Teams and performance appraisal:Using metrics to increase reliability and validity

Team Performance Management: An International Journal

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 238-244

  Valle, Matthew ^a   Davis, Kirk ^b  

^a WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TROY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Performance appraisal; Quantitative methods; Reliability; Team leaders; Teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986047352     PISSN: 13527592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13527599910304912     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bernardin, H.J. and Beatty, R.W. (1984), Performance Appraisal: Assessing Human Behavior at Work, Kent Publishing Company, Boston, MA
2. Cardy, R.L. and Dobbins, G.H. (1994), Performance Appraisal: Alternative Perspectives, South-Western, Cincinnati, OH
3. Church, A.H. and Bracken, D.W. (1997), “Advancing the state of the art of 360-degree feedback”, Group and Organizational Management, Vol. 22, pp. 149-66
4. Conway, J.M. and Huffcutt, A.I. (1996), “Testing assumptions of 360-degree feedback: a meta-analysis of supervisor, peer, subordinate, and self-ratings”, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA
5. Folger, R., Konovsky, M.A. and Cropanzano, R. (1992), “A due process metaphor for performance appraisal”, in Staw, B. and Cummings, L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 14, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 129-77
6. Harris, M.M. (1994), “Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: a theoretical framework”, Journal of Management, Vol. 20, pp. 737-56
7. Katzenbach, J.R. and Smith, D.K. (1993), The Wisdom of Teams, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
8. Kelley, H.H. (1973), “The process of causal attribution”, American Psychologist, February, pp. 107-28
9. London, M. and Smither, J.W. (1995), “Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 48, pp. 803-39
10. London, M. and Wohlers, A.J. (1991), “Agreement between subordinate and self-ratings in upward feedback”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 44, pp. 375-90
11. McGraw, K.O. and Wong, S.P. (1996), “Forming inferences about some intra-class correlation coefficients”, Psychological Methods, Vol. 1, pp. 30-46
12. Michaelsen, L.K. and Black, R.H. (1994), “Building learning teams: the key to harnessing the power of small groups in higher education”, Collaborative Learning: A Sourcebook for Higher Education, Vol. 2, National Center for Teaching, Learning and Assessment, State College, PA
13. Murphy, K.R. and Cleveland, J.N. (1995), Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-based Perspectives, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
14. National Archives and Records Administration (1978), “Uniform guidelines on employee selection procedures”, Federal Register, Vol. 43, pp. 38290-315
15. Schrader, B.W. and Steiner, D.D. (1996), “Common comparison standards: an approach to improving agreement between self and supervisory performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81, pp. 813-20
16. Scullen, S.E., Mount, M.K. and Systma, M.R. (1996), Comparisons of Self, Peer, Direct Report and Boss Ratings of Managers’ Performance, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA
17. Shavelson, R.J. and Webb, N.M. (1991), Generalizability Theory: A Primer, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA
18. Shrout, P.E. and Fleiss, J.L. (1979), “Intra-class correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 86, pp. 420-8
19. Tsui, A.S. and Ohlott, P. (1988), “Multiple assessment of managerial effectiveness: Interrater agreement and consensus in effectiveness models”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 41, pp. 779-803
20. Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D.S. and Schmidt, F.L. (1996), “Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81, pp. 557-74
21. Werner, J.M. and Bolino, M.C. (1997), “Explaining US courts of appeals decisions involving performance appraisal: accuracy, fairness, and validation”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 1-24
22. Woehr, D.J. and Huffcutt, A.I. (1994), “Rater training for performance appraisal: a quantitative review”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 67, pp. 189-205
23. Zammuto, R., London, M. and Rowland, K. (1982), “Organizational and rater differences in performance appraisals”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 35, pp. 643-58