Innovation as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom?

European Journal of Innovation Management

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 20-31

  Johannessen, Jon Arild ^a   Olsen, Bj⊘rn ^b   Lumpkin, G T ^c  

^a BI NORWEGIAN BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Norway)

^b Bod Graduate School of Business   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Measurement; Norway

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986107434     PISSN: 14601060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14601060110365547     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Ames, B.C. and Hlavacek, J.D. (1988), Market Driven Management: Prescription for Survival in a Turbulent World, Irwin, Homewood, IL.
2. Ancona, D.G. and Caldwell, D.F. (1992), “Bridging the boundary: external process and performance in organization teams”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 634-65.
3. Antonelli, C. (1993), “The dynamics of technological inter-relatedness: the case of information and communication technologies”, in Foray, D. and Freeman, C. (Eds), Technology and the Wealth of Nations, Pinter, London.
4. Barney, J.B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 99-120.
5. Blau, P.M. and McKinley, W. (1979), “Ideas, complexity and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24, pp. 200-19.
6. Booz, Allen & Hamilton (1982), New Product Management for the 1980s, Booz, Allen & Hamilton, New York, NY.
7. Campbell, D.T. and Fiske, D.W. (1959), “Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 81-105.
8. Child, J. and Smith, C. (1987), “The context and process of organizational transformation”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 24, pp. 565-93.
9. Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. (1976), “The design and conduct of quasi-experiments and true experiments in field settings”, in Dunnette, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.
10. Cooper, R.G. (1993), Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
11. Covin, J.G. and Miles, M.P. (in press), “Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage”, Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice.
12. Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
13. Daft, R.L. and Becker, S.W. (1978), The Innovative Organization, Elsevier, New York, NY.
14. Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational innovation: a meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 555-90.
15. Damanpour, F. (1996), “Organizational complexity and innovation: developing and testing multiple contingency models”, Management Science, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 693-716.
16. Damanpour, F. and Evan, V.M. (1984), “Organizational innovation and performance: the problem of organizational lag”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29, pp. 392-409.
17. D’Aveni, R. (1994), Hypercompetition: The Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering, Basic Books, New York, NY.
18. Dewar, R.D. and Dutton, J.E. (1986), “The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: an empirical analysis”, Management Science, Vol. 32, pp. 1422-33.
19. Dosi, G. (1982), “Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change”, Research Policy, Vol. 11, pp. 147-62.
20. Dosi, G. (1988), “Sources, procedures, and micro-economic effects of innovation”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, pp. 1126-71.
21. Drazin, R. and Schoonhoven, C.B. (1996), “Community, population, and organization effects on innovation: a multilevel perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 1065-83.
22. Drucker, P.F. (1985), Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles, HarperBusiness, New York, NY.
23. Drucker, P.F. (1993), Post-Capitalist Society, Butterworth, Heinemann, NY.
24. Edquist, C. (1997), “Systems of innovation approaches – their emergence and characteristics”, in Edquist, C. (Ed.), Systems of Innovation, Pinter, London.
25. European Commission (1991), Four Motors for Europe: An Analysis of Cross-regional Cooperation, Fast Occasional Paper no. 241, CEC, DG XII, Vol. 17.
26. European Commission (1995), Green Paper on Innovation, Brussels.
27. Freeman, C.C. (1991), “Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues”, Research Policy, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 499-514.
28. Gartner, W.B. (1988), “‘Who is an entrepreneur?’ is the wrong question”, American Journal of Small Business, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 11-32.
29. Gersick, C.J.G. (1991), “Revolutionary change theories: a multi-level exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, pp. 10-36.
30. Granovetter, M. (1973), “The strength of weak ties”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, pp. 1360-80.
31. Hage, J. (1980), Theories of Organizations, Wiley, New York, NY.
32. Hage, J. and Dewar, R. (1973), “Elite values versus organizational structure in predicting innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18, pp. 279-90.
33. Håkanson, H. (1989), Corporate Technological Behavior: Corporation and Networks, Pinter, London.
34. Henderson, R. and Clark, K. (1990), “Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 9-30.
35. Jacobson, R. (1992), “The Austrian school of strategy”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 782-807.
36. Johannessen, J-A. and Hauan, A. (1994), “Communication: a system theoretical point of view”, Systems Practice, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 63-73.
37. Kanter, R.M. (1985), “Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 1, pp. 47-60.
38. Kim, J. and Mueller, C.W. (1978), Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
