The development of Richard Bates's critical theory in educational administration

Journal of Educational Administration

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 367-388

  Hyung Park, Sun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Education; Management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986042620     PISSN: 09578234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09578239910285598     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Antonio, R.J. (1989), “The normative foundations of emancipatory theory: evolutionary versus pragmatic perspectives”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94 No. 4, pp. 721-48.
2. Bates, R.J. (1980a), “Educational administration, the sociology of science, and the management of knowledge”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 1-20.
3. Bates, R.J. (1980b), “New developments in the new sociology of education”, British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 67-79.
4. Bates, R.J. (1980c), “Bureaucracy, professionalism and knowledge: structures of authority and control”, Educational Research and Perspectives, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 66-76.
5. Bates, R.J. (1981), “What can the new sociology of education do for teachers?”, Discourse, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 41-53.
6. Bates, R.J. (1982), “Towards a critical practice of educational administration”, Studies in Educational Administration, Vol. 27, pp. 1-15.
7. Bates, R.J. (1983), Educational Administration and the Management of Knowledge, Deakin University Press, Geelong.
8. Bates, R.J. (1984), “Education, community and the crisis of the state”, Discourse, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 59-81.
9. Bates, R.J. (1985a), “A Marxist theory of educational administration?”, paper presented to the symposium on Critical Theory, Marxism and Educational Administration, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
10. Bates, R.J. (1985b), Public Administration and the Crisis of the State, Deakin University Press, Geelong.
11. Bates, R.J. (1988a), Evaluating Schools: A Critical Approach, Deakin University Press, Geelong.
12. Bates, R.J. (1988b), “Is there a new paradigm in educational administration?”, paper presented to the Organisational Theory Special Interest Group Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
13. Bates, R.J. (1992), “On knowing: cultural and critical approaches to educational administration”, paper presented to the Regional Conference of the Commonwealth Council of Educational Administration held at the University of Hong Kong.
14. Bates, R.J. (1993), “On knowing: cultural and critical approaches to educational administration”, Educational Management and Administration, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 171-6.
15. Bates, R.J. (1994), “The bird that sets itself on fire: Thom Greenfield and the renewal of educational administration”, paper presented to the 8th International Intervisitation Program Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada.
16. Bates, R.J. (1995), “Critical theory of educational administration”, in Evers, C.W. and Chapman, J. (Eds), Educational Administration: An Australian Perspective, Allen and Unwin, Sydney, pp. 49-59.
17. Bernstein, R.J. (1985) (Ed.), Habermas and Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.
18. Boyd, R., Gasper, P. and Trout, J.D. (Eds) (1991), The Philosophy of Science, MIT Press, MA.
19. Brown, R.H. (1978), “Bureaucracy as praxis: toward a political phenomenology of formal organizations”, Administration Science Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 365-82.
20. Evers, C.W. (1994), “On theory in educational administration: beyond Greenfield's subjectivism”, paper presented to the 8th International Intervisitation Program, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada.
21. Evers, C.W. and Lakomski, G. (1991), Knowing Educational Administration: Contemporary Methodological Controversies in Educational Research, Pergamon, Oxford.
22. Evers, C.W. and Lakomski, G. (1993), “Responses to commentaries”, Educational Management and Administration, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 185-7.
23. Foster, W. (1980a), “Administration and the crisis in legitimacy: a review of Habermasian thought”, Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 496-505.
24. Foster, W. (1980b), “The changing administrator: developing managerial praxis”, Education Theory, Vol. 30 No. 1, pp. 11-23.
25. Foster, W. (1986), Paradigms and Promises, Prometheus Books, New York, NY.
26. Grayling, A.C. (1994), “Transcendental arguments”, in Dancy, J. and Sosa, E. (Eds), A Companion to Epistemology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 506-9.
27. Greenfield, T.B. (1975), “Theory about organization: a new perspective and its implication for schools”, in Hughes, M. (Ed.), Administering Education: International Challenges, Athlone, London, pp. 71-99.
28. Greenfield, T.B. (1991), “Science and service: the making of one profession of educational administration”, paper presented to the Thirty-Fifth Anniversary Conference of the Department of Educational Administration, University of Alberta, Edmonton.
29. Greenfield, T.B. and Ribbins, P. (Eds) (1993), Greenfield on Educational Administration: Towards a Humane Science, Routledge, London.
