Procedural fairness and self‐esteem

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 1993, Pages 313-325

  Koper, Gerda ^a   Van Knippenberg, Daan ^a   Bouhuijs, Francien ^a   Vermunt, Riel ^a   Wilke, Henk ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84985772765     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2420230307     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior
2. The moderator‐mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations
3. Self‐perception theory
4. The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage
5. Interactional justice communication criteria of fairness
6. Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts
7. Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments
8. Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity
9. Procedural justice: An interpretative analysis of personal systems
10. The distributive justice of organizational performance evaluations
11. Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations
12. Using diaries to promote procedural justice in performance appraisals
13. Fairness and participation in evaluation procedures: Effects on task attitudes and performance
14. Procedural goods in a democracy: How one is treated versus what one gets
15. Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments
16. Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest
17. Expectations, procedural justice, and alternative reactions to being deprived of a desired outcome
18. Equity/inequity, and self‐esteem: A reassessment
19. The role of perceived injustice in defendants' evaluations of their courtroom experience
20. Conditions leading to value‐expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models
21. What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures
22. The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group‐value model
23. The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders
24. Distributive and procedural aspects of satisfaction with citizen‐police encounters
25. The influence of perceived injustice on the endorsement of political leaders
26. Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control
27. The relation between procedural and distributive justice