39. Kirzner, I.M. (1976), “On the method of Austrian economics”, in Dolan, E.G. (Ed.), The Foundation of Modern Austrian Economics, Sheed & Ward, Kansas City, MO, pp. 40-51.
40. Kirzner, I.M. (1985), Discovery and the Capitalist Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
41. Kotabe, M. and Swan, K.S. (1995), “The role of strategic alliances in high technology new product development”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16 No. 8, pp. 621-36.
42. Lawless, M.W. and Anderson, P.C. (1996), “Generational technological change: effects of innovation and local rivalry on performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 1185-217.
43. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992), “Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 111-25.
44. Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, G.G. (1996), “Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 135-72.
45. Lundvall, B.Å. (Ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation, Pinter, London
46. Lundvall, B.Å. and Johnson, B. (1994), “The learning economy”, Journal of Industry Studies, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 23-42.
47. McGrath, R.G., Tsai, M.H., Venkatraman, S. and MacMillan, I.C. (1996), “Innovation, competitive advantage and rent: a model and a test”, Management Science, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 389-403
48. Manu, F.A. and Sriram, V. (1996), “Innovation, marketing strategy, environment, and performance”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 35, pp. 79-81.
49. Midley, D.F., Morrison, P.D. and Roberts, J.H. (1992), “The effect of network structure in industrial diffusion processes”, Research Policy, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 533-52.
50. Miller, D. (1987), “Strategy making and structure: analysis and implications for performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 7-32.
51. Miller, D. (1990), The Icarus Paradox, HarperCollins, New York, NY.
52. Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H. (1978), “Archetypes of strategy formulation”, Management Science, Vol. 24 No. 9, pp. 921-33.
53. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
54. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
55. Nohria, N. and Gulati, R. (1996), “Is slack good or bad for innovation?”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 1245-64.
56. Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
57. Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
58. Pettigrew, A.M. (1985), The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
59. Quinn, J.B. (1992), Intelligent Enterprise, Free Press, New York, NY.
60. Quinn, J.B., Anderson, P. and Finkelstein, S. (1996), “Leveraging intellect”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 7-27.
61. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
62. Schumpeter, J.A. (1939), Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
63. Schumpeter, J.A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Harper & Brothers New York, NY.
64. Scott, S.G. and Bruce, R.A. (1994), “Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37, pp. 580-607.
65. Slappendel, C. (1996), “Perspectives on innovation in organizations’, Organization Studies, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 107-29.
66. STEP (1995), Innovation Performance at Industry Level in Norway: Information Technology Industry, working paper, W13, p. 95.
67. Stevenson, H.H. and Jarillo, J.C. (1990), “A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 17-27.
68. Teece, D.J. (1986), “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, in Teece, D.J. (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.
69. Teece, D.J. (1988), “The nature and the structure of firms”, in Dosi, G., Freeman, C, Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. (Eds), Technical Change and Economic Theory, Pinter, London.
70. Teece, D.J. (1989), “Inter-organizational requirements of the innovation process”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Special Issue, pp. 35-42.
71. Tushman, M.L. and Nadler, D. (1986), “Organizing for innovation”, California Management Review, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 74-92.
72. Tushman, M.L. and Romanelli, E. (1985), “Organizational evolution: a metamorphosis model of convergence and re-orientation”, in Staw, B. and Cummings, L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 171-122.
73. Utterback, J.M. and Abernathy, W.J. (1975), “A dynamic model of process and product innovation’, Omega, Vol. 3 No. 6, pp. 639-56.
74. Van de Ven, A.A. (1986), “Central problems in the management of innovation”, Management Science, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 590-607.
75. Van de Ven, A.A., Angle, H.L. and Poole, M.S. (Eds) (1989), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
76. Van de Ven, A.A. and Rogers, E.M. (1988), “Innovations and organizations: critical perspectives”, Communication Research, Vol. 15, pp. 623-51.
77. Van de Ven, A.A. and Poole, M.S. (1988), “Paradoxical requirements for a theory of organizational change”, in Quinn, R.E. and Cameron, K.S. (Eds), Paradoxes and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 19-63.
78. Vesper, K.H. (1988), “Entrepreneurial academics – how can we tell when the field is getting somewhere?”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 3, pp. 1-10.
79. Von Hippel, E. (1989), Sources of Innovation, Oxford, London.
80. Walton, R.E. (1987), Innovation to Compete, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
81. Young, J. (1994, “Innovate or die”, Forbes, February, Vol. 28, p. 106.
82. Zaltman, G., Duncan, R and Holbeck, J. (1973), Innovations and Organizations, Wiley, New York, NY.