Appraisal pitfalls and the training implications – Part 2

Industrial and Commercial Training

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 29-34

  Rees, W David ^a   Porter, Christine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Appeals; Performance appraisal; Problem analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986116818     PISSN: 00197858     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00197850410516094     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Giuliani, R. (2002), Leadership, Little Brown & Co., Boston, MA.
2. (The) Independent (2002), “Anger at £1,600 fee for teachers’ pay appeals”, 6 August.
3. Personnel Management (1993), “Merit pay scheme was discriminatory”, News Section, May.
4. Rees, W.D. and Porter, C. (2001), “‘Skills of management’, ‘Managers and their background’, ‘Appraisals’ and ‘Counselling’”, Skills of Management, Thomson Learning, London.
5. Rees, W.D. and Porter, C. (2002), “Management by panacea – the training implications”, Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 34 No. 6.