EFFECTS OF COMMUNICATION MEDIA ON INTELLECTIVE AND NEGOTIATION TASK PERFORMANCE

Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 1996

Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages 99-111

  Suh, Kil Soo ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION USE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

AUDIO VIDEOS; COMMUNICATION MEDIA; FACE TO FACE; INFORMATION REQUIREMENT; INTERACTION EFFECT; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; MEDIA RICHNESS THEORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS; TASK INFORMATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 84986105818     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Anderson, L. R., and Ager, J. W. “Analysis of Variance in Small Group Research.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Volume 4, Number 2, 1978, pp. 341-345.
2. Chapanis, A. “Interactive Human Communication.” In I. Grief, Editor, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings. San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1988.
3. Daft, R. L., and Lengel, R. H. “Information Richness: A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design.” Research in Organizational Behavior, Volume 6, 1984, pp. 191-233.
4. Daft, R. L., and Lengel, R. H. “Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design.” Management Science, Volume 32, Number 5, 1985, pp. 554-571.
5. Daft, R. L.; Lengel, R. H.; and Trevino, L. K. “Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems.” MIS Quarterly, Volume 11, Number 3, 1987, pp. 355-366.
6. Dennis, A. R., and Valacich, J. S. “Computer Brainstorms: More Heads Are Better Than One.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Volume 78, Number 4, 1993, pp. 531-537.
7. Douglas, A. “The Peaceful Settlement of Industrial and Intergroup Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Volume 1, 1957, pp. 69-81.
8. El-Shinnawy, M. M., and Markus, M. L. “Media Richness Theory and New Electronic Communication Media: A Study of Voice Mail and Electronic Mail.” In J. I. DeGross, J. D. Becker, and J. J. Elam, Editors, Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems. Dallas, Texas, 1992, pp. 91-105.
9. Fulk, J.; Steinfield, C. W.; Schmitz, J.; and Power, J. G. “A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations.” Communication Research, Volume 14, Number 5, 1987, pp. 529-551.
10. Gallupe, R. B.; Dennis, A. R.; Cooper, W. H.; Valacich, J. S.; Bastianutti, L. M.; and Nunamaker, J. F. “Electronic Brainstorming and Group Size.” Academy of Management Journal, Volume 35, Number 2, 1992, pp. 350-369.
11. Kinney, S. T., and Dennis, A. “Reevaluating Media Richness: Cues, Feedback, and Task.” Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume 4, 1994, pp. 21-30.
12. Kinney, S. T., and Watson, R. T. “The Effect of Medium and Task on Dyadic Communication.” In J. I. DeGross, J. D. Becker, and J. J. Elam, Editors, Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems. Dallas, Texas, 1992, pp. 107-117.
13. Markus, M. L. “Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice.” Organization Science, Volume 5, Number 4, 1994, pp. 502-527.
14. McGrath, J. E. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1984.
15. McGrath, J. E., and Hollingshead, A. B. “Putting the Group Back in Group Support Systems: Some Theoretical Issues About Dynamic Processes in Groups with Technological Enhancements.” In L. M. Jessup, and J. S. Valacich, Editors, Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. New York: Macmillan, 1993, pp. 78-96.
16. Morley, I. E., and Stephenson, G. M. “Formality in Experimental Negotiations: A Validation Study.” British Journal of Psychology, Volume 61, Number 3, 1970, pp. 383-384.
17. Morley, I. E., and Stephenson, G. M. “Interpersonal and Interparty Exchange: A Laboratory Simulation of an Industrial Negotiation at the Plant Level.” British Journal of Psychology, Volume 60, Number 4, 1969, pp. 543-545.
18. Morley, I. E., and Stephenson, G. M. The Social Psychology of Bargaining, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London, Great Britain, 1977.
19. Norusis, M. SPSS/PC+ Advanced Statistics Version 5.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc., 1992.
20. Rice, R. E. “Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness.” Organization Science, Volume 3, Number 4, 1992, pp. 475-500.
21. Sheffield, J. The Effects of Bargaining Orientation and Communication Medium on Negotiations in the Bilateral Monopoly Task. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, 1989.
22. Short, J. A. “Effects of Medium of Communication on Experimental Negotiation.” Human Relations, Volume 27, Number 3, 1974, pp. 225-234.
23. Trevino, L. K.; Lengel, R. H..;and Daft, R. L. “Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective.” Communication Research, Volume 14, 1987, pp. 553-574.
24. Valacich, J. S.; Dennis, A. R.; and Connolly, T. “Idea-generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Volume 57, Number 3, 1994, pp.448-467.
25. Valacich, J. S.; Mennecke, B. E.; Wachter, R. M.; and Wheeler, B. C. “Extensions to Media Richness Theory: A Test of the Task-Media Fit Hypothesis.” Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume 4, 1994, pp. 11-20.
26. Wheeler, B. C.; Valacich, J. S.; and Alavi, M. “The Emergence of Desktop Videoconferencing for Collaborative Work.” Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Volume 4, 1995, pp. 808-817.