Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1985, Pages 263-280

  Nederhof, Anton J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84985846044     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420150303     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Plumbing the depths of the bogus pipeline: A reprise
2. A self‐presentational view of social phenomena
3. Evaluation apprehension and subject bias in experiments
4. Estimation of proportions using symmetric randomized response designs
5. Question threat and response bias
6. Attitude measurement via the bogus pipeline: A dry well?
7. Validation of self‐report measures using ratings by others
8. Personality characteristics and social achievement behaviors associated with children's social desirability response tendencies
9. Further evidence on response set and test design
10. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology
11. Bedürfnis nach sozialer anerkennung: validierung der Marlowe‐Crowne Social Desirability Scale über ein konzept individuell relevanter gruppen
12. Interviewer biasing effects: towards a reconciliation of findings
13. Social distance and interviewer effects
14. Validity of responses in a randomized response model
15. The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed
16. Social desirability and the factorial interpretation of the MMPI
17. Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models
18. Interview rapport: demise of a concept
19. Response bias in surveys of mental health: an empirical investigation
20. A short social desirability scale
21. Self‐deception: A concept in search of a phenomenon
22. Social desirability and the randomized response technique
23. The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude
24. Methods of peer assessment
25. Influence of social desirability on symptom and mood reporting in a community survey
26. Pretest Sensitization
27. Approval seeking, social cost, and agression: a scale and some dynamics
28. An investigation of interview methods, threat, and response distortion
29. Individual differences in status generalization: Effects of need for social approval, anticipated interpersonal contact, and instrumental task abilities
30. The quality of proxy information. Some results from a large‐scale study
31. Consensual validation of personality traits: Evidence from self‐reports and ratings
32. Social desirability scales: More substance than style
33. Suspiciousness of experimenter's intent
34. The K‐factor as a suppressor variable in the MMPI
35. Response sets’. In:
36. Complexities of the randomized response solution
37. Two components of need of approval score and their relationship to cheating following success and failure
38. Need for social approval: Impression management of self‐deception?
39. The need for social approval
40. The effects of material incentives in mail surveys: Two studies
41. Visibility of response as mediating factor in equity research
42. The “crisis” in social psychology, an empirical approach
43. Communication by the total experimental situation
44. The bogus pipeline: A new ignis fatuus?
45. Statistical control of socially desirable responding in personality inventories: Principal‐factor deletion
46. Individual differences, impression management, and cognitive dissonance: Their concurrent operation in forced compliance
47. Two‐component models of socially desirable responding
48. Response biases in field studies of mental illness
49. Some effects of “social desirability” in survey studies
50. The bogus pipeline as lie detector: Two validity studies
51. On the two‐dimensional nature of the Marlowe‐Crowne social desirability scale
52. The bogus pipeline and attitude moderation following induced compliance: Misattribution of dissonance arousal or impression management inhibition?
53. Interviews by telephone and in person: quality of responses and field performance
54. The great response‐style myth
55. The conditions and consequences of evaluation apprehension
56. Mediation of artifacts in behavioral research
57. Self‐deception, self‐confrontation, and consciousness
58. Self‐deception, other‐deception, and self‐reported psychopathology
59. Measuring responding desirability with attitude‐opinion items
60. Social desirability and individual conceptions of the desirable
61. Attitude measurement
62. Social desirability and need approval: some paradoxial data and a conceptual re‐evaluation
63. Current stereotypes: A little fading, a little faking
64. Respondents' perceived protection when using randomized response
65. Re‐interpreting the Marlowe‐Crowne Scale
66. Approval motivation
67. The validity of randomized responses for sensitive measurements
68. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias
69. Subject effects in laboratory research: an examination of subject roles, demand characteristics, and valid inference
70. Validity of welfare mother's interview response
71. Interviewer biasing effects: toward a reconciliation of findings
72. Objective self‐awareness
73. Interrelationships among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instructions
74. Interviewer role performance: a further note on bias in the information interview
75. Interviewer biasing effects: toward a reconciliation of findings
76. Methodological bias in public opinion surveys