Scheduling meetings using participants' preferences

Information Technology & People

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 140-151

  Pino, José A ^a   Mora, Hugo A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Employees; Groups; Meetings; Negotiating; Privacy; Scheduling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986052311     PISSN: 09593845     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09593849810218328     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Beard, D., Palanlappan, M., Humm, A., Banks, D., Nair, A. and Shan, Y. (1990 “A visual calendar for scheduling group meetings”, in Bikson, T.K. (Ed.), Proceedings of CSCW’90, Los Angeles, CA, ACM, New York, pp 279-90.
2. Egger, E. and Wagner, I. (1992), “Time-management: a case for CSCW”, in Turner, J. and Kraut, R. (Eds), Proceedings of CSCW’92, Toronto, Canada, pp. 249-56.
3. Ephrati, E., Zlotkin, G. and Rosenschein, J. (1994), “Meet your destiny: a non-manipulable meeting scheduler”, Proceedings of CSCW’94, Chapel Hill, NC, ACM, New York, October, pp. 359-71.
4. Flores, F., Graves, M., Hartfield, B. and Winograd, T. (1988), “Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction”, ACM Trans. on Office Information Systems, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 153-72.
5. Greif, I. and Sarin, S., (1987), “Data sharing in group work”, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 187-211.
6. Grudin, J., (1989), “Why CSCW applications fail: problems in design and evaluation”, Office: Technology and People, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 245-64.
7. Hudson, S. and Smith, I. (1994), “Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems”, in Ackerman, M.S. (Ed.), Proceedings of CSCW’94, Boston, MA, ACM, New York, pp. 248-57.
8. Kincaid, C., Dupont, P. and Kaye, A. (1985), “Electronic calendars in the office: an assessment of user needs and current technology”, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 89-102.
9. Mitchell, T., Caruana, R., Freitag, D., McDermott, J. and Zabowski, D. (1994), “Experience with a learning personal assistant”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37 No. 7, pp. 81-91.
10. Mosier, J. and Tammaro, S. (1997), “When are group scheduling tools useful?”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 53-70.
11. Orlikowski, W. (1992), “Learning from NOTES: organizational issues in groupware implementation”, in Turner, J. and Kraut, R. (Eds), Proceedings of CSCW’92, Toronto, Canada, New York, pp. 362-69.
12. Orlikowski, W. (1996), “Evolving with notes: organizational change around groupware technology”, in Ciborra, C.U. (Ed.), Groupware and Teamwork, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 23-59.
13. Robinson, M. (1991), “Computer supported co-operative work: cases and concepts”, in Hendricks, P.R.H. (Ed.), Proceedings of Groupware 91, Engineering Research Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 59-75.
14. Schmidt, K. and Bannon, L. (1992), “Taking CSCW seriously”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 1 No. 1-2, pp. 7-40.
15. Sen, S. and Durfee, E. (1991), “A formal study of distributed meeting scheduling: preliminary results”, Proceedings of the Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, ACM, New York, pp. 55-68.
16. Sugihara, K., Kikuno, T. and Yoshida, N. (1989), “A meeting scheduler for office automation”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 15 No. 10, pp. 1141-6.