Mandatory retirement age and age discrimination

Employee Relations

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 151-166

  Sargeant, Malcolm ^a  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Age discrimination; Equality; Pensions; Retirement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986097689     PISSN: 01425455     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/01425450410511061     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cabinet Office (2000), Winning the Generation Game, Cabinet Office, London.
2. Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) (2002), Simplicity, Security and Choice: Working and Saving for Retirement, DWP, London.
3. DFEE (1998), Characteristics of Older Workers, Research Report RR45 RR45, DFEE, London.
4. Drury, E. (1993), “Age discrimination against older workers in the European Community”, Eurolink Age.
5. DTI (2001), Evaluation of the Code of Practice on Age Diversity in Employment Final Report, DTI, London.
6. DTI (2002), Implementing the Employment Directive: Mandatory Retirement Ages, DTI, London, June.
7. Duncan, C., Loretto, W. and White, P. (2000), “Ageism, early exit and British trades unions”, Industrial Relations Journal, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 2-20.
8. European Commission (1999), Towards a Europe for All Ages, COM(1999) 221, European Commission, Brussels.
9. Gaullier, X. (1988), La Deuxième Carrière, Seuill, Paris.
10. Grattan, P. (2002), Short Guide to Pensions and Work, Third Age Employment Network, London, October.
11. Gregory, R.F. (2001), Age Discrimination in the American Workplace, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
12. House of Commons Select Committee on Education and Employment (2001), Age Discrimination in Employment, Seventh Report, Session 2000-01, HC 259, House of Commons Select Committee on Education and Employment, London.
13. IDS Pensions Bulletin (2002), “Early retirement schemes still the norm in final salary schemes”, IDS Pensions Bulletin, No. 160, p. 4.
14. Nash v. Mash/Roe Group (1998), IRLR 168 ET.
15. National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education (NATFHE) (1995), Age Discrimination: A Discussion and Policy Document, NATFHE, London.
16. National Union of Teachers (n.d.), “Age diversity: information for NUT members”, available at: www.nut.org.uk.
17. Official Journal of the European Communities (2000), “Council Directive 2000/78/EC establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation”, OJ L 303/16 2.12.2000, 27 November.
18. Rutherford v. Towncircle Ltd (t/a Harvest) (in liquidation) and Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (No 2) (2002), IRLR 768 ET 768,.
19. Sargeant, M. (1999) Age Discrimination in Employment, Institute of Employment Rights, London.
20. Taylor, P.E. and Walker, A. (1994), “The ageing workforce: employers' attitudes towards older people”, Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 5-69.
21. UNIFI (2002), Response to the Government Consultation Document, “Towards Equality and Diversity”, UNIFI, London.
22. Venebles v. Hornby (2002), EWCA Civ 1277.
23. CIPD London (2001), Mature Job Seekers Need Not Apply, CIPD, London.