30. Griffiths, D.E. (1983), “Can there be a science of organization?”, paper presented to the UCEA Seminar held at Rutgers University. Reprinted in Johnston, G.S. and Yeakey, C.C. (Eds) (1986), Research and Thought in Administrative Theory: Developments in the Field of Educational Administration, University Press of America, Lanham, MA, pp. 133-43.
31. Griffiths, D.E. (1995), “Book reviews of Greenfield on educational administration: towards a humane science”, in Greenfield, T. and Ribbins, P. (Eds), by Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 31 No. 1, Routledge, London, pp. 151-8.
32. Gronn, P.C. (1983a), Rethinking Educational Administration: T.B. Greenfield and His Critics, Deakin University Press, Geelong.
33. Gronn, P.C. (1983b), “Talk as the work: the accomplishment of school administration”, Administration Science Quarterly, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 1-21.
34. Habermas, J. (1970), “Towards a theory of communicative competence”, Inquiry, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 360-76.
35. Habermas, J. (1972), Knowledge and Human Interests, translated by J.J. Shapiro, Heinemann, London.
36. Habermas, J. (1976), Legitimation Crisis, translated by T. McCarthy, Heinemann, London.
37. Habermas, J. (1979), Communication and the Evolution of Society, translated by T. McCarthy, Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
38. Habermas, J. (1982), “A reply to my critics”, in Thompson, J.B. and Held, D. (Eds), Habermas: Critical Debates, Macmillan, London, pp. 219-83.
39. Habermas, J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, translated by T. McCarthy, Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
40. Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action Vol 2: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, translated by T. McCarthy, Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
41. Lakomski, G. (1987), “Critical theory and educational administration”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 85-100.
42. Lane, T.J. (1983), “How critical is critical theory”, Studies in Educational Administration, Vol. 32, pp. 5-11.
43. Mackenzie, J. (1996), personal communication, May.
44. Maddock, T.H. (1995), “Science, critique and administration: the debate between the critical theorists and the materialist pragmatists”, Educational Management and Administration, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 58-67.
45. Marx, K. (1970), A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Progress Publishers, Moscow.
46. McCarthy, T. (1984), The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, Polity Press, Cambridge.
47. Park, S.H. (1995), “Understanding Australian naturalism in educational administration”, Educational Administration and Foundations, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 39-59.
48. Park, S.H. (1996), “An evaluation of T.B. Greenfield's subjectivism in educational administration”, Leading and Managing, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 284-303.
49. Park, S.H. (1997), “Australian naturalism and its critics”, Educational Management and Administration, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 395-416.
50. Pusey, M. (1983), “Senior public servants and the crisis of the late capitalist state”, paper presented to the Department of Political Science, Australian National University, Canberra. Reprinted in Bates, R. (Ed.) (1985), Public Administration in the Crisis of the State, Deakin University, Geelong, pp. 71-89.
51. Pusey, M. (1987), Jürgen Habermas, Ellis Horwood and Tavistock, London.
52. Quine, W.V. (1966), The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Random House, New York, NY.
53. Roderick, R. (1986), Habermas and the Foundations of Critical Theory, Macmillan, London.
54. Sarup, M. (1978), Marxism and Education, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
55. Scheurich, J.J. and Imber, M. (1991), “Educational reforms can reproduce societal inequities: a case study”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 297-320.
56. Shalin, D.N. (1992), “Critical theory and the pragmatist challenge”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 98 No. 2, pp. 237-79.
57. Waktins, P.E. (1983), “Scientific management and critical theory in educational administration”, paper presented to the Institute for Educational Administration, Geelong. Reprinted in Bates, R., Educational Administration and the Management of Knowledge, Deakin University, Geelong, pp. 119-35.
58. Weber, M. (1976), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Allen and Unwin, London.
59. Whitty, G. (1985), Sociology and School Knowledge, Methuen, London.
60. Willower, D.J. (1980), “Contemporary issues in theory in educational administration”, Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 1-25.
61. Willower, D.J. (1981), “Educational administration: some philosophical and other considerations”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 115-39.
62. Young, M.F.D. (Ed.) (1971), Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education, Macmillan, London.
63. Young, R.E. (1990), A Critical Theory of Education: Habermas and Our Children's Future, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.
64. Young, R.E. (1992), Critical Theory and Classroom Talk, Multilingual Matters, Adelaide.
65. Young, R.E. (1993), “Critical or reductionist naturalism: an alternative choice”, Discourse, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 100-1.
66. Young, R.E. (1996), Intercultural Communication: Pragmatics, Genealogy, Deconstruction, Multilingual Matters, Adelaide.