Corporate universities: A viewpoint on the challenges and best practices

Career Development International

Volumn 3, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 199-205

  Arnone, Maria ^a  

^a The Learning Partnership   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986097634     PISSN: 13620436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13620439810229415     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) (1996), Newsline, Spring.
2. Argyris, C. (1991), “Teaching smart people how to learn”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp. 99-109.
3. Beauchemin, A. (1997), NYNEX - personal communication and corporate newsletter.
4. Blieberg, M. (1997), Charles Schwab & Co. - personal communication.
5. Freedman, R.D. and Stumpf, S.A. (1982), “Management education: its theory, research and practice”, in Freedman, R., Cooper, C. and Stumpf, S. (Eds), Management Education: Issues in Theory Research and Practice, Wiley, New York, NY.
6. Fulmer, R. (1997), “An evolving paradigm of leadership development”, Organizational Dynamics, Spring.
7. Meister, J. (1994), Corporate Quality Universities, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
8. Molinaro, M. (1997), Deutsche Morgan Grenfell - personal communication.
9. Moore, T. (1997), “The corporate university: Transforming management education”, Accounting Horizons, pp. 77-85.
10. Peak, M. (1997), “Go corporate U”, Management Review, Vol. 86, February, pp. 33-7.
11. Rush, J. (1997), Bank of Montreal - personal communication.
12. Senge, P. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, New York, NY