Anti-Jka that are detected by solid-phase red blood cell adherence but missed by gel testing can cause hemolytic transfusion reactions

Transfusion

Volumn 56, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 2973-2979

  Kay, Brian ^a   Poisson, Jessica L ^a   Tuma, Christopher W ^a   Shulman, Ira A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEMOLYTIC TRANSFUSION REACTION; ANTIBODY SCREENING; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY REACTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD BANK; BLOOD DONOR; BLOOD GROUP KIDD SYSTEM; BLOOD TRANSFUSION REACTION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COOMBS TEST; DELAYED HEMOLYTIC TRANSFUSION REACTION; DELAYED SEROLOGIC REACTION; ERYTHROCYTE ADHESIVENESS; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; GEL SCREEN; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; SEROLOGY; SOLID PHASE RED BLOOD CELL ADHERENCE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; BLOOD; BLOOD EXAMINATION; BLOOD GROUP INCOMPATIBILITY; BLOOD GROUP TYPING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; HEMOLYSIS; IMMUNOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; TRANSFUSION REACTION;

ANTIBODY; BLOOD GROUP KIDD SYSTEM;

ANTIBODIES; BLOOD GROUP INCOMPATIBILITY; BLOOD GROUPING AND CROSSMATCHING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; HEMATOLOGIC TESTS; HEMOLYSIS; HUMANS; KIDD BLOOD-GROUP SYSTEM; TRANSFUSION REACTION;

EID: 84985898040     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/trf.13782     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sands JM. Molecular mechanisms of urea transport. J Membr Biol 2003;191:149–63.
2. Reverberi R. The persistence of red cell alloantibodies. Blood Transfus 2008;6:225–34. Oct;
3. Heddle NM, Soutar RL, O'Hoski PL. A prospective study to determine the frequency and clinical significance of alloimmunization post-transfusion. Br J Haematol 1995;91:1000–5. Dec;
4. a detection on screening cell zygosity. Lab Med 1985;l6:602–4.
5. a, anti-S and anti-Jka in relation to the genotypes of the panel red cells: report of a U.K. NEQAS survey. U.K. National External Quality Assessment Scheme. Transfus Med 1993;3:123–7.
6. a sera reacting by antiglobulin technique. Vox Sang 1983;45:129–38.
7. Howard JE, Winn LC, Gottlieb CE, et al. Clinical significance of the anti-complement component of antiglobulin antisera. Transfusion 1982;22:269–72.
8. Harmening D. Modern blood banking and transfusion practices. Philadelphia (PA): F. A. Davis; 2012.
9. Weisbach V, Kohnhauser T. Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies. Transfus Med 2006;16:276–84.
10. The significance of the difference between two independent proportions [Internet]. ©Richard Lowry; 2001- 2006 [cited 2016 Jan 24]. Available from: http://vassarstats.net/propdiff_ind.html.
11. Bolton-Maggs PH, Cohen H. Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) haemovigilance and progress is improving transfusion safety. Br J Haematol 2013;163:303–14.
12. Downes KA, Shulman IA. Pretransfusion testing practices in North America, 2005-2010: an analysis of the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program J-survey data, 2005-2010. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012;136:294–300.
13. Kim MY, Chaudhary P, Shulman IA. Major non-ABO incompatibility caused by anti-Jk(a) in a patient before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Immunohematology 2013;29:11–4.
14. Van Winden K, Poisson J, Shulman IA. Non-specific red-cell reactivity in an obstetric population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;23:1–4.
15. Enko D, Habres C. Frequencies and specificities of “enzyme only” detected erythrocyte antibodies in patients hospitalized in Austria: is an enzyme test required for routine red blood cell antibody screening? J Blood Transfus 2014;2014:532919.