Evaluating the health promoting school: A case study approach

Health Education

Volumn 100, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 200-206

  Inchley, Jo ^a   Currie, Candice ^a   Young, Ian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b NHS HEALTH SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diet; Evaluation; Health; Schools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986132035     PISSN: 09654283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09654280010343573     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Crosswaite, C., Currie, C. and Young, I. (1996), “The European Network of Health Promoting Schools: development and evaluation in Scotland”, Health Education Journal, Vol. 55, pp. 450-6.
2. Currie, C. et al. (1998), Health Behaviour in School-aged Children: Research Protocol for the 1997-98 Survey, RUHBC, Edinburgh.
3. Currie, C., Todd, J. and Thomson, C. (1997), HBSC Report 5: Comparisons of National Patterns in 1990 and 1994, RUHBC, Edinburgh.
4. Denman, S. (1999), “Health promoting schools in England a way forward in development”, Journal of Public Health Medicine, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 215-20.
5. Green, J. and Tones, K. (1999), “Towards a secure evidence base for health promotion”, Journal of Public Health Medicine, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 133-9.
6. Health Education Board for Scotland (2000), HEBS Research Strategy, HEBS, Edinburgh (in press).
7. Kolbe, L.J. (1986), “Increasing the impact of school health promotion programs: emerging research perspectives’, Health Education, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 47-52.
8. Macdonald, G. (1996), “Where next for evaluation?”, Health Promotion International, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 171-3.
9. Macdonald, G., Veen. C. and Tones, K. (1996), “Evidence for success in health promotion: suggestions for improvement”, Health Education Research, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 367-76.
10. National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) (1997), Parents’ Views of Health Education: Summary of Key Findings from the ENHPS Survey of Parents, Health Education Authority, London.
11. Nutbeam D. (1998) “Evaluating health promotion progress, problems and solutions’ Health Promotion International, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 27-44.
12. Nutbeam, D., Macaskill, P., Smith, C., Simpson, J. and Catford, J. (1993), “Evaluation of two school smoking education programmes under normal classroom conditions”, BMJ, Vol. 306, pp. 102-7.
13. Ovretveit, J. (1998), Evaluating Health Interventions, Open University Press, Buckingham.
14. Scottish Office (1996a), Eating for Health: A Diet Action Plan for Scotland, HMSO, Edinburgh.
15. Scottish Office (1996b), How Good is our School?, HMI, SOEID, Edinburgh.
16. Scottish Office (1999), Towards a Healthier Scotland, The Stationery Office, Edinburgh.
17. Springett, J. (1998), Practical Guidance on Evaluating Health Promotion, WHO, Copenhagen.
18. Todd, J., Currie, C. and Smith, R. (2000), HBSC Technical Report 3: Eating Patterns and Physical Activity in the 1990s, RUHBC/HEBS, Edinburgh (in press)
19. Tones, K. (1997), “Beyond the randomised controlled trial: a case for ‘judicial review”’, Health Education Research, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. i-iv.
20. Yin, R. (1989), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
21. Young, I. and Williams, T. (1989), The Healthy School, Scottish Health Education Group, Edinburgh.
22. WHO (1993), The European Network of Health Promoting Schools: A Joint WHO-CE-CEC Project, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
23. WHO (1997), Conference Resolution from the 1st Conference of the European Network of Health Promoting Schools, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.