994), letter to Land Corp. re commitments met, October.
16. Halvorsen, R. and Palmquist, R. (1980), “The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations”, American Economic Review, Vol. 70 No. 3, pp. 474-5.
17. Jaconetty, T.A. (1996), “Stigma, phobias and fear: their effect on valuation”, Assessment Journal, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 51-67.
18. Kennedy, P.J. (1997), “Investment valuation of contaminated land and UK practice: a study with special reference to former gasworks”, unpublished PhD thesis, The Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham.
19. King, T.A. (1973), Property Taxes, Amenities and Residential Land Values, Balinger Publishing, Cambridge, MA.
20. Kinnard, W.N. Jr (1989), “Analyzing the stigma effect of proximity to hazardous materials sites”, Environmental Watch, Vol. II No. 4.
21. Kinnard, W.N. Jr (1990), “Measuring the effects of contamination on property values: the focus of the symposium in the context of current knowledge”, Technical Report, The Appraisal Institute, Chicago, IL.
22. Kinnard, W.N. Jr (1995), “The impact of widespread, long-term soil contamination on residential property values: a case study”, paper presented at the 1995 Annual Meeting American Real Estate Society Conference, Hilton Head, SC.
23. Kinnard, W.N. Jr and Dickey, S.A. (1995), “A primer on proximity impact research: residential property”, Real Estate Issues, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 23-9.
24. Kinnard, W.N. Jr and Worzala, E.W. (1998), “The valuation of contaminated properties and associated stigma: a comparative review of practice and thought in the US, the UK and New Zealand”, The Cutting Edge Conference, RICS, Leicester.
25. Laing, A. (1992), “International support for NZ initiative for changed world-wide guidelines for property assets”, Valuers’ Newsline, November, p. 4.
26. Lizieri, C., Palmer, S., Finlay, L. and Charlton, M. (1995), “Valuation methodology and environmental legislation: a research project for the RICS Education Trust”, City University Business School Discussion Paper Series, City University, London.
27. McLeod (1984), “The demand for local amenity: an hedonic price analysis”, Environment and Planning, Vol. A No. 16, pp. 389-400.
28. Mäler, K.G. and Wyzga, R.E. (1976), Economic Measurement of Environmental Damage: A Technical Handbook, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
29. Mundy, B. (1988), “Survey cites impacts of contaminants on value and marketability of real estate”, news release, American Society of Real Estate Counselors, Chicago, IL.
30. Mundy, B. (1989), “The impact of contaminants on real property marketability and value”, paper presented at the National Conference of American Society of Real Estate Counselors.
31. Mundy, B. (1992), “The impact of hazardous materials on property value”, The Appraisal Journal, April, pp. 155-62.
32. Patchin, P.J. (1991), “Contaminated properties – stigma revisited”, The Appraisal Journal.
33. Patchin, P.J. (1992), Valuing Contaminated Properties: Case Studies, Measuring the Effects of Hazardous Materials Contamination on Real Estate Values: Techniques and Applications, The Appraisal Institute, Chicago, IL.
34. Reichert, A.J. (1997), “Impact of a toxic waste superfund site on property values”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 65 No. 4, pp. 381-92.
35. Richards, T.O. (1995), “A changing landscape: the valuation of contaminated land and property”, College of Estate Management Research Report, Reading.
36. Richards, T.O. (1997), Is it Worth the Risk? The Impact of Environmental Risk on Property Investment Valuation, College of Estate Management Research Report, Reading.
37. Rosen, S. (1974), “Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, pp. 34-55.
38. Sanders, M.V. (1996), “Post-repair diminution in value from geotechnical problems”, The Appraisal Journal, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 59-66.
39. Simons, R.A. and Sementelli, A. (1997), “Liquidity loss and delayed transactions with leaking underground storage tanks”, The Appraisal Journal, July, pp. 255-60.
40. Slovic, P. (1992), “Perceptions of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm”, in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (Eds), Social Theories of Risk, Praeger, Westport, CT, pp. 117-52.
41. Syms, P.M. (1994), “The post-remediation values of contaminated land”, ISVA half-day seminar, ISVA, UK.
42. Syms, P.M. (1995), “Environmental impairment: an approach to valuation”, The Cutting Edge Conference, RICS, Leicester.
43. Syms, P.M. (1996), “The redevelopment and value of contaminated land”, unpublished PhD thesis, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield.
44. Syms, P. (1997), Contaminated Land: The Practice and Economics of Redevelopment, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
45. Thayer, M., Albers, H. and Rahmatian, M. (1992), “The benefits of reducing exposure to waste disposal sites: a hedonic housing value approach”, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 265-82.
46. Weber, B. (1998), “Stigma: quantifying Murphy’s law”, Urban Land, June.
47. Weber, B.R. (1996), “Stigma – unquantified risk?”, paper presented at the Cutting Edge Conference, Bristol.
48. Zeiss, C. and Atwater, J. (1989), “Waste facility impacts on residential property values”, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 115 No. 2, pp. 64-79.