Quality assurance in subject gateways: Creating high quality portals on the Internet

Quality Assurance in Education

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 38-48

  Belcher, Martin ^a   Place, Emma ^a   Conole, Grainne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Information management; Internet; Models; Quality assurance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986042697     PISSN: 09684883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09684880010312686     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Alexander, J. and Tate, M.A. (1999), Evaluating Web Resources, http://www2.widener.edu/ Wolfgram-Memorial-Library/webeval.htm
2. Armstrong, C. (1997), Metadata, PICS and Quality, Ariadne, Issue 9, http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue9/pics/
3. Auer, N. (1999), Bibliography on Evaluating Internet Resources, http://www.lib.vt.edu/research/libinst/evalbiblio.html
4. Brickley, D., Gardner, T., Heery, R. and Hiom, D. (1999), Recommendations on Implementation of Quality Ratings in an RDF Environment, October, http://www.desire.org/html/research/deliverables/D3.2/
5. DESIRE (1999a), DESIRE Information Gateways Handbook, October, http://www.desire.org/html/subjectgateways/handbook/
6. DESIRE (1999b), Development of a European Service for Information on Research and Education, October, http://www.desire.org/
7. Hofman, P. and Worsfold, E. (1999), Selection Criteria for Quality Controlled Information Gateways, October, http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/desire/quality/
8. IMESH (1999), International Collaboration on Internet Subject Gateways, October, http://www.desire.org/html/subjectgateways/community/imesh/#reading
9. Koch, T. (1999), “Criteria for quality controlled subject services”, http://www.lub.lu.se/tk/ SBIG-definition.txt
10. PICS (1999), Platform for Internet Content Selection, October, http://www.w3.org/PICS/
11. RDF (1999), Resource Description Framework, October, http://www.w3.org/RDF/