Corporate real estate: Changing office occupier needs - a case study

Facilities

Volumn 16, Issue 9-10, 1998, Pages 262-270

  Dent, Peter ^a   White, Alan ^b  

^a OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986047381     PISSN: 02632772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02632779810229084     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. (The) Connaught Report (1997), Refurbishment in the Office Sector 1997/8, The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
2. Dias, H.R. (1997), “Overcrowded, under-utilised or just right?”, RICS Cutting Edge Research Conference, September, Dublin.
3. DTZ Debenham Thorpe Birmingham Metropolitan Area (1997), ULI Market Profiles.
4. Howland, M. and Lindsay, F.E. (1997), “Where do tenants come from? Using a geographic information system to study the demand for new office space”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 63 No. 3.
5. Hylton, R.D. (1994), “The revolution in real estate”, Fortune, Vol. 130 No. 5.
6. Kelly, H. (1997), “No threat from cyberspace”, Office Supplement, Property Week, November.
7. Miller, D. (1996), “Tech specs: atypical facilities cater to specialised industry needs”, The Business Journal, Vol. 4 No. 23.
8. Morley, S. (1996), The Future of Offices, EG Issue 9631, pp. 76-8.
9. Pittman, R. and McIntosh, W. (1992), “Determinants of tenant movements within office markets”, Journal of Property Management, Vol. 57 No. 6.
10. Richard Ellis (1997), Birmingham Market Bulletin Winter 1996/97, Research Consultancy, March.
11. Wadsworth, K.H. (1996), “Less opulence, more options: what commercial tenants really want”, Journal of Property Management, Vol. 61 No. 6.
12. White, J.R. (1993), “A perspective on future office building investment”, The Appraisal Journal, July.