Why educators have problems with some students:Understanding frames of preference

Journal of Educational Administration

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 243-256

  Gilbert, Michael B ^a  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communications; Learning styles; Students

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986037657     PISSN: 09578234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09578239910275481     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barbe, W.B. and Swassing, R.H. (1979), Teaching through Modality Strengths, Zaner-Bloser, Columbus, OH.
2. Coty, S. (1994), “‘Sometimes I wish I'd never did it”. Removing communication road blocks from at-risk students”, Voices in the Middles, Vol 1 No 2, pp. 19-25.
3. Gilbert, M.B. (1992), “Dreamers, rebels, and others: personality styles affect communication”, Executive Educator, Vol 14 No 6, pp. 32-3.
4. Gilbert, M.B. (1994), “Meeting communication needs of students can promote success”, unpublished off-campus duty assignment report, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AZ.
5. Gilbert, M.B. (1996), “The process communication model: understanding ourselves and others”, NASSP Bulletin, Vol 80 No 578, pp. 75-80.
6. Gregorc, A. (1982), Gregorc Style Delineator, Gabriel Systems, Inc., Maynard, MA.
7. Hawking, N.G. (1995), “A study of the impact on student achievement by teachers trained in process communication”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR.
8. Johnson, D.W. (1972), Reaching Out: Interpersonal Effectiveness and Self-actualization, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
9. Kahler Communications, Inc. (n. d.), Personality Pattern Inventory Validation Procedures, Kahler Communications, Inc., Little Rock, AZ.
10. Kahler, T. (1982), Process Communication Model: A Contemporary Model for Organizational Development, Kahler Communications, Inc., Little Rock, AZ.
11. Kahler, T. (1988), The Mastery of Management: Or How to Solve the Mystery of Mismanagement, Kahler Communications, Inc., Little Rock, AR.
12. Knaupp, J. (n.d.), “Preservice teachers’ ranking of personality characteristics preferred by primary students, middle school students, parents and administrators”, unpublished paper, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
13. Kolb, D.A. (1984), Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
14. McCarthy, B. (1980), The 4MAT System: Teaching to Learning Styles with Right/Left Mode Techniques, Excel, Inc., Barrington, IL.
15. Murray (1938), Explorations in Personality.
16. Myers, I.B. and Briggs, K.C. (1943), 1976, 1985), Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
17. Noland, J.R. (1978), Personalysis, Communication Development, Inc., St. Paul, MN.
18. O'Sullivan, R.G., Puryear, P. and Oliver, D. (1994), “Evaluating the use of learning styles instruction to promote academic success among at-risk 9th graders”, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, New Orleans, LA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED377195).
19. Pierce, C. (1994), “Importance of classroom climate for at-risk learners”, Journal of Educational Research, Vol 88 No 1, pp. 37-42.
20. Pope C. and Beal, C. (1994), “Building pathways for at-risk students and their teachers”, Voices in the Middles, Vol 1 No 2, pp. 3-10.
21. Wallin, M. (1992), “Making” the Grade: The Effects of Teacher Personality Types on Student Grading Practices, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
22. Wilmore, E.L. (1995), Communication Skills: Success Is All a Matter of How You Say Things (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED392123).