Is there life after serials cancellation?

The Bottom Line

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 18-20

  Welch, Jeanie M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986104229     PISSN: 0888045X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/08880459610116247     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. For a discussion of the increased use of document delivery in academic libraries, see Association of Research Libraries, Uses of Document Delivery Services, Washington, DC, November 1994 (ARL SPEC Kit No. 204) and Jackson, M.E., “Interlibrary Loan, document delivery, and resource sharing”, Wilson Library Bulletin, Vol. 69 No. 9, May 1995, pp. 68-9, p. 113. For guidelines on document. delivery in interlibrary loan, see Reference and Adult Services Division, Management of Public Services Section, Interlibrary Loan Committee, “Guidelines and procedures for telefacsimile and electronic delivery of interlibrary loan requests and materials”, RQ, Vol. 24 No. 1, Fall, 1994, pp. 32-3. For a comparison of costs and response times for traditional interlibrary loan and selected commercial vendors, see Kurosman, K. and Durniak, B. A., “Document delivery: a comparison of commercial document suppliers and interlibrary loan services”, College & Research Libraries, Vol. 55 No. 2, March 1994, pp. 129-39.
2. Walter, P.L., “Doing the unthinkable: cancelling journals at a research library”, Serials Librarian, Vol. 18 No. 1-2, 1990, pp. 141-53.
3. Perkins, D.L., “Weed it and reap”, Serials Librarian, Vol. 18 No. 1-2, 1990, p. 135.
4. Ferguson, A., Price, M. and Duhon, L., “Document delivery: staffing, technology, and budgeting implications”, Serials Librarian, Vol. 25 No. 3-4, 1995, p. 323.