A hedonic wage model-based methodology for evaluating the benefits of IT investments in public-sector organisations

Journal of Enterprise Information Management

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 269-275

  Cilek, Peter ^a   Janko, Wolfgang ^a   Koch, Stefan ^a   Mild, Andreas ^a   Taudes, Alfred ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Information systems; Investment appraisal; Public sector organizations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986105919     PISSN: 17410398     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17410390410548670     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bannister, F. and Remenyi, D. (2000), “Value perception in IT investment decisions”, The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, Vol. 3, available at: http://is.twi.tudelft.nl/ejise(accessed 26 May 2000).
2. Basili, V.R. and Rombach, H.D. (1988), “The TAME project: towards improvement-oriented software environments”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 14 No. 6, pp. 758-73.
3. Farbey, B. and Targett, D. (1994), “Matching an IT project with an appropriate method of evaluation: a research note on evaluating investments in IT”, Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 9, pp. 239-43.
4. Hares, J. and Royle, D. (1994), Measuring the Value of Information Technology, Wiley, Chichester.
5. Hauser, C. (1996), Marktorientierte Bewertung von Unternehmensprozessen, Verlag Josef Eul, Bergisch Gladbach.
6. Janko, W., Pönighaus, R. and Taudes, A. (1989), “Der nutzen von büroautomation – eine fallstudie”, Angewandte Informatik, No. 10, pp. 436-45.
7. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
8. Kock, N.F. Jr and McQueen, R.J. (1996), “Is re-engineering possible in the public sector? A Brazilian case study”, Business Change and Re-engineering, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 3-12.
9. Logan, C.H. et al. (1993), “Criminal justice performance measures for prisons”, in Ed. DiIulio, J.J. Jr, et al. (Ed), Performance Measures for the Criminal Justice System: Discussion Papers from the BJS-Princeton Project, NCJ-143505, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Princeton University, NJ.
10. Luck, J. and Peabody, J.W. (2000), “Improving the public sector: can re-engineering identify how to boost efficiency at a VA medical center?”, Health Care Management Review, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 34-44.
11. MacArthur, P.J., Crosslin, R.L. and Warren, J.R. (1994), “A strategy for evaluating alternative information system designs for business process re-engineering”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 237-51.
12. Maloof, M.A. (1999), “A machine learning researcher's foray into recidivism prediction”, Technical Report, CS-99-02, Department of Computer Science, Georgetown University.
13. Redlein, A. and Rohrhofer, R. (1995), “The use of CAD-systems – economic and organizational impact”, in Ed. von Barsani, K.R., Ed. MacConaill, P.A. and Ed. Thierney, K. (Eds), Opening Productive Partnerships, IOS Press, Amsterdam.
14. Remenyi, D., Money, A., Sherwood-Smith, M. and Irani, Z. (2000), The Effective Measurement and Management of IT Costs and Benefits, 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
15. Sassone, P.G. (1984), “Cost-benefit analysis for office information systems”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Office Automation, pp. 145-53.
16. Sassone, P.G. (1987), “Cost-benefit methodology for office systems”, ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 273-89.
17. Stickel, E. (1992), “Verfahren zur ermittlung der wirtschaftlichkeit von informationssystemen”, in Ed. Schweiggert, F. (Ed.), Wirtschaftlichkeit von Software-Entwicklung und-Einsatz, Teubner, Stuttgart, p. 47.
18. Taudes, A. and Lukanowicz, M. (1994), “Cost-benefit analysis of CAD Systems – a hedonic wage approach”, The 10th ISPE/IFAC International Conference on CAD/CAM, Robotics and Factories of the Future, CARs&FOF'94, 21-24 August 1994, Ottawa, Canada.